-
Posts
543 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
25
Posts posted by u0m3
-
-
FemtoCell se accepta ca solutie?
-
Daca e cineva interesat de un articol care descrie relativ bine (a se citi "cu multe poze") cum se executa WCry: https://www.endgame.com/blog/wcrywanacry-ransomware-technical-analysis.
-
3
-
-
Quote
// To include server for FTP, HTTPS, and so on, use the string
// (ftp=http://<ProxyServerName>:80; https=https://<ProxyServerName>:80)
conform https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/226473/how-to-programmatically-query-and-set-proxy-settings-under-internet-explorer (ultimul exemplu din pagina).
Ca atare incearca
SetProxy("socks=address:port");
sau ceva in genul.
-
Error code 87 is invalid parameter
ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER 87 (0x57) The parameter is incorrect.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms681382(v=vs.85).aspx
When dealing with GetLastError this is helpful https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms680582(v=vs.85).aspx. Just keep in mind it uses some fancy macro tricks to abstract the use of char vs wchar_t for storing strings. In your case, if you don't just use the code (which will use MessageBox to display the error) you should substitute the macro stuff so the resulting string can be used with printf (or alternatively use _tprintf which uses the same abstraction).
Now regarding the cause of the error: my first suspect is GetProcessID; you never check if it returns a valid value. Second on the list is the flag PROCESS_CREATE_THREAD as it is restricted:
QuoteThe following specific access rights are not allowed from a process to a protected process:
[...]
PROCESS_CREATE_THREAD
[...]
as specified https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms684880(v=vs.85).aspx (bottom of page). You never specified what operating system you are using, so if you are using Windows Vista or above (which is quite probable) you should try to run the injector as administrator (if you are not doing that already).
-
Pai trebuie sa specifici si website-ul pe care ai problema. Sau request-ul, etc.
Iar din cate am citit, creatorul bibliotecii Incapsula a zis ca nu poate sa intretina biblioteca.
Avand in vedere ca post-ul de pe StackOverflow e din 2016 s-ar putea sa fi schimbat "provider-ul" (nu stiu cum sa il denumesc, e un fel de CloudFlare) ceva in API-urile lor, facand obsolete biblioteca python.
-
39 minutes ago, Hannock said:
[...] it shows error 87 [...]
Can you be more specific? Where, during the execution, does it encounter this error?
Also in SetDebugPriviledge, your call to AdjustTokenPrivileges is off: it should be
AdjustTokenPrivileges(hToken, FALSE, &tp, sizeof(TOKEN_PRIVILEGES), (PTOKEN_PRIVILEGES) NULL, (PDWORD) NULL)
as per https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa375202(v=vs.85).aspx and https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa446619(v=vs.85).aspx (casting is optional).
Try adding some break-points or debug statements to check the variables or return codes.
-
2
-
-
Depinde de cum e generat: daca e ceva server-side nu prea ai ce face (mai ales daca e generat server-side pe baza unor date, la care nu ai tu acces, asociate cu sesiunea). Si fiind un hash, cel mai probabil SHA-2 sau SHA-3, nu ai cum sa il decodezi sau sa il bruteforce (sau nu fara research serios).
Acum dupa o scurta cautare cu google dupa header-ul minune am gasit niste niste post-uri pe StackOverflow in care se discuta despre un website de scoruri live, protejat prin aceeasi metoda. Si la prima vedere ar parea ca baiatul asta a gasit o solutie https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38618483/incapsula-module-issue-with-xhr-request. Nu am timp acum sa stau sa testez, vezi si tu daca te ajuta cu ceva.
-
1
-
-
-
Da era un stall initial de ~500ms + ~600ms SSL. Acum in medie dureaza 1.75s pana la finish (~900ms DOM, ~1.35 Load).
Din Magurele, Ilfov, pe RDS, cu un client de torrent deschis la seed. Dar daca vrei pot testa mai tarziu si din alte locatii.
-
1
-
-
DOMContentLoaded: 2.24
Load: 2.64
Finish: 2.97
In consola:
common.js:37 Uncaught ReferenceError: $ is not defined at common.js:37 (anonymous) @ common.js:37 content.js:125 Uncaught ReferenceError: $ is not defined at content.js:125 (anonymous) @ content.js:125 (index):1 The resource https://cdn.polyfill.io/ was preloaded using link preload but not used within a few seconds from the window's load event. Please make sure it wasn't preloaded for nothing.
-
Probabil dupa doua saptamani nu mai ajuta cu nimic, dar din nefericire nu am avut timp sa ma joc cu asta pana acum.
Am facut o implementare MVVM pe baza ce aveai tu acolo cu un Message Hub ca sa schimb View-urile.
