martin08215

Eu n-am avut experiente prea bune cu D-Link, un DIR300 care mergea foarte prost, se bloca destul de des, si am scapat de el si un DIR615 pe care am pus DDWRT a mers ok vreo 8 luni pana a crapat de tot, mi-am luat banii inapoi pe el ca inca era in garantie, nu mai putea fi reparat si nici nu aveau sa imi dea altul in loc. Dintre cele doua si eu as merge pe Asus desi nu am avut dar stiu ca in general au un raport bun performanta/pret, si daca mai merge si openWRT/DDWRT/etc. pe el, e chiar super ok.

Da, de fapt e doctor-laptop.ro si sunt ok. Au si baterii originale, ceea ce pe mine ma interesat ca vroiam una mai mare, cu noua celule, si doar la ei am gasit, ca nici importatorii oficiali nu avea/aduceau.

La suma pe care esti disponibil sa o investesti mai bine iti iei un sistem audio HIFI direct sau pe componente si iti renovezi si camera in care il pui sa iti ingropi firele in perete. Oricum boxele au nevoie de curent separat daca semnalul audio se transmite fara fir, sunt cateva sisteme home theater, fara fir cu boxele alimentate separat, deci de fire nu scapi, poate cu acumulatori ca am vazur destule boxe fara fir, pe Bluetooth. Dar nici asa nu e comod, sa stai sa incarci acumulatori sau sa schimbi bateri, ca oricum un sitem puternic consuma. Uitate pe forumurile de specialitate, am vazut o discutie pe tema asta mai demult chiar pe un forum romanesc.

Transformatorul boxelor suporta 110-220 V sau 110-120 V? Daca suporta 110-220 V poti inlocui doar cablul cu stecher ptr RO, dar sa fii sigur ca suporta, eventual sa te uiti daca are vreun switch de la 110 la 220V ca la unele surse de PC.

Android security mystery – ‘fake’ cellphone towers found in U.S. [There have been many comments to this story from people who are assuming that these 'towers' are physical installations. There's no reason to assume this is the case: it's far likelier that they are mobile installations of the kind used not only by law enforcement and government agencies, but also by scammers and other criminals. (David Harley)] Seventeen mysterious cellphone towers have been found in America which look like ordinary towers, and can only be identified by a heavily customized handset built for Android security – but have a much more malicious purpose, according to Popular Science. The fake ‘towers’ – computers which wirelessly attack cellphones via the “baseband” chips built to allow them to communicate with their networks, can eavesdrop and even install spyware, ESD claims. They are a known technology - but the surprise is that they are in active use. The towers were found by users of the CryptoPhone 500, one of several ultra-secure handsets that have come to market in the last couple of years, after an executive noticed his handset was “leaking” data regularly. Its American manufacturer boasts that the handset has a “hardened” version of Android which removes 468 vulnerabilities from the OS. Android Security: Towers throughout the US Despite its secure OS, Les Goldsmith of the handset’s US manufacturer ESD found that his personal Android security handset’s firewall showed signs of attack “80 to 90” times per hour. The leaks were traced to the mysterious towers. Despite having some of the functions of normal cellphone towers, Goldsmith says their function is rather different. He describes them as “interceptors” and says that various models can eavesdrop and even push spyware to devices. Normal cellphones cannot detect them – only specialized hardware such as ESD’s Android security handsets. Who created the towers and maintains them is unknown, Goldsmith says. Origin of towers ‘unknown’ “Interceptor use in the U.S. is much higher than people had anticipated,” Goldsmith says. “One of our customers took a road trip from Florida to North Carolina and he found eight different interceptors on that trip. We even found one at South Point Casino in Las Vegas.” [Editor's note: Goldsmith has asked us to stress that the tower was actually in the vicinity of the casino, not within the casino itself.] Their existence can only be seen on specialized devices, such as the custom Android security OS used by Cryptophone, which includes various security features – including “baseband attack detection.” The handset, based on a Samsung Galaxy SIII, is described as offering, a “Hardened Android operating system” offering extra security. “Baseband firewall protects against over-the-air attacks with constant monitoring of baseband processor activity, baseband attack detection, and automated initiation of countermeasures”, claims the site. “What we find suspicious is that a lot of these interceptors are right on top of U.S. military bases.” says Goldsmith. “Whose interceptor is it? Who are they, that’s listening to calls around military bases? The point is: we don’t really know whose they are.” Baseband attacks are considered extremely difficult – the details of the chips are closely guarded. “Interceptors” are costly devices – and hacking baseband chips is thought to be technically advanced beyond the reach of “ordinary” hackers, ESD says. The devices vary in form, and are sold to government agencies and others, but are computers with specialized software designed to defeat the encryption of cellphone networks. The towers target the “Baseband” operating system of cellphones – a secondary OS which sits “between” iOS or Android, for instance, and the cellular network. Goldsmith says that the devices cost “less than $100,000” and does not mention what level or type of device his team has detected. Most are still out of reach of average hackers, although freely advertised. One model is the VME Dominator, which is described as, “a real time GSM A5.1 cell phone interceptor. It cannot be detected. It allows interception of voice and text. It also allows voice manipulation, up or down channel blocking, text intercept and modification, calling & sending text on behalf of the user, and directional finding of a user during random monitoring of calls.” What has come as a surprise is how many “interceptors” are in active use in the U.S., and that their purpose remains mysterious. Author Rob Waugh, We Live Security Sursa Android security mystery - 'fake’ cellphone towers found in U.S.

