Nytro

Nop, e doar vorba de bani, daca nu ar da salarii de 5000 RON ar avea si ei oameni buni. Utilizatorii sunt serviciul. Banii nu se fac doar vanzand direct catre consumatori (e.g. iti cumperi o masina). Utilizatorii sunt cei care aduc banii, cum e Facebook sau Instagram, dau click pe reclame. Google Maps si celelalte servicii Google aduc multi bani indirect, strangand informatii despre utilizatori astfel incat la ei sa ajunga cele mai relevante reclame. Dap, cei care vor sa faca bani vanzand mizerii catre oamenii simpli. Produse idioate, nenatatoase sau mai stiu eu ce. Asa functioneaza economia. E doar un exemplu, dar uite ceva concret, cu acel United Healthcare - big pharma american. Banii se duc "unde trebuie", la actionari si la cine trebuie sa scoata sute de milioane din profiturile facute de corporatii. Dar asta nu are legatura cu serviciile. Da, dar am plecat de la servicii secrete si am ajuns la altele. Inteleg ca esti de acord cu mine ca nu e vorba doar despre servicii secrete, ca ele controleaza tot sau mai stiu eu ce teorii conform carora pamantul era plat iar ei l-au rotunjit. Daca mergi pe ideea asta, mai schimba de pe Realitatea Plus televizorul. Teoria ta duce catre rusi. Ce sa inteleg din asta? Ca ei sunt cei de treaba? PS: Imi plac discutiile de genul acesta dar ne-am deplasat putin de la scopul topicului.

Parca ti-a disparut toata paranoia Cei care fac treburile "murdare" sunt acolo nu? Nu cred ca NSA are un echivalent la noi. Chiar citeam zilele astea o carte de crypto (Understanding Cryptography) in care erau mentionate cateva lucruri interesante, precum faptul ca DES e safe impotriva differential analysis care a fost descoperit public prin anii 90, in timp ce algoritmul e cu 20 de ani mai vechi. Si mai erau cateva astfel de mentiuni. Nu era specificat cine le descoperise initial, dar erau mentionate lucruri gen NSA sau GCHQ. Si astea sunt informatii publice. Daca tu crezi ca aceia sunt angajatii NSA sau ca sunt toti, ma dezamagesti, dupa discutiile de mai sus. Edit: Ca tot vorbeam la inceput despre hackeri, aici e hacking adevarat conform standardelor mele: https://media.ccc.de/v/38c3-blinkencity-radio-controlling-street-lamps-and-power-plants

A significant portion of Europe's renewable energy production can be remotely controlled via longwave radio. While this system is intended to stabilize the grid, it can potentially also be abused to destabilize it by remotely toggling energy loads and power plants. In this talk, we will dive into radio ripple control technology, analyze the protocols in use, and discuss whether its weaknesses could potentially be leveraged to cause a blackout, or – more positively – to create a city-wide Blinkenlights-inspired art installation. With three broadcasting towers and over 1.3 million receivers, the radio ripple control system by *EFR (Europäische Funk-Rundsteuerung) GmbH* is responsible for controlling various types of loads (street lamps, heating systems, wall boxes, …) as well as multiple gigawatts of renewable power generation (solar, wind, biogas, …) in Germany, Austria, Czechia, Hungary and Slovakia. The used radio protocols Versacom and Semagyr, which carry time and control signals, are partially proprietary but completely unencrypted and unauthenticated, leaving the door open for abuse. This talk will cover: - An introduction to radio ripple control - Detailed analysis of transmitted radio messages, protocols, addressing schemes, and their inherent weaknesses - Hardware hacking and reversing - Implementation of sending devices and attack PoCs - (Live) demonstrations of attacks - Evaluation of the abuse potential - The way forward Licensed to the public under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 URL: https://media.ccc.de/v/38c3-blinkencity-radio-controlling-street-lamps-and-power-plants

Ai cateva exemple? De persoane publice care ar lucra la NSA sau similare? Poate face asta daca are ceva de castigat. La companii precum Google sau Apple are sens, dar la altele mai mici, nu prea. Ce se intampla pe device-uri poate analiza oricine. Se poate afla, dureaza procesul de reverse engineering pentru aplicatii dar nu e deloc imposibil. Exista oricum alternative sau se pot crea oricand alte aplicatii. Oricum, nici corporatiile astea nu se arunca cu capul inainte deoarece daca sunt prinse, ceea ce se poate cum ziceam prin reverse engineering, e foarte nasol: pierd multi utilizatori, scade stockul si smecherii (aia cu adevarat smecheri, actionari cu mult stock) pierd multi bani.

