Jump to content

u0m3

Active Members
  • Posts

    543
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Posts posted by u0m3

  1. Error code 87 is invalid parameter

    ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER
    87 (0x57)
    The parameter is incorrect.

    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms681382(v=vs.85).aspx

     

    When dealing with GetLastError this is helpful https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms680582(v=vs.85).aspx. Just keep in mind it uses some fancy macro tricks to abstract the use of char vs wchar_t for storing strings. In your case, if you don't just use the code (which will use MessageBox to display the error) you should substitute the macro stuff so the resulting string can be used with printf (or alternatively use _tprintf which uses the same abstraction).

     

    Now regarding the cause of the error: my first suspect is GetProcessID; you never check if it returns a valid value. Second on the list is the flag PROCESS_CREATE_THREAD as it is restricted: 

    Quote

    The following specific access rights are not allowed from a process to a protected process:

    [...]

    PROCESS_CREATE_THREAD

    [...]

    as specified https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms684880(v=vs.85).aspx (bottom of page). You never specified what operating system you are using, so if you are using Windows Vista or above (which is quite probable) you should try to run the injector as administrator (if you are not doing that already).

  2. Pai trebuie sa specifici si website-ul pe care ai problema. Sau request-ul, etc.

    Iar din cate am citit, creatorul bibliotecii Incapsula a zis ca nu poate sa intretina biblioteca.

    Avand in vedere ca post-ul de pe StackOverflow e din 2016 s-ar putea sa fi schimbat "provider-ul" (nu stiu cum sa il denumesc, e un fel de CloudFlare) ceva in API-urile lor, facand obsolete biblioteca python.

  3. 39 minutes ago, Hannock said:

    [...] it shows error 87 [...]

    Can you be more specific? Where, during the execution, does it encounter this error?

    Also in SetDebugPriviledge, your call to AdjustTokenPrivileges is off: it should be 

    AdjustTokenPrivileges(hToken, FALSE, &tp, sizeof(TOKEN_PRIVILEGES), (PTOKEN_PRIVILEGES) NULL, (PDWORD) NULL)

    as per https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa375202(v=vs.85).aspx and https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa446619(v=vs.85).aspx (casting is optional).

     

    Try adding some break-points or debug statements to check the variables or return codes.

    • Upvote 2
  4. Depinde de cum e generat: daca e ceva server-side nu prea ai ce face (mai ales daca e generat server-side pe baza unor date, la care nu ai tu acces, asociate cu sesiunea). Si fiind un hash, cel mai probabil SHA-2 sau SHA-3, nu ai cum sa il decodezi sau sa il bruteforce (sau nu fara research serios).

    Acum dupa o scurta cautare cu google dupa header-ul minune am gasit niste niste post-uri pe StackOverflow in care se discuta despre un website de scoruri live, protejat prin aceeasi metoda. Si la prima vedere ar parea ca baiatul asta a gasit o solutie https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38618483/incapsula-module-issue-with-xhr-request. Nu am timp acum sa stau sa testez, vezi si tu daca te ajuta cu ceva.

    • Upvote 1
  5. Da era un stall initial de ~500ms + ~600ms SSL. Acum in medie dureaza 1.75s pana la finish (~900ms DOM, ~1.35 Load).

    Din Magurele, Ilfov, pe RDS, cu un client de torrent deschis la seed. Dar daca vrei pot testa mai tarziu si din alte locatii.

    • Upvote 1
  6. DOMContentLoaded: 2.24

    Load: 2.64

    Finish: 2.97

     

    In consola:

    common.js:37 Uncaught ReferenceError: $ is not defined
        at common.js:37
    (anonymous) @ common.js:37
    content.js:125 Uncaught ReferenceError: $ is not defined
        at content.js:125
    (anonymous) @ content.js:125
    (index):1 The resource https://cdn.polyfill.io/ was preloaded using link preload but not used within a few seconds from the window's load event. Please make sure it wasn't preloaded for nothing.

     

  7. Probabil dupa doua saptamani nu mai ajuta cu nimic, dar din nefericire nu am avut timp sa ma joc cu asta pana acum.

    Am facut o implementare MVVM pe baza ce aveai tu acolo cu un Message Hub ca sa schimb View-urile.