Din cate stiu media box-ul/decodorul e in pereche cu smart cardul (paired) adica nu functioneaza unul fara altul chiar si in reteaua aceluiasi furnizor de servicii, probabil poate fi ocolita intr-un fel protectia dar nu m-a interesat, si daca smart cardul nu e autentificat in retea sau media box-ul nu e paired, nu pot functiona.Aceeasi chestie e si incazul modulelor CAM CI

O alta chestie poate chiar mai dubioasa, proiectul ptr Legea securitatii cibernetice a Romaniei

Am folosit in trecut GetDataBack for NTFS/FAT etc.ca sa recuperez datele cu tot cu structura de directoare. Ai putea sa il incerci. Sa inteleg ca cu TestDisk PhotoRec nu merge, FAT sau MFT fix ai incercat ?

Incerci cumva din Torbrowser ? Am mai vazut asa ceva la el, solutia a fost schimbarea exit-nod-ului cu unul cara sa convina la yahoo, nu mi s-a parut o explicatie prea logica dar a mers.

Daca tot nu merge bine, macar se pot lua banii inapoi ?

Vodafone la calitate in general, la internet Orange pentru mine e dezamagitor. Am testat si Digi pe internet si chiar mi s-a parut peste Vodafone si Orange, dar probabil erau mai putini utilizatori pe celulele respective, oricum au o cota mica de piata si probabil reteaua mai putin incarcata.

pyOBD ca si soft pare o optiune de luat in seama, chiar nu auzisem si cred ca o sa o incerc si eu. Ma axasem pe variante profesionale, bine nu originale, dar sa suporte softul respectiv, pentru o diagnoza auto de amator, care sa stie ce e cu masina lui cat de cat inainte sa ajunga in service sau preventiv e ok un soft si o interfata low cost.

Eu am folosit VCDS de la Ross-Tech, nu originala, chinezarie dar isi facea treaba, ptr ce vrei tu si chiar mai mult, e ptr masinile din grupul VAG (Volskwagen, Audi, Seat, Skoda) si legate de el, gen Maybach, Porsche. Cel mai ok cred ca e sa cauti ceva dedicat ptr masina ta (iti recunoaste mai bine codurile) si poti folosi o masina virtuala, e chiar mai ok asa, clonele se mai ard cand isi fac update de pe site-ul oficial. Am folosit si Torque pt Android ca si scorpio2k2, dar nu am fost prea incantat, mergea, dar nu vedeam prea multe, probabil depinde si de masina.

https

Sa ne faci si noua un review pe forum poate ma convingi. Ai comandat cumva si cu rucsac/baterie ?