Jump to content

Ecolor

Active Members
  • Posts

    114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Ecolor last won the day on May 8 2014

Ecolor had the most liked content!

About Ecolor

  • Birthday 11/16/1994

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Ecolor's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

36

Reputation

  1. Hi

    Would you be able to re-upload your very nice torrent that you posted in the link below

     

    If you are not able to re-upload the whole torrent, can you upload the following torrents from file A below?

     

    Acrobat 9 Pro: Creating Forms
    Acrobat 9 Pro: Creating Multimedia Projects
    Acrobat 9 Pro Essential Training
    Acrobat 9 Pro Getting Started
    Acrobat 9 Pro Tips and Tricks
    Acrobat X: Creating Forms
    Acrobat X Essential Training
    Acrobat X Tips and Tricks

     

    I hope to hear from you.

    Thank you.

     

    A

  2. a spus de mai multe ori ca are 300 de pagini.
  3. Hi Niklas, Patrick here from Google. I looked over your Github and LinkedIn profiles, and personal site (having found the panic_bcast project), and was keen to get in touch regarding a number of Engineering positions here at Google. Your Open Source contributions and projects, Systems/Networking experience and development background looked relevant to what some of the engineers here are doing, but I wanted to touch base with you first to understand a bit more about your work. If your schedule permits it, would you be open to a conversation next week? The positions I had wanted to share with you are part of a mission-critical team that combines software development, networking and systems engineering expertise to build and run large scale, massively distributed, fault-tolerant software systems and infrastructure. Thanks for your time and have a good weekend. Best regards, Patrick Replies with: Hi Patrick, Thank you for reaching out to me and complimenting me on the panic_bcast project, it is always flattering being recognized by entities greater than oneself. Before properly answering your question I would like to give you some background about myself and my relation to Google. As a kid growing up Google would always be the most interesting employee one working in the technical industry could possibly imagine. Google would flex very playfully in line with its “Don’t do evil” agenda. I grew up as a very ideologically and principle driven individual, but foremost I was curios by nature. As a kid interested in information security and computers in general I quickly began exploring code by breaking it and systems by breaking into them driven by the force that information wanted to be free. My father found out quickly and we had a long chat about life’s importance. He told me not to be wreckless because the future would consist of tyranny and powerless people. He told me that in the future the world’s power structures would depend much on what I would today categorize as cypherpunks and hackers. I feel that the future that my father explained to me as a kid is today’s present. Google says “Don’t do evil” on one hand, but on another hand Google also reads the contents of its users’ emails and tracks their behavior on the Internet – two things which I would characterise as directly evil. Google reads the emails that my mother is writing and tracking what my friends are buying. For advertisement purposes, Google says, and we only discovered the true consequences later when Edward Snowden blew the whistle. It turned out that Google had been helping American and European intelligence agencies illegally wiretap their own citizens. “We tried to fight back, we tried not to be evil!”, Google responds, but we never saw Google shut down its service in protest like Lavabit. We never saw Google fight back for the best of its users, which consists of a great majority of the world’s population. We saw Google justify its data inspection by saying that it was great for advertisement models. We learned that Google is in fact doing very evil things to the majority of the world’s population. We learned that Google tends to sport the two edged sword. We learned that Google’s “open source as much as possible” policy only applies as long as they don’t disrupt existing flows of cash. We witnessed Google sending cease and desist letters to the developers and maintainers of the popular Android CyanogenMod for violating some patents by modifying open source elements of an open source licensed project. We learned that Google’s friendliness is a marketing scheme. We learned that Google is not what we thought it would be, that it is not fighting for what’s best for humanity but for what’s best for its own dollar. I am different from Google in this sense. My principles are not compatible with those that Google is displaying and has displayed throughout history. Due to my principles I would much rather delete all data Google has collected about its users which consists of myself, my family, my friends, my co-workers and everybody that they know that connects to and uses popular services on the public Internet. I would not be able to sleep at night knowing that I worked for a company which was directly threatening and targeting the people that I love. I would never be able to develop the tyrannical tools required to keep the Google wheels spinning. I am on the opposite side of the spectra. The project which you acknowledged, panic_bcast, I wrote to make it harder for law enforcement officers to gather evidence on political activists through cold boot attacks. Other projects I am mainly involved in because I believe in a free unregulated stream of information on the public Internet. I am one of those lucky individuals who can afford to work only on projects which I choose, and I choose to only involve myself in projects that I believe contribute something positive to the planet’s population. Google is not very high on that list, therefor I must respectfully decline your job offer. “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail.” – Henry L. Stimson I wish you good luck on your quest to find the right candidate. Regards, Niklas