Fiecare View e un UserControl, iar in MainWindow ai un (sau mai bine zis o serie de) DataTemplate care asociaza ViewModel-ul cu View-ul. Singura buba e ca ViewModel-ul e refolosit ceea ce nu e tocmai optim mereu.
Sper sa nu fie prea imbarligat ce am facut acolo. Daca ai nelamuriri am sa incerc sa iti explic.
https://bitbucket.org/radualexandrupopescu/mediivizuale-wisemarius/overview
-
Imi cer scuze de offtopic, dar sunt nedumerit: ati facut integrare intre Discord si chat-ul forum-ului?
-
Slippery slope...
-
Pe scurt, nu poti.
-
Felicitari celor care au rezolvat. Nu mi-am dat seama de nici o culoare ca alea sunt numere prime. Si multumiri @sandabot pentru rezolvare.
-
1
-
-
MVVM este destul de complicat de implementat folosind WPF doar. Mai ales pentru aplicatii cat de cat complexe.
Personal prefer sa folosesct Prism (samples) pentru a simplifica lucrurile. Acum nu sunt sigur ca ai voie avand in vedere ca este o tema.
Daca am timp am sa ma uit maine peste proiect, dar nu promit nimic.
Si, daca imi permiti, un sfat pentru viitor: foloseste .gitignore; nu orice fisier generat in proiect trebuie sa ajunga in repo.
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, Usr6 said:
[...] te-ar ajuta mult daca ti-ai da seama ce reprezinta numerele de identificare al oualelor
And therein lays the rub.
-
8 hours ago, adicode said:
1Kb(Kilobyte) = 1024 biti.
1KB = 1024 bytes 1Kb (Kilobit) = 1024 biti = 128 bytes
Si ca sa fie totul mai distractiv, uneori se folosesc multiplii de 1024 (care este 2 la puterea 10) iar alteori multiplii de 1000 (10 la puterea 3). In general pentru hard-disk-uri se folosesc multiplii de 1000.
Ca atare unele persoane/programe/etc folosesc notatii diferite pentru a le distinge:
1 KB = 1000 Bytes 1 MB = 1000 KB = 1000000 B 1 GB = 1000 MB = 1000000 KB = 1000000000 B ... 1 KiB = 1024 Bytes 1 MiB = 1024 KiB = 1048576 B 1 GiB = 1024 MiB = 1048576 KiB = 1073741824 B ...
-
Ai o problema cu adresa (path-ul) unde sunt salvate sesiunile, la o prima vedere.
-
Trebuie sa explici putin mai concret ce vrei. DDoS e un concept destul de cumprinzator. Si din start ar fi problema primului "D" din DDoS deoarece vine de la Distributed.
-
1
-
-
Am facut un mic demo cu hashcat ca sa vezi timpii de spargere pe un echipament relativ modest (o placa video AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series mai concret Asus EAH6870; ceea ce este modest in comparatie cu asta https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6225-post-33393.html#pid33393 )
Spoiler********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:02:55+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c The wordlist or mask you are using is too small. Therefore, hashcat is unable to utilize the full parallelization power of your device(s). The cracking speed will drop. Workaround: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: 92cd8d45130b33c5461f6c4ebc8fa8f3 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:02:59 2017 (0 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:02:59 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1 [4] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 22534.7 kH/s (0.34ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 158184/456976 (34.62%) Rejected.........: 0/158184 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/17576 (0.00%) Candidates.#1....: lari -> jqgq HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 66c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:02:55 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:00 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:00+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:00+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c The wordlist or mask you are using is too small. Therefore, hashcat is unable to utilize the full parallelization power of your device(s). The cracking speed will drop. Workaround: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: c80a60e335f0451349bffe77d61f0b1b Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:06 2017 (0 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:06 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1 [5] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 120.5 MH/s (8.00ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 5483712/11881376 (46.15%) Rejected.........: 0/5483712 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/456976 (0.00%) Candidates.#1....: darin -> gqgqz HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 68c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:00 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:06 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:07+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:07+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: f70e537a7a8397d3b8e43e3026ea8824 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:11 2017 (0 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:11 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1 [6] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3060.2 MH/s (10.48ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 154140672/308915776 (49.90%) Rejected.........: 0/154140672 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/456976 (0.00%) Candidates.#1....: qlnder -> pweqlv HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 69c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:07 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:13 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:14+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:14+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Early-Skip * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: md5(md5($pass)) Hash.Target......: 6cbf7131b2b73859ecb7925b64d8b9e6 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:18 2017 (1 sec) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:19 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1 [6] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 629.2 MH/s (8.51ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 291393856/308915776 (94.33%) Rejected.........: 0/291393856 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 372736/456976 (81.57%) Candidates.