Nytro Posted January 9, 2021 Report Share Posted January 9, 2021 Why everyone should be using Signal instead of WhatsApp The Signal protocol underpins WhatsApp's encryption, but Facebook's ubiquitous messaging service doesn't hold a candle to Signal itself By K.G ORPHANIDES Thursday 16 April 2020 WIRED WhatsApp is the most popular communications app on the planet with over two billion users using it for messaging. Bought by Facebook in 2014, the service popularised the use of end-to-end encryption in day-to-day communications, introducing it as its default for messaging in 2016. To do so it cooperated with Moxy Marlinspike’s Open Whisper Systems to integrate the Signal encrypted messaging protocol. Microsoft and Google have also used the protocol, widely regarded as the gold standard in encrypted communications. Now Open Whisper Systems exists as Signal Messenger, LLC, and is part of the Signal Foundation. This rebranding has seen the foundation put more effort into its own app. The Signal Foundation's flagship Signal app provides fully-fledged and easy to use secure communications in its own right. It has direct and group messaging, as well as one-to-one audio and video chat, and there are very good reasons to opt for secure messaging's Cool Original flavour over WhatsApp. In February, the European Commission advised its staff to do exactly that. Here’s why you should use Signal for any conversation where privacy matters – even if that’s just giving your family the shared Disney+ password – and why your friends should, too. 1. Signal has more up-to-date security features New security features come to Signal first. For example, Signal has had disappearing messages – which are automatically deleted after a specified period of time – since 2016 but the feature is still being tested with small numbers of WhatsApp users. Other mainstream and beta Signal features that WhatsApp users don’t have include view-oncemedia messages, encrypted profiles, an incognito keyboard switch for Android to keep Gboard from sending your typing history back to Google, and backups that don’t default to unencrypted storage in Google Drive or Apple iCloud. Signal also has a slightly broader range of clients, with a dedicated client for Linux desktop users – likely to appeal to those in the security and data analysis fields, while WhatsApp directs them to its web app. 2. Signal is open source All of Signal’s source code is published for anyone to examine and use under a GPLv3 license for clients and an AGPLv3 license for the server. This means that you can see what’s going on inside it – or, more usefully, rely on the specialist expertise of people who review the code and know exactly what they’re looking for. 3. Signal has less potential for hidden vulnerabilities As a larger platform, WhatsApp is more inviting to malicious actors to start with, but the fact that its codebase is a proprietary closed box means that it may take longer for dangerous vulnerabilities to be detected. Any application can and eventually will suffer vulnerabilities – Signal has resolved a few of its own. But WhatsApp’s closed-source code (beyond its use of the open Signal protocol) means that there are a lot of potential targets that remain unknown until they’re exploited. A particularly worrying example was a vulnerability in WhatsApp’s VoIP stack, used by intelligence agencies to inject spyware in 2019. 4. You can run your own Signal server (but probably shouldn’t) Another advantage of open source software is that you can play with it, if you’re that way inclined. You probably won’t want or need a Signal server of your own for either personal or business reasons. It’s designed as a mass communications platform and isn’t really intended to scale down, it’s a pain to build and there are currently no containerised versions for easy deployment. But if you’re technically minded, you can learn a lot about how a system functions by building a test instance and poking it with a stick. It’s non-trivial, but community guides are available to help users get a Signal server up and running and some interesting forks exist, including a decentralised messaging system. 5. How much can you trust Facebook? Perhaps the most compelling reason to use Signal is Facebook's long-standing lack of respect for its users' privacy. Facebook has an appalling history when it comes to data collection and handling, from the Cambridge Analytica affair to its practice of sharing data about users with phone manufacturers. It’s already proved that it can’t be trusted with WhatsApp user data that should, under EU law, have remained private. In 2017, European regulators took action against Facebook for sharing the WhatsApp users’ phone numbers with its Facebook social network for advertising purposes. Firmly in breach of data protection regulations, it was an opt-out rather than opt-in system. Facebook had previously claimed such a mechanism would never be implemented. WhatsApp co-developer Brian Acton, who left Facebook in 2017 and went on to co-found the Signal Foundation with Marlinspike, has harshly criticised Facebook’s approach to privacy and revealed that Facebook coached him “to explain that it would be really difficult to merge or blend data between [WhatsApp and Facebook]” when giving information to EU regulators in 2014. Facebook’s desire to insert adverts and commercial messaging into WhatsApp and potentially compromise its security prompted Acton to leave Facebook early, sacrificing some $850 million in stock in the process. Acton’s fellow WhatsApp dev, Jan Koum, also walked out on Facebook following reported disputes with the company over its efforts to weaken encryption. Mark Zuckerberg has since publicly supported end-to-end encryption, saying it will also be added to its Messenger app. Facebook was until recently still vacillating over plans to introduce adverts to WhatsApp, with the latest reports indicating that the plan has finally been scrapped. Although it's not clear what will eventually happen to the service when Facebook merges WhatsApp with Instagram messaging and Messenger. Sursa: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/signal-vs-whatsapp 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nytro Posted January 9, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2021 Relevant 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoyois Posted January 9, 2021 Report Share Posted January 9, 2021 (edited) 3 hours ago, Nytro said: Relevant Sincer argumentele nu mi se par foarte solide. Da, WhatsApp e closed source, dar nu inseamna neaparat ca are spyware si logging pe absolut orice. Desigur ca privacy concern la cel mai inalt nivel face sens sa folosesti Signal, dar din paperul de la facebook iti dai seama ca incearca sa asigure o securitate cat mai mare pentru mesaje. Exista riscul ca pe viitor whatsapp sa fie mai putin secure dar pe moment nu cred ca existaa mari dovezi de nereguli. Cat despre "At no time does the whatsapp server have access to client's private keys" a fost scos presupun din cauza Business API. "The WhatsApp server has no access to the client’s private keys, though if a business user delegates operation of their Business API client to a vendor, that vendor will have access to their private keys - including if that vendor is Facebook." Stupid. Dar nu neaparat malicious. Edited January 9, 2021 by yoyois 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
