UnixDevel Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 salut de ceva timp am inceput sa lucrez la un proiect personal idee este : db-ul acestui proiect este o combinatie intre mysql ( pentru anumite tabele ) si mongodb intrebare : credeti ca se merita sa mentin aceasta configuratie cu db-ul spart in 2 sau sa trec pe un singur db atentie vb de entries de peste 45 de milioane in principal se fac foarte multe citiri si foarte putine scrieri partea cu 45 de milioane de intrari este pe mongo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGSQ Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 De ce sa nu ai un singur DB dar cu mai multe slave-uri ? Gen PerconaDB impartit la 2-3 instante. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnixDevel Posted July 14, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 sincer sa fiu nu am folosit pana acum percona ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert1995 Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 (edited) Ce operatii faci pe alea 45M entries ? Recomand sa citesti asta : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9702643/mysql-vs-mongodb-1000-reads la primul comentariu Edited July 14, 2016 by Robert1995 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnixDevel Posted July 15, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 exact ce cautam merci Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