Eu cred ca cei care lucreaza pentru NSA nu sunt persoane publice. Nu apar pe Twitter, pe la conferinte si prin alte locuri. Majoritatea lucreaza pe bani frumosi pentru multinationale / corporatii. Unele companii investesc in persoane a caror munca de zi cu zi nu e sa faca pentest, ci sa faca research, sa descopere lucruri noi. Cel mai cunoscut exemplu e Google Project Zero, dar multe companii au astfel de oameni. Ceea ce e ideal, omul se dezvolta, compania e ajutata. Mai greu de argumentat cu managementul despre ROI (Return of Investment). Acum, fiecare intelege ce vrea prin hacker. Eu am o parere, ca sunt cei care fac research, descopera si publica lucruri interesante, tu poate esti de parere ca singurul lucru care conteaza sunt banii. Poate e cate putin din fiecare.

Recent: PS: Tipa e smechera. E top.

Prima regula care nu se aplica doar in security, ci si in multe alte lucruri, inclusiv fotbal sau mai stiu eu ce e urmatorul: sa iti placa ceea ce faci. Daca o faci pentru bani, slabe sanse sa ai succes. Daca iti place o sa pui si osul la treaba care e urmatorul pas. Sa inveti. Mai intai cate putin din fiecare, apoi extinzi ceea ce stii in functie de necesitati.

Banii se fac muncind, legal. Sau inseland, furand sau efectuand alte activitati - ilegal. Grupurile la care te referi probabil sunt niste mizerii piramidale din care nu o sa faci bani, o sa pierzi inutil mult timp.

O sa ma uit pe 8 ian cand ma intorc la treaba.