  4. Programul poate fi downloadat de pe SEO PowerSuite - The OFFICIAL FREE Version From Link-Assistant.Com Pentru a functiona totul bine trebuie sa facem pasii urmatori. 1) Intra in 'control panel' -> 'windows firewall' 2) Click 'advanced settings' in stanga 3) Click dreapta pe 'outbound rules', si dai 'new rule' 4) Bifeaza 'custom', si dai pe next. 5. On the program step, leave 'all programs' selected, click next. 6.La protocol and ports lasa totul asa si dai click next. 7. In scope dai pe 'these ip addresses' si apoi Add 8. Adauga adresa asta: '208.115.108.42', si click pe OK. 9. Da pe next si la urmatorul tabel dai click pe 'block the connection', apoi click next. 10. La urmatorul tabel lasi totul asa si dai next. 11. La nume trebuie sa pui 'gutasiflorinsalam' Acum deschide programul si foloseste licentele Licenses: link assistant aniket93 LA-98104557165202a5 rank tracker aniket93 RT-9864164364353745 website auditor aniket93 WA-98061647350641f2 seo spyglass aniket93 SSG-9870516003170138 buzz bundle aniket93 BZ-983474254311545e Cu placere
  5. A new Panda update has been rolled out by Google, and it’s important to everybody in SEO. So we’ve carried out an immediate analysis, and here are the results. An Important Note: In order to get this analysis to you as quickly as possible, the data we used was independent of the Searchmetrics Suite Research Area. However, it is included from the next rotational update in the Suite, and the data is viewable in the client project area as usual, depending upon your individual update cycles. Matt Cutts, Google’s Head of Webspam, announced the release of the Panda 4.0 update via his Twitter feed yesterday. Initially called “Farmer Update”, it was rolled out in the US in February 2011 and globally in August of the same year. The update aims to push pages with poor content and spam from the search results. This fourth generation of Panda started rolling out yesterday and Searchengineland.com are projecting that it will impact 7.5% of (english) search queries. Other languages may well be affected in differing proportions. As it revealed itself in the SERPs, we decided to take a look at it: Payday Loans 2.0 for “very spammy queries” At the same time as Panda 4.0, or even a little earlier (last weekend), “Payday – Loans 2.0? was rolled out. This update is more link-based and focuses on keywords with high search volumes and CPC in which the potential proportion of spam in the SERPs is likely to be very high. According to Matt Cutts, the proportion of affected searches in the United States was only about 0.3%, so let’s concentrate on Panda here. Panda 4.0 – A ‘Delicate’ Update After many smaller, almost monthly “refreshes”, the fourth Panda update seems to be a major one. However, according to the rumor mill, this update is more “soft and gentle” than previous ones, and will supposedly serve as a basis for future adjustments to the algorithm. However, as Matt Cutts announced at last year’s Pubcon in Las Vegas, Google’s future Panda is supposed to be “baked” into the algorithm, it’s surprising that this update comes as a new version when we were not expecting Google to roll it out with such a public announcement. Preliminary analysis – Foundation: SEO Visibility – delta value The following data is based on the organic SEO Visibility for each domain for all researched keywords, compared to our last data point. The actual traffic by each domain – for example brand and/or direct traffic etc. – can vary with values given here. Since there seems to be another reason for SEO Visibility loss of some domains, next to the Panda update (more on this below), and also some exceptions that I would not call Panda losers, I will call this a preliminary analysis. We will update this article as soon as we had a deeper look into the data, but I wanted to give you some insights right away. So lets start with a provisional lists – please interpret with caution: Google SERPs: Panda 4.0 Losers The lists are ordered by absolute loss / gain, which is shown in the respective column as rounded percentage. Basis of the analysis are domains that at least had a value of 10000 SEO Visibility before Panda 4.0 and that show now a change of at least +/-20 %. domain percent ask.com > – 50% ebay.com > – 33% biography.com > – 33% retailmenot.com > – 33% starpulse.com > – 50% history.com > – 33% isitdownrightnow.com > – 50% aceshowbiz.com > – 75% examiner.com > – 50% yellowpages.com > – 20% yourtango.com > – 75% dealcatcher.com > – 50% livescience.com > – 50% webopedia.com > – 50% xmarks.com > – 50% simplyrecipes.com > – 33% siteslike.com > – 50% digitaltrends.com > – 50% health.com > – 50% spoonful.com > – 75% songkick.com > – 75% realsimple.com > – 33% appbrain.com > – 33% thehollywoodgossip.com > – 50% dealspl.us > – 33% techtarget.com > – 33% gossipcop.com > – 50% rd.com > – 75% chow.com > – 33% doxo.com > – 50% heavy.com > – 50% csmonitor.com > – 33% toptenreviews.com > – 20% parenting.com > – 50% globalpost.com > – 75% espnfc.com > – 50% serviceguidance.com > – 50% mnn.com > – 75% mystore411.com > – 50% urlm.co > – 33% delish.com > – 50% healthcentral.com > – 33% whatscookingamerica.net > – 50% columbia.edu > – 20% songlyrics.com > – 20% internetslang.com > – 33% ibiblio.org > – 50% webutation.info > – 50% cheapflights.com > – 33% mybanktracker.com > – 50% Google SERPs: Panda 4.0 Winners domain percent glassdoor.com > 100% emedicinehealth.com > 500 % medterms.com > 500 % yourdictionary.com > 50% shopstyle.com > 250% zimbio.com > 500 % myrecipes.com > 250% couponcabin.com > 250% buzzfeed.com > 25% consumeraffairs.com > 100% wordpress.com > 20% thinkexist.com > 250% onhealth.com > 250% alternativeto.net > 100% whosdatedwho.com > 250% reverso.net > 50% wikimedia.org > 100% dogtime.com > 100% findthebest.com > 50% eatingwell.com > 100% quotegarden.com > 100% goodhousekeeping.com > 250% everydayhealth.com > 25% simplyhired.com > 100% momswhothink.com > 100% similarsites.com > 100% southernliving.com > 50% theknot.com > 25% allaboutvision.com > 100% openculture.com > 50% babyzone.com > 50% tasteofhome.com > 33% gotquestions.org > 100% movie4k.to > 50% wmagazine.com > 33% ycharts.com > 100% historyplace.com > 50% rcn.com > 100% salary.com > 50% skepdic.com > 100% mediawiki.org > 100% oodle.com > 100% abbreviations.com > 100% homes.com > 100% spokeo.com > 50% hlntv.com > 33% sparkpeople.com > 33% hayneedle.com > 50% emedtv.com > 100% Analysis: aggregators with little original content lose visibility As expected, the update mainly relates to the content area. In the loser list you will find a strong number of aggregators who mainly ranked with information from external sources – for example in the area of Coupons, News (here especially the celebrity/ gossip sector), Software – or of course price comparism websites. Also, some forums and weather portals are on the list. On the other hand, we also find some of the aggregators among the winners. Particularly strong are some price and product comparism sites, health pages and some local aggregators. The conclusion is therefore somehow unclear. It is possible that the Panda update is still not fully rolled out, so we will keep you updated. SERP in SERP losses Next to the mentioned aggregators, we found websites who lost at the directory level where they ranked with result pages. Presumably, this has not directly to do with the Panda update. We are currently working on a separate analysis. First conclusion : This panda did not only punish Some sites that should be potentially on the Panda loser list have actually shown a positive development. This could be the “learning from mistakes” (also from others), as some of these candidates have (now) written their own content. The losers on the other hand, tend to show syndicated content or even duplicate content. But this doesn’t mean that this is the end of the update. Google proofed in the past that they are able to perform improvements or rollbacks really fast. So we will see what will happen over the next weeks. By the way, the Payday-Loan losers can be identified pretty easy -> URL completely removed from the index (it’s more like a link -based loss) or not (rather Panda). As mentioned, the full dataset will be available in the Suite with the next update. In the project area of course is the data directly there for our customers, depending on the individual update cycle .
  6. Da, a cumparat like-uri, ads pe facebook si reclama pe alte pagini.
  7. @D3mEnT nu am intrebat pe cineva cum face bani adica sa ii zic 'ma spune-mi si mie cum sa fac 1000$ pe zi cu site-ul meu' am facut un topic pentru a arata ca sunt oameni care isi castiga existenta din asa ceva. Voi luati topicul in alt sens.
  8. Sunt sigur ca si aici sunt persoane care scot din internet sume pe care nu le poti castiga muncind in Romania. Daca are cineva chef si vrea sa posteze poate sa o faca in felul urmator 1) Din ce provin veniturile? a) Propriul site Alte site-uri. c) Lucrez pentru o firma online. d) Prestez servicii (nu si la domiciliu) c) Nu fac nici un ban. 2) Ai investit in IM? a) Da. Nu. 3) Ce venit ai pe luna? a) Intre 10 si 100$ Intre 100 si 400$ c) Intre 400 si 3000$ d) Milion + Milion fac mai multe milioane
  9. @NeK acum 2 ore am reinstalat windows-ul nu stiu daca mai merg dar o sa caut cateva si o sa le postez Ai urmat exemplul cu hosts?
  10. Articolul este foarte motivant, asa sa vada toti ca nu e greu.
  11. Eu acum ascult predica lui asta din discutii non it
  12. Tot am vazut pe forumuri din USA ca multi cauta programul YellaBot YellaBot Scraper - Scrape the Yellow Pages - USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Ireland, Indonesia, Germany, South Africa, Austria, New Zealand & France M-am uitat la niste videoclipuri despre program dar tot nu am ideie ce poti sa faci cu acele date. Edit: Am inteles acum care e rostul lui
  13. Download: Maxprog_Email_Verifier_and_Extractor -Extractor serial: ExT1-4377-4E44-3101-6653-28B7 -Verifier serial: VER1-733E-474F-7007-604B-33FD
  14. On: Omul vrea totul copy/paste Of: Sunt oameni care impartesc fluturase prin orase si castiga 400 lei pe luna.
×
×
  • Create New...