u0m3
-
Posts
543 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
25
Posts posted by u0m3
-
-
-
Felicitari! Si foarte util acel site https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/
-
2
-
-
-
Daca te referi la ping-ul clasic, din cate stiu eu, foloseste protocolul ICMP (care este OSI Layer 3 aka Network Layer, desi e incapsulat in IPv4), deci nu are port (din cate stiu eu, doar protocoalele din OSI Layer 4 aka Transport Layer au port, sau cel putin cand e vorba de TCP/UDP).
Daca te referi la TCP/UDP ping, atunci presupun ca e implementation specific.
Just my 2cents.
-
#include <stdio.h> int min(int vlen, int* v) { int min = v[0]; // assume vlen > 0 // loop over vector and if we find a // smaller value than the current // smallest value, that becomens // the new minimum for(int i = 1; i < vlen; ++i) if(v[i] < min) min = v[i]; return min; } int max(int vlen, int* v) { int max = v[0]; // assume vlen > 0 // loop over vector and if we find a // bigger value than the current // biggest value, that becomens // the new maximum for(int i = 1; i < vlen; ++i) if(v[i] > max) max = v[i]; return max; } int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { // Variables int xlen; // x length int ylen; // y length int x[50]; int y[50]; int xmin; int xmax; int ymin; int ymax; // Read xlen printf("Introduceti dimensiunea masivului X (maxim 50): "); scanf("%d", &xlen); // Read x for(int i = 0; i < xlen; ++x) { printf("x[%d] = ", i); scanf("%d", &x[i]); } // Read ylen printf("Introduceti dimensiunea masivului Y (maxim 50): "); scanf("%d", &ylen); // Read y for(int i = 0; i < ylen; ++x) { printf("y[%d] = ", i); scanf("%d", &y[i]); } // Find mins and maxs xmin = min(xlen, x); xmax = max(xlen, x); ymin = min(ylen, y); ymax = max(ylen, y); // Check for division by 0 if(ymax - xmin == 0) printf("Eroare: impartire la 0!\n"); else printf("z = (xmax - ymin) / (ymax - xmin) = %d", (xmax - ymin) / (ymax - xmin)); return 0; }
-
2
-
-
Poti da mai multe detalii? Ce sistem de operare / versiune server RDP, ce versiune de client merge si ce versiune nu merge, ce configuratie are serverul RDP (ce setari, nu configuratia fizica hardware), ce client ai incercat pe kali, configuratia retelei...
Sunt multe variabile ce pot afecta functionalitatea.
-
@Byte-ul: Cred ca @MrGrj se referea la folosirea clasei template vector care contine ca si membru dimensiunea.
4 hours ago, MrGrj said:1. Asta e C, nu C++.
2. Functia nu ar trebui sa primeasca size ca argument - daca am un vector care contine n elemente unde n e un numar foarte mare, ce fac ? Ma apuc si numar elementele de nebun ca sa stiu cat sa aloc pentru argument? Nu mai bine aloci dinamic un vector de marime n, unde n este dat de la tastatura ?
Anyway, ar trebui ca asta sa-si faca o idee chiar daca pe chat a supt-o si a vrut mura-n gura
@MrGrj: Cred ca esti confuz; in exemplul acela al lui @3t3r4n parametrul size din functia minim nu are ca scop decat comunicarea dimensiunii vectorului pasat ca adresa in variabila vector (care este un pointer int). Nu se aloca nimic. Vectorul e alocat in main ca variabila a[10].
Si ca sa determini minimul este necesar sa iterezi peste toate valorile vectorului, si pentru asta ai nevoie de dimensiunea vectorului altfel cum stii cand iesi din zona de memorie dedicata acestuia?
Singura situatie in care nu este neaparata transmiterea dimensiunii vectorului este la string-urile null terminated, unde iterezi pana gasesti caracterul null. Dar in rest, 0 este o valoare valida.
In cazul in care te gandeai sa determini marimea unui array cu tehnica
int somesizefn(int *v) { return sizeof(v)/sizeof(*v); } int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { int a[0xbf]; int q = somesizefn(a); return 0; }
nu cred ca ar fi mers.