How I Also Hacked my Car 2024-01-30T22:14:07+00:00 • goncalomb • hacking,car,dacia,rpi This blog post is kind of inspired by another that I saw on HN some time ago, "How I Hacked my Car". After praising the infotainment system of the car, a Hyundai IONIQ, the author ends up hacking it and running custom software on the head unit. Well, my much cheaper 2023 Dacia Sandero also has a decent infotainment system with navigation and wireless Android Auto. Even before I got the car, I searched around to see if the system was hackable. I was not surprised to find that a simple USB drive with an autorun.sh script gets run as root. A classic. Various forums around the web use this method to change skins and side-load navigation maps. I was not interested in that, my goal was also to run some custom software. Well, there is more to the story, otherwise, I would just that autorun.sh "feature". The Infotainment System The system is a MediaNav Evolution from Renault (which Dacia is a subsidiary of), built by LG (FCC ID: BEJLAN5900WR). It's a Linux box. Over the years there have been various iterations of this system, the older devices used WinCE. The navigation part of the software is by a company called NNG (iGO?). Apparently, they provide navigation software for many other devices. MediaNav Evolution (unofficially called MediaNav 4) The autorun.sh Just by looking around on various forums, I knew of 3 special files that when placed on a USB drive would trigger some debug functions: autorun_bavn/autorun.sh: a script that gets run as root logfiles_bavn: a directory that gathers various system logs and files usb_logging: a directory where the system continually dumps dlt files (proprietary log system) One good thing about the log files is that they contain the Wi-Fi password for the AP. This password can be reset on the UI, but it's never visible. Knowing the password allows other devices to connect to it (e.g. PC). When using wireless Android Auto it connects automatically, I think it bootstraps using Bluetooth. I was most interested in the autorun.sh... But it was not working, I couldn't get the script to run. The Firmware At this point, I decided to start inspecting the firmware to see what was wrong, and if there was another way in. My device came with version 6.0.9.9. I wanted a recent update file, but the official website doesn't provide a direct download. It requires installing a desktop application, "Toolbox", which I ended up doing. The application can be used to buy map updates or download firmware/OS updates for free. The procedure starts with collecting some information about the system/car to a USB drive. After connecting it to a PC, the "Toolbox" software detects a new update and puts the new update file on the drive. I didn't update it, I just wanted the file, it was version 6.0.10.2: >: file upgrade.lgu upgrade.lgu: POSIX tar archive (GNU) I also had an older update file, version 6.0.9.7, that I found in some random forum. Sometimes even grep can be a great analysis tool. Just by running grep -RF autorun.sh on the contents of both the new and old firmware, I could see that the new one had no matches. Time to load Ghidra and see what's going on... Version 6.0.9.7 has the autorun.sh feature, but it is not present on version 6.0.10.2 Comparing the 2 files it was evident that they had removed the autorun.sh backdoor. Even though I didn't have the specific firmware for my installed version (6.0.9.9), it was clear that mine didn't have it and that's why I could never get it to work. This miscmanager file is also responsible for the other USB debug features, these are all still there. The core OS appears to be from GENIVI/COVESA (GitHub: GENIVI/COVESA). I'm not familiar with these systems at all. They have a fair bit of open-source stuff that will probably explore in the future. I decompiled other binaries to try to look for some other interesting stuff. Found a lot of D-Bus stuff, that will be useful for getting vehicle information when I can run my own software. But my goal was to get root access first. One way would be to craft a new update file with a backdoor, which would require reverse engineering the whole upgrade procedure, and as expected the update files do have some signature hashes that presumably need to match. Getting root access directly would be the preferred way. The Android Update App Something I noticed on the official website was that they were promoting a new way to update the maps, using an Android phone app. Could this be my way in? The description on Google Play promises to "Eliminate the Sneaker Network", an expression that I had never heard, in reference to not requiring a USB drive. Of course I didn't install it, there is no point in that. I just searched the id com.nng.pbmu.dacia on Google to find one of the many sites that offer the .apk file for download. I'm not an Android developer, I just know that deep inside there is some bytecode that traces its root back to Java, and I know Java. I don't care about Dalvik, ART, Zygote, or whatever. Just