Lucas Posted June 14, 2007 Report Share Posted June 14, 2007 sal spunetim isi mie care procesor amd e cel mai bun pt jocurile care sint perfotmante acela athlon 64 x2 3800+ e bun ..vreau doar sugestia vostra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
novace Posted June 14, 2007 Report Share Posted June 14, 2007 amd x2 3800+ ii destul de puternic + poti sa il duci la 3 GHz overclocked fara probleme un amd x2 3800+ care normal lucreaza la 2 GHz e 270 lei iar un AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ care lucreaza la 3 GHz e 8 mil. Deci daca la amd x2 3800+ faci overclock il faci sa lucreze ca un procesor x2 de 6000+ care e de 3 ori mai scump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nos Posted June 14, 2007 Report Share Posted June 14, 2007 asa ceva am yo........ce a spous novace......se mijca fuge....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cein Posted June 14, 2007 Report Share Posted June 14, 2007 si eu am la fel Amd Athlon X2 3800+. Sunt foarte multumit de el si zic ca merita sa til achizitionezi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_net Posted June 14, 2007 Report Share Posted June 14, 2007 dipindi... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cein Posted June 14, 2007 Report Share Posted June 14, 2007 Da, normal ca depinde. Amd este mai pentru gaming si altele de genul acesta. INTEL sa zic ca e bun pentru buisness si restu.Aici tu hotarasti....De la mine ai un vot pentru AMD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrey90 Posted November 11, 2007 Report Share Posted November 11, 2007 am un Intel Core duo 3,6 si nu am gasit joc care sa imi faca probleme...pe detalii maxime (rezolutie 1600X1200) si in al 2lea rand Intel e mai scump dar mult mai fiabil..parerea mea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x.o Posted November 11, 2007 Report Share Posted November 11, 2007 am un Intel Core duo 3,6 si nu am gasit joc care sa imi faca probleme...pe detalii maxime (rezolutie 1600X1200) si in al 2lea rand Intel e mai scump dar mult mai fiabil..parerea meaaro baiatu` , treaba la jocuri sta in placa video si partial in rami ff putin in proc.Iar despre intel bleh .. diferenta de pret nejustificata !Big AMD Fan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wind_Storm Posted November 11, 2007 Report Share Posted November 11, 2007 +1 vot pt intel. am un p4 la 3.2 ghz si se misca bine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tupac_o Posted February 3, 2008 Report Share Posted February 3, 2008 fan intel e2180 si plus overclock la mai mult de 60%, 10x pentru fiabilitate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redblue86 Posted February 3, 2008 Report Share Posted February 3, 2008 depinde... noile procesoare intel pe 45nm sunt mai performante decat vechile procesoare pe 65nm .. gen e6600 e6700 e 6850 .. etc si sunt la un pret mult mai bun .. e 8400 gasesti la vreo 640ron ..iar e 8200 la vreo540 ron .. pe cand un e6850 il gasesti la 850 ron si e mai slab decat e8400(6mb cache) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mihaitza63 Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 inel a scos acum mai nou core 2 quad cu 4 nuclee... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redblue86 Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 eu m-am decis sa imi iau phenom 9500 .. in jocuri inca nu e foarte eficient pt ca jocurile nu sunt optimizate pt quad core...dar vor fi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ENCODED Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 AMD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-VIP-SoftKill Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 AMD :!: :!: ..pan la urma aici majoritatea voteaza cu ce detin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kenpachi Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 raport pret/calitate ... AMD Athlon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redblue86 Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 am vazut multe review-uri despre procesoarele phenom ,majoriatea nu erau in favoarea celor de la Amd.Ce e drept..spre deosebire de intel,nu se overclock-eaza la fel de bine. Am cumparat un phenom 9500 si pot sa spun ca nu regret, cat despre overclocking l-am dus la 2.8ghz (de la 2.2) cu racire stock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoyo2008 Posted February 25, 2008 Report Share Posted February 25, 2008 desi am intel e mai bun amd pt jocuri Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrei221 Posted March 6, 2008 Report Share Posted March 6, 2008 Desi am avut vreo ~ 3 ani AMD am trecut pe INTEL si nu regret deloc. Overclock mult! mai bun ... temperaturi bune cu, coolerul box.. ce sa zic..mergeti pe Intel! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelu Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Am avut Intel P4 3.2GHz, si de curand mi-am luat IntelCore2Duo 2x3Ghz. Foarte multumit de ambele procesoare, iti recomand Intel ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claudiu Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 momentan am un INTEL CORE 2 DUO E6850 3,0ghz x 2 vreo 4 mb cache cu toate ca ash fi vrut sa montez QX9650 3,0ghz x 4 vreo 12mb cache ..... cik e cel mai tare dar nu e compatibil cu toate jokurile din pacateoricum depinde pentru jokuri shi ce plaka video ai shi cat ram de obicei proc e ptr antialiasing x1 x2 x4 x8 x16 ---> x16 rulz , numa cu procesoare super tari mergeca plaka video fol 8800GT 512mb asus + 4 gb ram 800mhz kingston merg toate jokurile full option , shi crysis in special ..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyadron Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Chiar daca am AMD trebuie sa dau un vot pentru intel + ATI vga Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claudiu Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Chiar daca am AMD trebuie sa dau un vot pentru intel + ATI vgapai nu* merge bine AMD CU ATI , cas clase mai joase NVIDIA MERGE BINE CU INTEL SHI CREDEMA MERGE BINE HEHEHE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redblue86 Posted April 16, 2008 Report Share Posted April 16, 2008 momentan am un INTEL CORE 2 DUO E6850 3,0ghz x 2 vreo 4 mb cache cu toate ca ash fi vrut sa montez QX9650 3,0ghz x 4 vreo 12mb cache ..... cik e cel mai tare dar nu e compatibil cu toate jokurile din pacateoricum depinde pentru jokuri shi ce plaka video ai shi cat ram de obicei proc e ptr antialiasing x1 x2 x4 x8 x16 ---> x16 rulz , numa cu procesoare super tari mergeca plaka video fol 8800GT 512mb asus + 4 gb ram 800mhz kingston merg toate jokurile full option , shi crysis in special .....hai sa fim seriosi... chiar crezi ca pe QX9650 nu merg unele jocuri ? Si e sigur ca procu nu e pt antialiasing Eventual cresc performantele daca ai 2 placi in sli sau crossfire + un procesor bunicel.Oricum cu o singura placa video nu o sa joci crysis in veci cu x16.Offtopic : lauda de sine,nu miroase a bine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andreyz Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 ma eu am un AMD Athlon X2 Dual Core la 5400+ si pot sa zic k nu am avut niciodata probleme de knd am calcu..si am tinut si server del lineage pe el...AMD Rullzzz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...