    Fiecare View e un UserControl, iar in MainWindow ai un (sau mai bine zis o serie de) DataTemplate care asociaza ViewModel-ul cu View-ul. Singura buba e ca ViewModel-ul e refolosit ceea ce nu e tocmai optim mereu.

    Sper sa nu fie prea imbarligat ce am facut acolo. Daca ai nelamuriri am sa incerc sa iti explic.

     

    https://bitbucket.org/radualexandrupopescu/mediivizuale-wisemarius/overview

  8. MVVM este destul de complicat de implementat folosind WPF doar. Mai ales pentru aplicatii cat de cat complexe.

    Personal prefer sa folosesct Prism (samples) pentru a simplifica lucrurile. Acum nu sunt sigur ca ai voie avand in vedere ca este o tema.

    Daca am timp am sa ma uit maine peste proiect, dar nu promit nimic.

     

    Si, daca imi permiti, un sfat pentru viitor: foloseste .gitignore; nu orice fisier generat in proiect trebuie sa ajunga in repo.

    • Upvote 1
  9. 8 hours ago, adicode said:

    1Kb(Kilobyte) = 1024 biti.

    1KB = 1024 bytes
    1Kb (Kilobit) = 1024 biti = 128 bytes

     

    Si ca sa fie totul mai distractiv, uneori se folosesc multiplii de 1024 (care este 2 la puterea 10) iar alteori multiplii de 1000 (10 la puterea 3). In general pentru hard-disk-uri se folosesc multiplii de 1000.

    Ca atare unele persoane/programe/etc folosesc notatii diferite pentru a le distinge:

    1 KB = 1000 Bytes
    1 MB = 1000 KB = 1000000 B
    1 GB = 1000 MB = 1000000 KB = 1000000000 B
    ...
    
    1 KiB = 1024 Bytes
    1 MiB = 1024 KiB = 1048576 B
    1 GiB = 1024 MiB = 1048576 KiB = 1073741824 B
    ...
  10. Am facut un mic demo cu hashcat ca sa vezi timpii de spargere pe un echipament relativ modest (o placa video AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series  mai concret  Asus EAH6870; ceea ce este modest in comparatie cu asta  https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6225-post-33393.html#pid33393 )

    Spoiler
    
    **********************************************************************
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:02:55+02
    hashcat (v3.40) starting...
    
    * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss
                 You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
    OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    ================================================
    * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU
    * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz, skipped
    
    Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
    Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
    
    Applicable Optimizers:
    * Zero-Byte
    * Precompute-Init
    * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard
    * Meet-In-The-Middle
    * Early-Skip
    * Not-Salted
    * Not-Iterated
    * Single-Hash
    * Single-Salt
    * Brute-Force
    * Raw-Hash
    
    Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
    Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c
    
    The wordlist or mask you are using is too small.
    Therefore, hashcat is unable to utilize the full parallelization power of your device(s).
    The cracking speed will drop.
    Workaround: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed
    
    INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted
    
    
    Session..........: hashcat
    Status...........: Cracked
    Hash.Type........: MD5
    Hash.Target......: 92cd8d45130b33c5461f6c4ebc8fa8f3
    Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:02:59 2017 (0 secs)
    Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:02:59 2017 (0 secs)
    Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1 [4]
    Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined
    Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
    Speed.Dev.#1.....: 22534.7 kH/s (0.34ms)
    Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts
    Progress.........: 158184/456976 (34.62%)
    Rejected.........: 0/158184 (0.00%)
    Restore.Point....: 0/17576 (0.00%)
    Candidates.#1....: lari -> jqgq
    HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 66c Fan: 33% Util:  0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16
    
    Started: Tue Mar 21 01:02:55 2017
    Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:00 2017
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:00+02
    **********************************************************************
    **********************************************************************
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:00+02
    hashcat (v3.40) starting...
    
    * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss
                 You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
    OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    ================================================
    * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU
    * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz, skipped
    
    Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
    Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
    
    Applicable Optimizers:
    * Zero-Byte
    * Precompute-Init
    * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard
    * Meet-In-The-Middle
    * Early-Skip
    * Not-Salted
    * Not-Iterated
    * Single-Hash
    * Single-Salt
    * Brute-Force
    * Raw-Hash
    
    Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
    Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c
    
    The wordlist or mask you are using is too small.
    Therefore, hashcat is unable to utilize the full parallelization power of your device(s).
    The cracking speed will drop.
    Workaround: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed
    
    INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted
    
    
    Session..........: hashcat
    Status...........: Cracked
    Hash.Type........: MD5
    Hash.Target......: c80a60e335f0451349bffe77d61f0b1b
    Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:06 2017 (0 secs)
    Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:06 2017 (0 secs)
    Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1 [5]
    Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined
    Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
    Speed.Dev.#1.....:   120.5 MH/s (8.00ms)
    Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts
    Progress.........: 5483712/11881376 (46.15%)
    Rejected.........: 0/5483712 (0.00%)
    Restore.Point....: 0/456976 (0.00%)
    Candidates.#1....: darin -> gqgqz
    HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 68c Fan: 33% Util:  0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16
    
    Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:00 2017
    Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:06 2017
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:07+02
    **********************************************************************
    **********************************************************************
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:07+02
    hashcat (v3.40) starting...
    
    * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss
                 You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
    OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    ================================================
    * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU
    * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz, skipped
    
    Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
    Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
    
    Applicable Optimizers:
    * Zero-Byte
    * Precompute-Init
    * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard
    * Meet-In-The-Middle
    * Early-Skip
    * Not-Salted
    * Not-Iterated
    * Single-Hash
    * Single-Salt
    * Brute-Force
    * Raw-Hash
    
    Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
    Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c
    
    
    Session..........: hashcat
    Status...........: Cracked
    Hash.Type........: MD5
    Hash.Target......: f70e537a7a8397d3b8e43e3026ea8824
    Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:11 2017 (0 secs)
    Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:11 2017 (0 secs)
    Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1 [6]
    Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined
    Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
    Speed.Dev.#1.....:  3060.2 MH/s (10.48ms)
    Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts
    Progress.........: 154140672/308915776 (49.90%)
    Rejected.........: 0/154140672 (0.00%)
    Restore.Point....: 0/456976 (0.00%)
    Candidates.#1....: qlnder -> pweqlv
    HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 69c Fan: 33% Util:  0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16
    
    Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:07 2017
    Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:13 2017
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:14+02
    **********************************************************************
    **********************************************************************
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:14+02
    hashcat (v3.40) starting...
    
    * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss
                 You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
    OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    ================================================
    * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU
    * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz, skipped
    
    Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
    Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
    
    Applicable Optimizers:
    * Zero-Byte
    * Precompute-Init
    * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard
    * Early-Skip
    * Not-Iterated
    * Single-Hash
    * Single-Salt
    * Brute-Force
    
    Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
    Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c
    
    INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted
    
    
    Session..........: hashcat
    Status...........: Cracked
    Hash.Type........: md5(md5($pass))
    Hash.Target......: 6cbf7131b2b73859ecb7925b64d8b9e6
    Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:18 2017 (1 sec)
    Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:19 2017 (0 secs)
    Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1 [6]
    Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined
    Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
    Speed.Dev.#1.....:   629.2 MH/s (8.51ms)
    Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts
    Progress.........: 291393856/308915776 (94.33%)
    Rejected.........: 0/291393856 (0.00%)
    Restore.Point....: 372736/456976 (81.57%)
    Candidates.#1....: ssnoux -> xhqfqg
    HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 70c Fan: 33% Util:  0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16
    
    Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:14 2017
    Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:20 2017
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:20+02
    **********************************************************************
    **********************************************************************
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:20+02
    hashcat (v3.40) starting...
    
    * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss
                 You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
    OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    ================================================
    * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU
    * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz, skipped
    
    Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
    Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
    
    Applicable Optimizers:
    * Zero-Byte
    * Precompute-Init
    * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard
    * Meet-In-The-Middle
    * Early-Skip
    * Not-Salted
    * Not-Iterated
    * Single-Hash
    * Single-Salt
    * Brute-Force
    * Raw-Hash
    
    Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
    Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c
    
    The wordlist or mask you are using is too small.
    Therefore, hashcat is unable to utilize the full parallelization power of your device(s).
    The cracking speed will drop.
    Workaround: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed
    
    INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted
    
    
    Session..........: hashcat
    Status...........: Cracked
    Hash.Type........: MD5
    Hash.Target......: 85b0fc46a8eee36b530fbccfe1676891
    Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:24 2017 (0 secs)
    Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:24 2017 (0 secs)
    Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?d [6]
    Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined
    Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
    Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2788.8 MH/s (5.42ms)
    Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts
    Progress.........: 19685120/118813760 (16.57%)
    Rejected.........: 0/19685120 (0.00%)
    Restore.Point....: 0/175760 (0.00%)
    Candidates.#1....: sande1 -> tiqfq8
    HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 70c Fan: 33% Util:  0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16
    
    Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:20 2017
    Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:26 2017
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:26+02
    **********************************************************************
    **********************************************************************
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:26+02
    hashcat (v3.40) starting...
    
    * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss
                 You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
    OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    ================================================
    * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU
    * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz, skipped
    
    Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
    Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
    
    Applicable Optimizers:
    * Zero-Byte
    * Precompute-Init
    * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard
    * Meet-In-The-Middle
    * Early-Skip
    * Not-Salted
    * Not-Iterated
    * Single-Hash
    * Single-Salt
    * Brute-Force
    * Raw-Hash
    
    Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
    Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c
    
    
    Session..........: hashcat
    Status...........: Cracked
    Hash.Type........: MD5
    Hash.Target......: 31ec1bc10fee2c86270b3bf547c0d416
    Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:30 2017 (1 sec)
    Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:31 2017 (0 secs)
    Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 [7]
    Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined
    Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
    Speed.Dev.#1.....:  3176.5 MH/s (8.36ms)
    Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts
    Progress.........: 1085263872/8031810176 (13.51%)
    Rejected.........: 0/1085263872 (0.00%)
    Restore.Point....: 0/456976 (0.00%)
    Candidates.#1....: oesanan -> jetcdxw
    HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 72c Fan: 33% Util:  0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16
    
    Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:26 2017
    Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:33 2017
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:33+02
    **********************************************************************
    **********************************************************************
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:33+02
    hashcat (v3.40) starting...
    
    * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss
                 You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
    OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    ================================================
    * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU
    * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz, skipped
    
    Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
    Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
    
    Applicable Optimizers:
    * Zero-Byte
    * Precompute-Init
    * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard
    * Meet-In-The-Middle
    * Early-Skip
    * Not-Salted
    * Not-Iterated
    * Single-Hash
    * Single-Salt
    * Brute-Force
    * Raw-Hash
    
    Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
    Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c
    
    Cracking performance lower than expected? Append -w 3 to the commandline!
    
    
    Session..........: hashcat
    Status...........: Cracked
    Hash.Type........: MD5
    Hash.Target......: 44673da6f35229a3850fc08b26e77b09
    Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:37 2017 (9 secs)
    Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:46 2017 (0 secs)
    Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?d [8]
    Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined
    Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
    Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2727.1 MH/s (8.39ms)
    Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts
    Progress.........: 25047801856/80318101760 (31.19%)
    Rejected.........: 0/25047801856 (0.00%)
    Restore.Point....: 1261568/4569760 (27.61%)
    Candidates.#1....: xpdzzpb0 -> hjrsjgn3
    HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 75c Fan: 50% Util: 91% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16
    
    Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:33 2017
    Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:48 2017
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:48+02
    **********************************************************************
    **********************************************************************
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:03:48+02
    hashcat (v3.40) starting...
    
    * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss
                 You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
    OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    ================================================
    * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU
    * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz, skipped
    
    Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
    Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
    
    Applicable Optimizers:
    * Zero-Byte
    * Precompute-Init
    * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard
    * Early-Skip
    * Not-Iterated
    * Single-Hash
    * Single-Salt
    * Brute-Force
    
    Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
    Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c
    
    Cracking performance lower than expected? Append -w 3 to the commandline!
    
    INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted
    
    Session..........: hashcat
    Status...........: Exhausted
    Hash.Type........: md5(md5($pass))
    Hash.Target......: 562ac68d5bc31d3764e65c3aa9281241
    Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:53 2017 (16 mins, 51 secs)
    Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:20:44 2017 (0 secs)
    Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?d?d [9]
    Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined
    Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
    Speed.Dev.#1.....:   751.5 MH/s (6.19ms)
    Recovered........: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
    Progress.........: 803181017600/803181017600 (100.00%)
    Rejected.........: 0/803181017600 (0.00%)
    Restore.Point....: 45697600/45697600 (100.00%)
    Candidates.#1....: yqgygqk64 -> xqgqzqg93
    HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 75c Fan: 83% Util: 88% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16
    
    Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:48 2017
    Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:20:46 2017
    >>>>    2017-03-21T01:20:46+02
    **********************************************************************

     

     
     
     
     
     

     

    Acesta este scriptul PowerShell folosit pentru a genera testele:

    Spoiler
    
    $hashes = @(
        [pscustomobject] @{
            hash = "92cd8d45130b33c5461f6c4ebc8fa8f3";
            chrs = "?l";
            type = 0;
            ksln = "?1" * 4;
        };
        [pscustomobject] @{
            hash = "c80a60e335f0451349bffe77d61f0b1b";
            chrs = "?l";
            type = 0;
            ksln = "?1" * 5;
        };
        [pscustomobject] @{
            hash = "f70e537a7a8397d3b8e43e3026ea8824";
            chrs = "?l";
            type = 0;
            ksln = "?1" * 6;
        };
        [pscustomobject] @{
            hash = "6cbf7131b2b73859ecb7925b64d8b9e6";
            chrs = "?l";
            type = 2600;
            ksln = "?1" * 6;
        };
        [pscustomobject] @{
            hash = "85b0fc46a8eee36b530fbccfe1676891";
            chrs = "?l";
            type = 0;
            ksln = "?1" * 5 + "?d";
        };
        [pscustomobject] @{
            hash = "31ec1bc10fee2c86270b3bf547c0d416";
            chrs = "?l";
            type = 0;
            ksln = "?1" * 7;
        };
        [pscustomobject] @{
            hash = "44673da6f35229a3850fc08b26e77b09";
            chrs = "?l";
            type = 0;
            ksln = "?1" * 7 + "?d";
        };
        [pscustomobject] @{
            hash = "562ac68d5bc31d3764e65c3aa9281241";
            chrs = "?l";
            type = 2600;
            ksln = "?1" * 7 + "?d?d";
        };
    );
    
    foreach($hashobj in $hashes) {
        Write-Output $("*" * 70);
        Get-Date -UFormat ">>>>    %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%Z" ;
        .\hashcat64.exe -o hashes-yoyois.txt --outfile-format=15 -a 3 -m $hashobj.type -1 $hashobj.chrs $hashobj.hash $hashobj.ksln
        Get-Date -UFormat ">>>>    %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%Z" ;
        Write-Output $("*" * 70);
    }

     

     
     
     
     
     

    Si acesta este output-ul din  hashes-yoyois.txt

    Spoiler
    
    92cd8d45130b33c5461f6c4ebc8fa8f3:lqbs:6c716273:
    c80a60e335f0451349bffe77d61f0b1b:grysy:6772797379:
    f70e537a7a8397d3b8e43e3026ea8824:sriwrb:737269777262:
    6cbf7131b2b73859ecb7925b64d8b9e6:fhbraz:66686272617a:
    85b0fc46a8eee36b530fbccfe1676891:pizmk5:70697a6d6b35:
    31ec1bc10fee2c86270b3bf547c0d416:saltjzh:73616c746a7a68:
    44673da6f35229a3850fc08b26e77b09:bskjzha7:62736b6a7a686137:
    

    Formatul este hash[:salt]:plain:hex_plain:crack_pos

     
     
     
     
    2

    Ultimul hash nu a fost spart probabil pentru ca nu e keyspace-ul sau hash-type-ul corect.

×
×
  • Create New...