give me those Java classes. Over the years I've decompiled a few Android apps, my preferred way is just to unpack the .apk as a .zip (that's all it is), get the .dex bytecode files, run them through dex2jar to get some .jar files and open them with good old JD-GUI. Recently I've discovered jadx which provides a better experience for decompiling apps. To my surprise the app was quite complex, it appears to include some sort of native bindings, and most of the functionality is implemented in some kind of proprietary .xs scripts (similar to JavaScript). These are found on the app's resources. Android APIs are exported as modules to be used in the .xs scripts Several native libraries and .xs scripts It appears that the liblib_nng_sdk.so library is responsible for running these scripts, but I didn't explore it further. My goal was just to focus on what kind of protocol was used to update the maps on the device. And I found it in the file nftp.xs. NFTP!? Is it standard FTP? No, it's not standard FTP or any other known protocol that I could find. It's a new binary protocol for transferring files, implemented on these .xs scripts. The app then uses Android Open Accessory (AOA) as the transport layer for the protocol. AOA was totally new to me, but after some reading, it was clear that it is just a way of establishing a standard for an accessory to talk USB with an Android device. The names are confusing, the "accessory" is actually the USB host (in this case, the head unit) and the Android device is the USB peripheral. The Other Side The new update file that I had was version 6.0.10.2, which, according to the website, was the version required for the new update app to work. That naturally means that there is some specific service/code on that file to handle the update on the head unit side. After some digging, I found it. It's another set of .xs scripts, these run on a native interpreter. There is also a native binary, aoa2sock, that bridges the gap between USB (AOA) and the .xs scripts by providing a pipe for the transfer protocol. It's clear that this phone update feature is an afterthought, the binaries/scripts are not part of the standard upgrade filesystem, they are installed separately from a .ipk package file (yellowtool.ipk) when the system is updated. The internal name they use is YellowTool / YellowBox. And this is the only part of the entire system that is coded with these .xs scripts, everything else is just native binaries. Most of the system uses native binaries and Qt applications The mobile update app feature uses .xs scripts Being plain text scripts, it was relatively easy to understand what the protocol does and what kind of access it provides, even though the coding style is atrocious. Constructing The Backdoor At this point, just by reading the code, I was pretty sure that it was possible to write arbitrary files under the /navi directory, and that would give me full access if I carefully modified some files. I just needed to create a fake Android update app and connect using AOA. Well, as I said before, I'm not an Android developer, so I went with the next best thing, the Linux Kernel. As it turns out I'm also not a kernel developer... But I knew that it has something called gadget mode, where a device running Linux can act as a USB peripheral (instead of a host). Could I make a Raspberry Pi act as an Android device in AOA mode? Gadget mode can be configured from userspace using configfs (just by writing specific /sys/kernel/config/ files), this way does not require writing any kernel code, but it's limited to specific "functions" already implemented in the kernel (e.g. serial port, mass storage, ethernet adapter etc). Not unsurprisingly, that's how the guys at Google implemented AOA, they added a new "accessory" function to the kernel. They even tried to push it upstream, but it went nowhere, currently, it's not part of the Linux Kernel. I don't think it will ever be, it's probably too specific, and it's kind of a weird protocol. After reading more about AOA, it was clear that it involved a kind of handshake where the accessory asks the Android device for AOA, and after that, the device just acts like a serial port (a "raw" data pipe), and it's up to the developer to do the rest (this is a simplification, and there are other modes, read more). So maybe I could use the serial gadget function to fake an Android device already in accessory mode, without implementing the handshake. I also found the talk where they first announced AOA, back in 2011. It's a nice talk if you are into USB stuff: The Testing Setup The system is something like this: Android side: Update App / "nftp" (.xs scripts) <=> AOA <=> USB Head unit side: USB (host) <=> aoa2sock <=> "nftp" (.xs scripts) <=> [reads/writes system files] For testing, I used 2 Raspberry Pies. Because the head unit is ARM-based as is the Raspberry Pi, I was able to run the aoa2sock binary and .xs interpreter from the firmware, this simulated the head unit and acted like a USB host. The other RPi was the USB