aelius

Probabil ca folosesti un cablu "ecranat" de proasta calitate (cablul care iti vine in receiver sau cel AV). Trece cumva vreunul pe langa priza ?

- root nu reprezinta un server - root nu reprezinta o distributie de linux "Trebuia sa intrebi: Am un server cu Linux, RedHat/Debian/Fedora/Ubuntu si doresc sa instalez perl. Ma puteti ajuta ?" - Daca vreti ajutor, evitati cuvintele astea "root, roata, scanu" si pana mea. Pa. Ban permanent.

ar trebui sa iei ban. next time, cand deschizi topicuri de genul, chiar e al tau

maxmind nu face update-uri cum trebuie. am o subnet si desi e alocat in UK, el arata ca e in romania (toate datele la whois arata de UK) Mai sunt si la RDS adrese ip cu 5.x (le vede de Olanda) Poate sa faci un tool sa se bazeze pe mai multe raspunsuri: maxmind, whois (ripe) + mtr/traceroute output (sa vezi nodurile prin care trece)

Butonul ... deasta e pus acolo, sa fie si putin fun Nu e chestie de raspuns la intrebari. Acolo sa fie doar pentru discutii tehnice, sa nu ne mai invadeze toti cu discutii despre muieri, iarba, Ousti, si altele

Sunteti de acord sa facem doua canale acolo ?. Adica sa fie cel default RST, cum este acum, si inca unul, TECH, pe care o sa fie numai discutii tehnice, sa nu mai vedem balarii acolo. Mai intra cate un om ce cere un mic ajutor si scriem de pomana ce si cum sa configureze, ca suntem spamati de alte texte. Este util si pentru discutii strict tehnice. // edit: Selectati POLL Nota: Multumim lui silvian0 pentru idee.

Study Shows Cost Of Data Center Outage at $7,900 Per Minute While never seen or talked about by most employees in a typical enterprise, data centers play a critical role in keeping operations moving and transactions processing, so it’s no surprise that any data center outage can be severely costly. As organizations continue to increasingly rely on technology and applications hosted in a data center, the cost of an outage has increased significantly, according to the results of a recent study. According to the 2013 Cost of Data Center Outages study, a Ponemon Institute study sponsored by Emerson Network Power, the cost of an unplanned data center outage is approximately $7,900 per minute, an increase of 41 percent from $5,600 in 2010. The 2013 report analyzed outage costs at 67 data centers within the last year across varying industry segments with a minimum size of 2,500 square feet. “Given the fact that today’s data centers support more critical, interdependent devices and IT systems than ever before, most would expect a rise in the cost of an unplanned data center outage compared to 2010. However, the 41 percent increase was higher than expected,” said Larry Ponemon, Ph.D., chairman and founder, the Ponemon Institute. “This increase in cost underscores the importance for organizations to make it a priority to minimize the risk of downtime that can potentially cost thousands of dollars per minute.” In September, Emerson Network Power released the first part of this study, which surveyed more than 450 U.S.-based data center professionals and focused on the root causes and frequency of data center downtime. Eighty-three percent of respondents said they knew the root cause of the unplanned outage. Thirty-four percent of respondents cited cyber attacks as the root cause of a data center outage, a 15 percent increase since 2010. Other frequently cited root causes of outages include: • UPS battery failure (55 percent) • Accidental EPO/human error (48 percent) • UPS capacity exceeded (46 percent). • Weather-related outage (30 percent) Highlights of the 2013 Costs of Data Center Outages report include: • Average cost of data center downtime across industries was approximately $7,900 per minute. (A 41 percent increase from the $5,600 in 2010.) • The average reported incident length was 86 minutes, resulting in average cost per incident of approximately $690,200. (In 2010 it was 97 minutes at approximately $505,500.) • For a total data center outage, which had an average recovery time of 119 minutes, average costs were approximately $901,500. (In 2010, it was 134 minutes at about $680,700.) • For a partial data center outage, which averaged 56 minutes in length, average costs were approximately $350,400. (In 2010, it was 59 minutes at approximately $258,000.) “Those organizations with revenue models that depend on the data center’s ability to deliver IT and networking services to customers – such as telecommunications service providers and e-commerce companies – and those that deal with a large amount of secure data – such as defense contractors and financial institutions – continue to incur the most significant costs associated with downtime; with the highest cost of a single event more than $1.7 million,” the report said. “As data centers continue to evolve to support businesses and organizations that are becoming more social, mobile and cloud-based, there is an increasing need for a growing number of companies and organizations to make it a priority to minimize the risk of downtime and commit the necessary investment in infrastructure technology and resources,” said Peter Panfil, vice president, global power, Emerson Network Power. Source: Cyber Attacks Are The Root Cause in 30 Percent of Data Center Outages: Study | SecurityWeek.Com

Pai da-le ma peste nas. Unde cacat vad ei carduri aici ? Futu-le sfintenia sufletelor de labagii notorii care vorbesc prostii.