#1....: ssnoux -> xhqfqg HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 70c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:14 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:20 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:20+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:20+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c The wordlist or mask you are using is too small. Therefore, hashcat is unable to utilize the full parallelization power of your device(s). The cracking speed will drop. Workaround: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: 85b0fc46a8eee36b530fbccfe1676891 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:24 2017 (0 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:24 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?d [6] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2788.8 MH/s (5.42ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 19685120/118813760 (16.57%) Rejected.........: 0/19685120 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/175760 (0.00%) Candidates.#1....: sande1 -> tiqfq8 HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 70c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:20 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:26 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:26+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:26+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: 31ec1bc10fee2c86270b3bf547c0d416 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:30 2017 (1 sec) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:31 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 [7] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3176.5 MH/s (8.36ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 1085263872/8031810176 (13.51%) Rejected.........: 0/1085263872 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/456976 (0.00%) Candidates.#1....: oesanan -> jetcdxw HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 72c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:26 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:33 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:33+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:33+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c Cracking performance lower than expected? Append -w 3 to the commandline! Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: 44673da6f35229a3850fc08b26e77b09 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:37 2017 (9 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:46 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?d [8] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2727.1 MH/s (8.39ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 25047801856/80318101760 (31.19%) Rejected.........: 0/25047801856 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 1261568/4569760 (27.61%) Candidates.#1....: xpdzzpb0 -> hjrsjgn3 HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 75c Fan: 50% Util: 91% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:33 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:48 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:48+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:48+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Early-Skip * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c Cracking performance lower than expected? Append -w 3 to the commandline! INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Exhausted Hash.Type........: md5(md5($pass)) Hash.Target......: 562ac68d5bc31d3764e65c3aa9281241 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:53 2017 (16 mins, 51 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:20:44 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?d?d [9] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 751.5 MH/s (6.19ms) Recovered........: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.........: 803181017600/803181017600 (100.00%) Rejected.........: 0/803181017600 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 45697600/45697600 (100.00%) Candidates.#1....: yqgygqk64 -> xqgqzqg93 HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 75c Fan: 83% Util: 88% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:48 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:20:46 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:20:46+02 **********************************************************************
Acesta este scriptul PowerShell folosit pentru a genera testele:
Spoiler$hashes = @( [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "92cd8d45130b33c5461f6c4ebc8fa8f3"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 4; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "c80a60e335f0451349bffe77d61f0b1b"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 5; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "f70e537a7a8397d3b8e43e3026ea8824"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 6; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "6cbf7131b2b73859ecb7925b64d8b9e6"; chrs = "?l"; type = 2600; ksln = "?1" * 6; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "85b0fc46a8eee36b530fbccfe1676891"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 5 + "?d"; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "31ec1bc10fee2c86270b3bf547c0d416"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 7; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "44673da6f35229a3850fc08b26e77b09"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 7 + "?d"; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "562ac68d5bc31d3764e65c3aa9281241"; chrs = "?l"; type = 2600; ksln = "?1" * 7 + "?d?d"; }; ); foreach($hashobj in $hashes) { Write-Output $("*" * 70); Get-Date -UFormat ">>>> %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%Z" ; .\hashcat64.exe -o hashes-yoyois.txt --outfile-format=15 -a 3 -m $hashobj.type -1 $hashobj.chrs $hashobj.hash $hashobj.ksln Get-Date -UFormat ">>>> %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%Z" ; Write-Output $("*" * 70); }
Si acesta este output-ul din hashes-yoyois.txt
Spoiler92cd8d45130b33c5461f6c4ebc8fa8f3:lqbs:6c716273: c80a60e335f0451349bffe77d61f0b1b:grysy:6772797379: f70e537a7a8397d3b8e43e3026ea8824:sriwrb:737269777262: 6cbf7131b2b73859ecb7925b64d8b9e6:fhbraz:66686272617a: 85b0fc46a8eee36b530fbccfe1676891:pizmk5:70697a6d6b35: 31ec1bc10fee2c86270b3bf547c0d416:saltjzh:73616c746a7a68: 44673da6f35229a3850fc08b26e77b09:bskjzha7:62736b6a7a686137:
Formatul este hash[:salt]:plain:hex_plain:crack_pos
2Ultimul hash nu a fost spart probabil pentru ca nu e keyspace-ul sau hash-type-ul corect.
-
-
Felicitari! Si foarte util acel site https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/
-
2
-
-
Studiu PSY - HACKING
in Off-topic
Posted
Done.
De curiozitate, cand vom putea vedea rezultatlele?