peripheral (using the On-The-Go, OTG port), which when configured correctly using the gadget mode, acted like an Android device in AOA mode. The smaller Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W can be powered from the OTG port and will act as the Android device After messing about with multiple gadget configurations, I was seeing some promising debug messages from aoa2sock, that's the binary extracted from the firmware that creates a pipe between the USB AOA and the weird "nftp" protocol (.xs scripts), on the head unit side. But it was not working... "No AOA endpoint was found": My fake head unit was not recognizing my fake Android device >: file aoa2sock aoa2sock: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, EABI5 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=XXXXXXXX, with debug_info, not stripped After inspecting the aoa2sock binary in Ghidra (thanks for the debug info) and reading the kernel code, I finally found the issue. The kernel serial port gadget uses a different USB subclass from the one used by AOA, and it can't be changed from userspace. Is this a bug? I think AOA is correct in using USB_SUBCLASS_VENDOR_SPEC for a generic interface OK... Let's patch the kernel I ended up having to download the kernel source and patch the f_serial.c gadget function to change the USB subclass. After compiling the kernel module and loading it using modprobe, it finally worked and the aoa2sock binary recognized the device. My fake Android device was finally connected to my fake head unit Can I call myself a kernel developer now? All that was left to do was to somehow recreate that "nftp" protocol. I didn't really want to use the proprietary .xs files implementation, so I wrote my own in Python. At this point, I had all the pieces and the Raspberry Pi now replaced the Android app: Raspberry Pi side: Python Script ("nftp" implementation) <=> USB Gadget Mode (emulates AOA) Head unit side (same as before): USB (host) <=> aoa2sock <=> "nftp" (.xs scripts) <=> [reads/writes system files] Creating the backdoor involved issuing "nftp" commands to edit a specific file under the /navi directory and inject a call to a bash script, this bash script (also uploaded using "nftp") contains the payload that runs as root. H4cking Time After much testing with my dual RPi setup, I was confident that it was going to work... Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W (OTG port) connected to the infotainment head unit Setting up for an update... Ready to "Update with Phone", that option is only available after version 6.0.10.2 Waiting for a phone Time to put the RPi in gadget mode (I was connected to it using SSH)... Sorry, it's not a phone and we are not sending any maps Sending and running the payload... Got it! Success! I had root access. That payload is just call to a specific D-Bus method that I found while analyzing the firmware, it shows a popup with custom text and title. The text is the output of the id command. Finally, after replacing the payload with something more useful, a simple socat bind shell and connecting back to it using Wi-Fi, I had full access. Give me that root shell If you didn't follow it all the way, here's a summary: I used a Raspberry Pi in USB gadget mode to simulate an Android device connected to the head unit. The head unit thinks it's accepting a navigation maps update from the "phone", but because the update protocol allows for arbitrary file changes, I can issue commands to modify a specific file and inject a call to a bash script that gets run as root. Code Please Everything is on GitHub with more detailed instructions (it contains no proprietary code). The key pieces are my implementation of the "nftp" protocol and the gadget configuration. What's Next? This is just the beginning, now it's time to really explore the system. First, I'll probably end up restoring the autorun.sh functionality, with a custom service, because I think that's the easiest way to load software. That way I can keep all the new stuff on the drive and make as few changes to the system as possible. One of the main things I would like to do is record car parameters, stuff like speed, fuel, location etc. It remains to be seen if I can easily access that information through D-Bus, or if I need to go deeper. I'm not interested in adding anything that requires my attention while driving. But that's for another time... Some Extras (Could I have used SSH?) Two ports are open by default on the head unit, an SSH server, and some Apple service, probably related to CarPlay (Server: AirTunes/320.17.6), I didn't really explore that. But I tried cracking the /etc/shadow root password from the update file using hashcat / john with some rules and password lists. I'm not an expert doing this at all, I don't even know if I was doing it right, and was not successful. Not that it matters now, I could just change the root password or add a new user. SSH on port 22 / AirTunes/320.17.6 on port 7000 Sursa: https://goncalomb.com/blog/2024/01/30/f57cf19b-how-i-also-hacked-my-car