Cum am spus mai sus, mai era varianta container-ului vector, caz in care daca tot folosesti C++ functia ar fi putut aratat asa:
// varianta cu index template <typename _T> _T minim(std::vector<_T>& v) { _T min = v[0]; for(std::vector<_T>::size_type idx = 1; idx < v.size(); ++idx) if(v[idx] < min) // aici te rogi ca _T sa aiba implementat operatorul "<" min = v[idx]; return min; } // varianta cu iteratori template <typename _T> _T minim(std::vector<_T>& v) { std::vector<_T>::const_iterator it = v.cbegin(); _T min = *it; for(it = v.cbegin() + 1; it != v.cend(); ++it) if(*it < min) min = *it; return min; }
Sau folosesti direct
*std::min_element(std::begin(a), std::end(a));
Dar avand in vedere ca este o tema de liceu, zic ca era cam mult de procesat.
Imi cer scuze fata de cei pe care i-am deranjat inutil mentionandu-i cu @; m-a cam luat valul.
-
E adevarat sau e o gluma. Ca daca e o gluma/pacaleala e buna, ca am muscat momeala
-
Macar de ar preda o lectie de baza: "Nu deschideti orice prostie care v-o recomanda cineva".
-
1
-
-
Deci e un tv tunner analog. Acum, intrebarea este, pe televizor prinzi canale analog? Eu am abonament de tot de la RDS-RCS si am semnal tv si digital si analog (nu mai stiu frecventele pe de rost). Dar nu sunt sigur ca e obligatoriu sa primesti si semnal digital si analog.
-
Ma scuzi acum, da' nu crezi ca era indicat sa mentionezi pe undeva tipul (firma + model) de tv tunner? Si ce tip de abonament RCS-RDS ai? Intreb deoarece sunt multe motive pentru care ar putea sa nu functioneze, de la un cablu prost la un defect fizic la incompatibilitate de semnal.
-
Is it just me or is this kind of bad.
-
@hades imi cer scuze daca te-am jignit; probabil ca nu am inteles eu corect la ce te-ai referit; mi s-a parut ca ai zis ca esti dezamagit ca a fost atat de pasnic protestul.
-
25 minutes ago, hades said:
30k oameni la Cluj.
O mana de jandarmi.
Atat de pasnic protest n-am mai vazut. Mai era putin si ne sarutam. Putin dezamagit.
Muie Romania.
Nu inteleg... Voiai sa iasa Lokal Combat?
-
Geez, need new, bigger tinfoil hat.
-
1
-
-
On 1/23/2017 at 8:17 PM, aelius said:
FreeBSD ar trebui sa mearga fara probleme. Am testat pe sparc64 si arm (nu mai stiu insa pe ce placa arm, era industriala).
Stiu ca pfSense merge pe unele platforme ARM (dupa cum a zis si @gaddafi Netgear are un dispozitiv ARM cu pfSense) dar din cate stiu eu nu totate arhitecturile ARM sunt inter-compatibile. Daca apuc sa cumpar un ODROID-XU4, am sa testez daca merge pfSense.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, aelius said:
Firewall (UTM) + Access point home sau small business. Ar fi foarte util daca ar avea doua porturi ethernet. Avand in vedere ca e ARM, ai bate la fund orice device de genul. Cu ceva carcase branduite, e o idee buna si pentru un business. Toti au nevoie la office de un firewall cu control acces, reguli de filtering pentru ad servere, anti spam, etc. Au suficiente resurse pentru a face inclusiv VPN server pentru a permite lucrul de la distanta pe statiile de lucru sau alte echipamente de la office (ex: active directory, server de email securizat, etc)
Daca are port USB3 poti pune adaptoare gigabit-usb. Cred ca merg macar 4 (presupunand ca e bus-ul non-shared). Problema e ca nu sunt multe kerneluri care merg pe ARM (aici ma refer la BSD in special pfSense).
-
On 1/16/2017 at 7:25 PM, DanYeL17 said:
Am cautat si am gasit ceva ..
Acest AP , dar nu stiu daca e destul de bun pentru distanta mea ..Păreri?
Sau daca cineva imi poate recomanda unul care sa fie 'compatibil' cu distanta mea , adica 300 de metrii ..
Si inca ceva ,ap urile de 5 mhz se pot conecta la wifi uri de 2.4 mhz sau trebuie sa aibă aceeasi frecventa ?