Activitatea ta pe RST se termina la prezentare. Ban permanent. Thread closed.

doar dedicate - dar am vazut ca te ocupi cu scanul si nu prezinti incredere // edit: Asta ?

Cum s-ar spune, 'bashed'! (23:06:03) Oust: -bash: cd: /dev/sda4/: Not a directory (23:06:10) Oust: Plm, nu pot sa intr-un sda4. (23:06:11) Oust: E criptat.

post hunter, ban 24 de ore -> http://photobase.ro/di-78X1.png Va multumim pentru audienta.

Cumparati fratilor daca vreti. E 3 euro, ce rahat mai cautati seriale si nenorociri. E mai putin decat un pachet de tigari.

Baaaa, terminatilor, daca tot nu sunteti in stare sa va faceti un scanner bun, de ce saracia va apucati de rahaturi. Folositi toti synscan facut de Baganontu (DrBios) acum 14 ani in urma. L-au luat toti labagii gata facut si au pus un bash preacurvit international pe langa el cu "Powered by }{ Gica Hackeru, ilustrul geniu al lumii contemporane }{ cu pupici si floricele la nickname" sa vada lumea ca sunt ei priceputi. Mai stricati si cutiile oamenilor de pomana cu mizeriile astea. Ce sfantul excremente faceti cu ele ? Va faceti boti/emech/psybnc-uri pentru nemurirea sufletului ? Threadul asta aici nu e deschis de pomana. Si nu mai dezgropati threadurile astea adormite de mai bine de un an. Thread closed, da-l in sfantul si minunatul corahoz.

E URI prea lung, mai taie din el N-are rost sa dau pm.

Nu imi plac distributiile ce folosesc pachete/manager rpm. //offtopic shaggi, ce crocobaur zici acolo frate ? Doamne, cum suna, CrunchBang. De ce as utiliza o distributie bazata pe o alta distributie care la randul ei este debian based ? )

Asta denota ca statul comite orice ilegalitate pentru interesele sale. Practic accesezi example dot com pe https, certificatul este valid, domeniul example este cunoscut si te autentifici. Nu ai de unde stii ca o organizatie de stat redirecteaza traficul printr-un server local si mapeaza pe domeniu un alt certificat ssl pentru interceptarea de date. (sau ma rog, un certificat intermediar intre cel ce se afla in radacina browserelor si cel al domeniului)

Salutari, Au mai fost discutii de genul (chiar foarte multe) si nu s-a concretizat nimic pentru ca s-a cazut de comun acord ca sunt idei proaste. Aici nu sunt numai Romani iar comunitatea este deschisa pentru oricine este interesat si nu calca pe bec intr-un fel sau altul. Testele de genul ar descuraja inregistrarea in mod sigur. Da, am face o selectie probabil, dar nu cred ca e cazul sa ajungem la captcha de genul de mai jos pentru inregistrare. Cred ca e simplu, in orice moment este cel putin un moderator sau un admin online iar retarzii o sa isi ia ban in maxim un minut daca posteaza ceva aiurea.

“ar fi” sau “ar fii”? | diacritica Si nu va mai intindeti la offtopic ca va luati ban pe coaja. @euintreb: Vorbeste frumos, las-o pe ma-sa in pace

Se supara cineva daca inchid threadul asta? E o discutie interminabila, fara sens. Completati de pomana petitii online si discutati la fel. Si nu mai credeti tot ce se scrie in presa. Sunt doar ziaristi halitori de rahat si sunt in stare sa faca orice pentru audienta.

Vad ca ai "11 point(s) total" - Nu stiu dupa ce criterii vBulletin calculeaza reputatia. Pare in regula, nu este vorba de un abuz. In cel mai rau caz, de o eroare (insa nu este cazul). Eu am 262 puncte si imi afisaza rep power 10. Serios, chiar nu sta nimeni sa "manareasca" rep power-ul userilor.