E un forum de security, simte-te liber sa postezi mai multe detalii. Mie cel putin imi plac lucrurile tehnice de orice fel, atat "attack" cat si "defense". Eu ma refeream ca pe placa de baza poti avea componente in plus, implanturi, care pot face destul de multe lucruri, cel mai simplu ar fi nu accesul la procesor (ca nu are sens), ci la memorie, sau la datele care se plimba pe acolo. Astfel de lucruri nu sunt imposibil de prins dar foarte dificil. Si nu cred ca sunt multi care isi fac custom hardware. Uite doar un exemplu, desigur mai mult teoretic, la care ma refeream: https://cs-people.bu.edu/tromer/acoustic/ - This is hacking.

Inventezi masina timpului, mergi 5-10 ani in trecut, cumperi cryptocurrencies (crypto == CRYPTOGRAPHY, sunteti pe un forum de security, bha), profit.

Side-channel attacks. Trebuie sa invatati hardware ca cine stie ce face acel mic chip de pe placa, cine stie cum WiFi trimite date. Snowden leaks au aratat multe lucruri misto. Inclusiv monitorizare "remote" (de la mica distanta) folosind undele electromagnetica de la cablu VGA. V-am zis mai sus care e singura solutie.

Inteleg idee, oricum, pana la urma, daca cineva e destul de motivat, poate afla orice bit de pe orice tip de hardware. Dar care ar fi scopul? In primul rand inteleg paranoia, dar atunci cand e cazul. Daca sunteti presedinti sau persoane importante, daca faceti infractiuni de milioane de dolari, daca controlati corporatii de miliarde de dolari sau mai stiu eu ce, da, aveti grija. Dar... chiar e cazul? Un lucru pe care il puteti face e sa monitorizati traficul, paranoic vorbind, la un alt layer, nu de pe hardware-ul care il genereaza. Sunt destul de sigur ca nu o sa vedeti mare lucru. Exista reverse engineering la orice fel de software, iar cu niste skill-uri bune de hardware... Ca sa nu mai zic ca probabil nu compilati voi acele sisteme de operare si toate programele care ruleaza. Asta, desigur, dupa ce faceti code review la cateva sute de milioane de linii de cod. Solutia mai simpla si care functioneaza 100% e sa nu mai folositi deloc tehnologia.

Au trecut 20 de ani si valcenii mei nu au evoluat deloc

Nu gasesti DBs si sanse mici si pentru liste. Cauta CVE-urile pentru escape-uri si le cauti ulterior pe GitHub. Vezi pe cele populare: VMWare, VirtualBox, Parallels si care ma sunt. Daca vrei sa extinzi poti sa incluzi si dockere, unde nu e VM escape dar e "prin apropiere". Poate fi un subiect complicat daca e sa le si analizezi...

Nu au existat niciodata, au fost doar ceva scammeri, multi au fost saltati, au ramas putini cu ceva bani dar nu tocmai averi care s-au dus pe masini si altele clasice.

Sunt curios cum a fost spart acest cont. A patit si varu-meo (nu e tehnic). Metoda e simpla: a primit un mail sau SMS cu un cod si l-a trimis cuiva. Ca na, i-l ceruse cineva... Dar la el a mers sa foloseasca acel mail in care Facebook il intreba "Was this you?" - cand a fost accesat contul. Atacatorul, aka cine stie ce bot, a incercat sa schimbe adresa de mail dar a trebuit confirmare si nu a facut-o. Tehnica secreta pe care a folosit-o? A citit acel email. Mai am rude si prieteni care au tot felul de probleme similare, dar in niciunul dintre cazuri nu a fost cine stie ce atac sofisticat, deci isi cam merita soarta. Si nu merita timpul meu sau al altcuiva, isi fac alt cont si gata.

Total de acord, democratia va decide prin numarul de voturi. Dar acest proces electoral are si el niste reguli, iar cei care nu le respecta ar trebui sa iasa din joc. Asa cum la fotbal iei cartonas rosu cand dai la picioare, asa si aici cand se dovedeste ca ai facut campanie de milioane si tu ai declarat ca 0. Daca eu nu imi declar banii la ANAF, vine ANAF-ul peste mine, de ce ar fi CG mai presus decat mine? Dar da, cu renumararea voturilor, CCR si alte lucruri, nu functioneaza pe baza de merite ci pe numiri politice. Ca o buna parte din Romania. Problema e aceeasi de 35 de ani, aceiasi oameni in spate cum ziceam mai sus. Nu inteleg de ce vedeti asa rau Europa si SUA. Eu de cand ma stiu toti banii pe care i-am facut au venit din EU si SUA. Probabil si la voi e la fel. Banuiesc ca nu aveti toti Logan-uri sau Lada. Oare de ce? Pana si serveru RST e prin Franta. Singura explicatie pe care o gasesc e ceea ce vad la tata de ani de zile: Romania TV, Realitatea si Antena 3. Aceleasi cuvinte "cheie" in discursurile tuturor. Sugestia mea e sa incercati sa diversificati sursele de informare. Da, eu m-am uitat cateva zile la Realitatea Plus care il promoveaza pe CG sa vad ce argumente au. Si nu prea au. Au aratat niste "documente" intr-un Google Drive ca cine stie ce ar fi. Normal, parintii mei nu stiu ce e ala si cred ca sunt cine stie ce documente oficiale. Partea asta cu manipularea e importanta. De exemplu eu am fost la protestul din 10 august de acum ceva ani impotriva lui Dragnea. La Antena 3 au zis ca protestatarii au primit 50 de RON ca sa fie acolo. Pentru 50 de RON nu ma ridic din pat. Am fost acolo cu oameni cu familii si cu venituri mari. Tata nu m-a crezut pe mine, l-a crezut pe Gadea. Atat de departe se duce. Acum canalele sunt altele: Tik Tok, Facebook etc. Exemplu de cat de usor poate fi. Levi nu cred ca e mare hacker si a facut asta fara probleme. Ceva imi zice ca nu e singurul.