Cred ca te referi la GHz nu MHz. Si nu, un dispozitiv WiFi ce comunica pe banda de 5GHz nu poate comunica cu un dispozitiv ce foloseste banda de 2.4 GHz. Sunt dispozitive dual-band care au 2 transceiver-e. Dar daca e single-band, nu.
On 1/17/2017 at 1:10 PM, DanYeL17 said:Up
Un prieten a avut abonament la IDILIS , accesul la internet era datorat unui dispozitiv WiMax ( Acesta mai exact( OX350 WiMax) ) anyway, dupa abonament a ramas cu acel dispozitiv .
Acel dispozitiv nu are AP de la alt dispozitiv wi-fi , nu?(Wi Fi Cafenea ->OX350 WiMax -> Router wireless -> Alte dispozitive , dar nu cred că merge )
Il pot achiziționat de la el cu un pret destul de ok(foarte) si na , vreau sa stiu exact daca ar merge ideea ..
Daca nu , o sa raman la ideea de a cumpara AP
WiMax e cu totul alta mancare de peste. Ma indoiesc de posibilitatea de a conecta un dispozitiv WiMax la o retea WiFi.
-
2
-
-
Ar mai fi si http://www.hardkernel.com/main/products/prdt_info.php?g_code=G143452239825 pentru cei interesati.
-
2
-
-
3 hours ago, JohnM said:
ultima
Asta nu e raspuns. Fa si tu un efort si spune versiunea. Sau macar spune daca nu stii de unde aflii.
-
@Byte-ul tu ai trecut de 2 (Santa's free giveaway)?
-
Is this even remotely legal?
-
In opinia mea, cam depinde ce intelegi prin "aplicatii web": orice website dinamic, doar aplicatii SPA (Single Page Application - ex: Youtube, GMail), etc.
Eu nu sunt nici pe departe un mare cunoscator, dar in functie de raspunsul la propblema ridicata mai sus, aici ai include SQLi, XSS, LFI, Header Tampering...
-
Seems legit as far as I had time to fiddle with it.
Many thanks to @XRAHITEL.
-
1
-
Studiu Hashing Power
in Challenges (CTF)
Posted · Edited by u0m3
Am facut un mic demo cu hashcat ca sa vezi timpii de spargere pe un echipament relativ modest (o placa video AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series mai concret Asus EAH6870; ceea ce este modest in comparatie cu asta https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6225-post-33393.html#pid33393 )
********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:02:55+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c The wordlist or mask you are using is too small. Therefore, hashcat is unable to utilize the full parallelization power of your device(s). The cracking speed will drop. Workaround: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: 92cd8d45130b33c5461f6c4ebc8fa8f3 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:02:59 2017 (0 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:02:59 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1 [4] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 22534.7 kH/s (0.34ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 158184/456976 (34.62%) Rejected.........: 0/158184 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/17576 (0.00%) Candidates.#1....: lari -> jqgq HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 66c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:02:55 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:00 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:00+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:00+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c The wordlist or mask you are using is too small. Therefore, hashcat is unable to utilize the full parallelization power of your device(s). The cracking speed will drop. Workaround: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: c80a60e335f0451349bffe77d61f0b1b Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:06 2017 (0 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:06 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1 [5] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 120.5 MH/s (8.00ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 5483712/11881376 (46.15%) Rejected.........: 0/5483712 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/456976 (0.00%) Candidates.#1....: darin -> gqgqz HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 68c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:00 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:06 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:07+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:07+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: f70e537a7a8397d3b8e43e3026ea8824 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:11 2017 (0 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:11 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1 [6] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3060.2 MH/s (10.48ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 154140672/308915776 (49.90%) Rejected.........: 0/154140672 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/456976 (0.00%) Candidates.#1....: qlnder -> pweqlv HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 69c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:07 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:13 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:14+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:14+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Early-Skip * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: md5(md5($pass)) Hash.Target......: 6cbf7131b2b73859ecb7925b64d8b9e6 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:18 2017 (1 sec) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:19 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1 [6] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 629.2 MH/s (8.51ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 291393856/308915776 (94.33%) Rejected.........: 0/291393856 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 372736/456976 (81.57%) Candidates.#1....: ssnoux -> xhqfqg HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 70c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:14 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:20 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:20+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:20+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c The wordlist or mask you are using is too small. Therefore, hashcat is unable to utilize the full parallelization power of your device(s). The cracking speed will drop. Workaround: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: 85b0fc46a8eee36b530fbccfe1676891 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:24 2017 (0 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:24 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?d [6] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2788.8 MH/s (5.42ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 19685120/118813760 (16.57%) Rejected.........: 0/19685120 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/175760 (0.00%) Candidates.