This site has been blocked by your ISP.

[iulik]

Quote

The FCC's Open Internet Rules (net neutrality rules) are extremely important to me. I urge you to protect them.

I don't want ISPs to have the power to block websites, slow them down, give some sites an advantage over others, or split the Internet into "fast lanes" for companies that pay and "slow lanes" for the rest.

Now is not the time to let giant ISPs censor what we see and do online.

Censorship by ISPs is a serious problem. Comcast has throttled Netflix, AT&T blocked FaceTime, Time Warner Cable throttled the popular game League of Legends, and Verizon admitted it will introduce fast lanes for sites that pay-and slow lanes for everyone else-if the FCC lifts the rules. This hurts consumers and businesses large and small.

Courts have made clear that if the FCC ends Title II classification, the FCC must let ISPs offer "fast lanes" to websites for a fee.

Chairman Pai has made clear that he intends to do exactly this.

But if some companies can pay our ISPs to have their content load faster, startups and small businesses that can't pay those fees won't be able to compete. You will kill the open marketplace that has enabled millions of small businesses and created the 5 most valuable companies in America-just to further enrich a few much less valuable cable giants famous for sky-high prices and abysmal customer service.

Internet providers will be able to impose a private tax on every sector of the American economy.

Moreover, under Chairman Pai's plan, ISPs will be able to make it more difficult to access political speech that they don't like. They'll be able to charge fees for website delivery that would make it harder for blogs, nonprofits, artists, and others who can't pay up to have their voices heard.

I'm sending this to the FCC's open proceeding, but I worry that Chairman Pai, a former Verizon lawyer, has made his plans and will ignore me and millions of other Americans.

So I'm also sending this to my members of Congress. Please publicly support the FCC's existing net neutrality rules based on Title II, and denounce Chairman Pai's plans. Do whatever you can to dissuade him.

Thank you!

 

[QuoVadis]

Si... ce sa le facem noi, sa-i luam de nevasta? Da-i in pula mea de muricani abjecti. ISPs de acolo oricum vand info clientilor pentru profit si 'nspemii de servicii secrete le urmaresc fiecare miscare, ca sanchi, teroristii.

 

#JewPower

[iulik]

20 minutes ago, QuoVadis said:

Si... ce sa le facem noi, sa-i luam de nevasta? Da-i in pula mea de muricani abjecti. ISPs de acolo oricum vand info clientilor pentru profit si 'nspemii de servicii secrete le urmaresc fiecare miscare, ca sanchi, teroristii.

 

#JewPower

 

Ma gandeam ca e un subiect interesant de discutie. Daca ei fac treaba asta e un bun exemplu pe viitor ca se poate si la noi asa ceva.

Edited July 12, 2017 by ManutaDeAur

[adicode]

O intrebare legata de subiect. Daca aia isi schimba dns-urile de la pc, isp-ul mai poate sa vada traficul lor, sa ii monitorizeze si restrictiile lor mai au vreo "putere" asupra lor?

[originalromanian]

On 12/07/2017 at 4:57 PM, adicode said:

O intrebare legata de subiect. Daca aia isi schimba dns-urile de la pc, isp-ul mai poate sa vada traficul lor, sa ii monitorizeze si restrictiile lor mai au vreo "putere" asupra lor?

Bineinteles.

 

DNS traduce o adresa din cuvinte in IP raspunzand cererilor hostului. Severul DNS nu face route intregului trafic ci doar instiinteaza ce adresa IPv4/6 ar trebui folosita de catre calculator. Odata ce adresa se stie, hostul isi trimite traficul catre default gateway care la randul lui trimite mai departe. Cererile DNS sunt in intregime clear text by default. In cei mai fundamentali termeni, providerul e prin definitie cel ce ii ofera (provides) access la internet retelei tale locale, lasand traficul sa treaca intre tine si internet, asadar tot traficul trece prin ei iar daca acesta nu e criptat atunci evident tot traficul este vizibil. Providerului poate cu foarte multa usurinta sa determine ca in loc sa-i intrebe pe ei ce adresa IP are google.com, calculatorul a intrebat altundeva si astfel sa determine ca hostul a incercat sa acceseze un anumit site datorita simplului fapt ca au existat cereri pentru traducere. Asta nu inseamna ca providerul poate determina ce activitate desfasoara hostul pe site dar nici ca nu poate.

 

Pentru anonimitate iti trebuie incriptie iar incriptia e o discutie total diferita. La baza, o buna majoritate a siteurilor in ziua da azi offera access https care ofera un anumit grad de anonimitate. Sunt multi mai multi factori totusi.