Dupa cum zici tu, nu e vina UE, e vina romanilor. Da, nu a celor de la PSD si PNL ca si-au facut averi si au spart bani intre ei, ci ai romanilor ca i-au votat timp de 35 de ani. CG nu e Pro UE cand urmarind videoclipuri cu el de acum 2-3 ani vezi ca e fan Rusia. Sputnik a scris ca e sustinator rus, asta nu am vazut in vreo stire ci am verificat eu. Cat despre CG, nu doar asta e problema, ci ca e si retardat, la fel ca nevasta-sa. Zice ca s-a intalnit cu o civilizatie care nu e umana, ca apa are informatii, daca o imbuteliezi nu mai are si o gramada de alte bazaconii pe care nici Andrei de la Insula Iubirii nu le putea scoate nici pe LSD. Sa nu mai zic ca trebuie sa purtam fuste ca din pamant vine energia sau ce sloboz zicea nevasta-sa aia. Sa fim seriosi, daca ar stii toate lucrurile astea, nu ar mai vota nimeni cu el, dar in "reclamele" de pe tik tok nu apare nimic negativ. Si asa cum daca vezi o reclama la un produs nu te arunci sa il cumperi ci iti pierzi putin timp sa vezi review-uri, asa nu ar trebui nici sa votezi, doar ca ai vazut un filmulet cu un Gigel si ca pare de treaba sau ca pare destept sau mai stiu eu ce. Si Floricica Dansatoarea daca se imbraca mai elegant si citeste un discurs pare la fel. Tara merge prost pentru ca unii sa o duca bine, asa a fost mereu. Si aici discutia e foarte lunga si nu are rost. De aceea inteleg perfect nevoie de schimbare, dar daca facem o schimbare, sa nu alegem un nebun sa ne conduca si sa ne reprezinte. Cel putin sa ne mai documentam inainte de a pune acea stampila, ca nu votam un concurent la Puterea Dragostei ci ne alegem presedintele.

Te referi la ceva ransomware care a fost pe la ceva centrala de la noi? Nu e un atac targetat. Zilnic, de prin toata lumea, ruleaza scanaere ce cauta diferite probleme pe tot Internetul, indiferent de tara destinatie. Si cand se poate exploata ceva, poc, se pune un ransomware sa iasa ceva profit. Daca ne-ar ataca Rusia sau un alt stat nu ar face asa ceva, ar fi mai ascuns, nu ar vrea sa fie detectat si ar urmari ceva concret, gen sa poata pica curentul prin tara, la nevoie. Ar avea niste motive prin care sa "profite". Oricum, statul roman nu face prea multe in aceasta privinta. Firmele private platesc bani buni (unora dintre noi de asemenea) pentru a le testa, a descoperi vulnerabilitati care ulterior sunt reparate. La stat nu cred ca s-a facut niciodata nimic. Dar nu va faceti griji, nu au cum sa va fure datele din baza de date ca baza de date este pe hartie.

Nu stiu de ce ar fi cineva pro Rusia sau anti UE cand nu stiu pe nimeni care macar sa fii vizitat Rusia. Sau alte locuri. Dar la munca in EUROPA, plin de romani. Ma intreb de ce... Si sincer, ma mira de ce l-ar vota pe Georgescu. Am rude fix pe ramura asta: fara studii superioare, plecate la munca in EUROPA, active pe tiktok (unde nu urmaresc academicieni) si care il promoveaza pe Georgescu.

Ai primit niste mail-uri cu "Was this you?"

"Hackerii" din Valcea cumparau sandvisuri aurolacilor in net cafe-uri ca sa intre pe anunturi si sa copieze adrese de mail. Aka un bot de 15 linii de cod in Python nu erau in stare sa faca.

Forta videochatiste, aduc bani in tara ❤️