In yet another washup from the Snowden revelations, the developers of FreeBSD have decided to take several steps backwards in their crypto work, to stop using hardware random number generators (RNGs). The two hardware RNGs singled out by the FreeBSD developers in this post are Intel's RDRAND (in Ivy Bridge processors), and VIA's Padlock. The decision was made at the FreeBSD Developer Summit, held in Malta in September, but the decision to pull the hardware RNGs didn't attract any attention at the time. “For [FreeBSD] 10, we are going to backtrack and remove RDRAND and Padlock backends and feed them into Yarrow instead of delivering their output directly to /dev/random. It will still be possible to access hardware random number generators, that is, RDRAND, Padlock etc., directly by inline assembly or by using OpenSSL from userland, if required, but we cannot trust them any more”, the post states. One solution on offer from Polish developer Pawel Jakub Dawidek, the post states, is to use the time it takes to attach devices at boot time, and feed these numbers into /dev/random: “it turns out that one can get about 4 good bits of entropy from each device”. Among the many things Edward Snowden's documents have suggested is that the NIST's crypto standardisation efforts were nobbled by the NSA. This confirmed long-standing knowledge that the Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generator is weak, leading to RSA abandoning it in September. Not everybody believes that RDRAND falls into the same category. Linus Torvalds, for example, dismissed concerns about the instruction, telling the author of an online petition to yank the command from Linux “we actually know what we're doing. You don't”. In that debate, Torvalds pointed out that RDRAND isn't the only source of entropy for values streamed into /dev/random in a Linux implementation. Source: FreeBSD abandoning hardware randomness • The Register Personal note: You can use EGD instead of standard '/dev/random'. Also, you can use it for apache (httpd) in https configurations.

The latest release of the Firefox web browser, version 26, now blocks Java software on all websites by default unless the user specifically authorizes the Java plugin to run. The change has been a long time coming. The Mozilla Foundation had originally planned to make click-to-run the default for all versions of the Java plugin beginning with Firefox 24, but decided to delay the change after dismayed users raised a stink. Beginning with the version of Firefox that shipped on Tuesday, whenever the browser encounters a Java applet or a Java Web Start launcher, it first displays a dialog box asking for authorization before allowing the plugin to launch. Users can also opt to click "Allow and Remember," which adds the current webpage to an internal whitelist so that Java code on it will run automatically in the future, without further human intervention. Mozilla's move comes after a series of exploits made the Java plugin one of the most popular vectors for web-based malware attacks over the past few years. So many zero-day exploits targeting the plugin have been discovered, in fact, that the Firefox devs have opted to give all versions of Java the cold shoulder, including the most recent one. Generally speaking, Mozilla plans to activate click-to-run for all plugins by default, although the Adobe Flash Player plugin has been given a pass so far, owing to the prevalence of Flash content on the web. In addition to the change to the default Java plugin behavior, Firefox 26 includes a number of security patches, bug fixes, and minor new features. The official release notes are available here and a full list of changes in the release can be found here. As usual, current Firefox installations can be upgraded to version 26 using the internal update mechanism, and installers for the latest release are available from the Firefox homepage. Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/12/10/firefox_26_blocks_java/

Se refera la faptul ca utilizatorul ce a deschis threadul (adica tu) nu este de incredere iar aplicatia postata este un stealer. Tie nu iti pare ilogic sa ai username clitoris pe un forum IT ?

Am remarcat ca in ultima vreme am fost invadati de tot felul de indivizi, marea majoritate venind de pe irc (dupa vocabular). Ar fi de preferat ca cei care intra aici si doresc sa vanda ceva pe RST Market, sa aduca si un beneficiu acestei comunitati: un tutorial, o stire de securitate, un mic ajutor celorlalti utilizatori. Serios, aici nu e mercador. De asemenea, cand doresc sa vanda servere, sa spuna ce anume vand mai exact: server linux, distributie, model cpu, memorie. S-a umplut forumul de "vand root uid0 eth0". Ce saracia e asta fratilor? Eu o vad ca pe o bataie de joc si o sa incep sa dau warn-uri unde vad asa ceva. Invatati ce inseamna termenii pe care-i folositi! - root: Nu, nu este un server de scan. Este un utilizator cu drepturi depline intr-un sistem *nix - eth0: Reprezinta primul device de retea intr-un sistem linux. Va incomodeaza daca se numeste rl0, fxp0, em0, bge0? - uid0: Pai daca ati spus ca vindeti ROOT, poate el avea alt USER ID decat 0 ? E ca si cum ati spune ca vindeti masina cu volan si claxon.