#1....: sande1 -> tiqfq8 HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 70c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:20 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:26 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:26+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:26+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: 31ec1bc10fee2c86270b3bf547c0d416 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:30 2017 (1 sec) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:31 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 [7] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3176.5 MH/s (8.36ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 1085263872/8031810176 (13.51%) Rejected.........: 0/1085263872 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/456976 (0.00%) Candidates.#1....: oesanan -> jetcdxw HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 72c Fan: 33% Util: 0% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:26 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:33 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:33+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:33+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force * Raw-Hash Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c Cracking performance lower than expected? Append -w 3 to the commandline! Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Cracked Hash.Type........: MD5 Hash.Target......: 44673da6f35229a3850fc08b26e77b09 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:37 2017 (9 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:03:46 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?d [8] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2727.1 MH/s (8.39ms) Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts Progress.........: 25047801856/80318101760 (31.19%) Rejected.........: 0/25047801856 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 1261568/4569760 (27.61%) Candidates.#1....: xpdzzpb0 -> hjrsjgn3 HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 75c Fan: 50% Util: 91% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:33 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:03:48 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:48+02 ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** >>>> 2017-03-21T01:03:48+02 hashcat (v3.40) starting... * Device #2: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ================================================ * Device #1: Barts, 512/1024 MB allocatable, 14MCU * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz, skipped Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Byte * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Early-Skip * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt * Brute-Force Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 75c Cracking performance lower than expected? Append -w 3 to the commandline! INFO: approaching final keyspace, workload adjusted Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Exhausted Hash.Type........: md5(md5($pass)) Hash.Target......: 562ac68d5bc31d3764e65c3aa9281241 Time.Started.....: Tue Mar 21 01:03:53 2017 (16 mins, 51 secs) Time.Estimated...: Tue Mar 21 01:20:44 2017 (0 secs) Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?d?d [9] Input.Charset....: -1 ?l, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.Dev.#1.....: 751.5 MH/s (6.19ms) Recovered........: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.........: 803181017600/803181017600 (100.00%) Rejected.........: 0/803181017600 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 45697600/45697600 (100.00%) Candidates.#1....: yqgygqk64 -> xqgqzqg93 HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 75c Fan: 83% Util: 88% Core: 915MHz Mem:1050MHz Lanes:16 Started: Tue Mar 21 01:03:48 2017 Stopped: Tue Mar 21 01:20:46 2017 >>>> 2017-03-21T01:20:46+02 **********************************************************************Acesta este scriptul PowerShell folosit pentru a genera testele:
$hashes = @( [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "92cd8d45130b33c5461f6c4ebc8fa8f3"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 4; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "c80a60e335f0451349bffe77d61f0b1b"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 5; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "f70e537a7a8397d3b8e43e3026ea8824"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 6; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "6cbf7131b2b73859ecb7925b64d8b9e6"; chrs = "?l"; type = 2600; ksln = "?1" * 6; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "85b0fc46a8eee36b530fbccfe1676891"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 5 + "?d"; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "31ec1bc10fee2c86270b3bf547c0d416"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 7; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "44673da6f35229a3850fc08b26e77b09"; chrs = "?l"; type = 0; ksln = "?1" * 7 + "?d"; }; [pscustomobject] @{ hash = "562ac68d5bc31d3764e65c3aa9281241"; chrs = "?l"; type = 2600; ksln = "?1" * 7 + "?d?d"; }; ); foreach($hashobj in $hashes) { Write-Output $("*" * 70); Get-Date -UFormat ">>>> %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%Z" ; .\hashcat64.exe -o hashes-yoyois.txt --outfile-format=15 -a 3 -m $hashobj.type -1 $hashobj.chrs $hashobj.hash $hashobj.ksln Get-Date -UFormat ">>>> %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%Z" ; Write-Output $("*" * 70); }Si acesta este output-ul din hashes-yoyois.txt
Formatul este hash[:salt]:plain:hex_plain:crack_pos
Ultimul hash nu a fost spart probabil pentru ca nu e keyspace-ul sau hash-type-ul corect.