demon_zone

ideile sunt ale tale ( ordinea obiectelor luate de pe net ), in rest ce? background?

vazand ca mica voastra cearta asupra unor cacaturi de simboluri s-a ajuns in alta parte, va recomand serialul Pillars of the earth

The phone features a superAMOLED screen Google has made its second bid for a slice of the mobile phone market, with the launch of its Nexus S phone. Phone promise The phone also has a greater emphasis on voice control. "In the US, one in four searches done on Android devices is done with voice," said Mr Burke. Nexus S The phone features a superAMOLED screen The phone comes with existing software that allows people to control navigation on the phone with their voice as well as conduct searches. A new set of commands also allows people to send text messages, e-mails and set alarms on their phone, amongst other things. These will initially only be available in the US, whilst the firm build the voice models needed for its software to cope with other regional accents. Many more at: BBC News - Google launches Nexus S phone in UK and US

sweet shit if his arrest wasn't a plan, then he is just a phony after all

respect Mosad it's not full chill out music, but this genre is not for jumping like an? idiot, this music is for the wide brained that can enjoy anytime a great tune that gets you chilled out. of course, gusturile nu se discuta share me some link mosad

"Prezervativele Steaua. Nu o sa marchezi nici o data! "

me? why not? ?

YouTube - In puii mei - sâmbata 27 noiembrie 2010 - Telecomandatii merg la restaurant (Dorel si Mirel)

e mult de codat si incep sa fiu de acord cu scripturile

People have to know ! WikiLeaks Strikes Back and Moves to Switzerland - TIME NewsFeed

me me. I'm curious about everything, but in principal about net, psd, audio and maybe some action scripts. Desigur, ai respectul meu Sanatate la neamuri. //Yes. Now i see that the account doesn't work. Idiot kids after all . . . Send it by PM. In this way you can track the bastard.

As U.S. officials struggle to control damage from the secret cables exposed by Wikileaks, Russia is planning to block a similar dump about the Kremlin. (AP Photos) As U.S. officials struggle to control damage from the secret cables, Russia is planning to block a similar dump about the Kremlin. And they will be ruthless, Philip Shenon reports. American intelligence and law-enforcement agencies, outraged by their inability to stop WikiLeaks and its release this week of hundreds of thousands of sensitive U.S. diplomatic cables, are convinced that the whistleblowing website is about to come up against an adversary that will stop at nothing to shut it down: the Russian government. More: Moscow's Bid to Blow Up WikiLeaks: Russians Play by Different Rules - The Daily Beast Source: The Daily Beast

________ ?(9*?4)-2=4 ______ ?(9*2)-2=4 ____ ?18-2=4 __ ?16=4 4=4

si tot aici US Tries to Contain Damage From Leaked Documents - ABC News

pls, don't let be there a war

cam asta-i. E cam vremea sa trece la alte stagii.... Din cate stiu eu, si cele 2 razboaie mondiale tot in urma sfarsirii unei crize economice au pornit. Inca ceva, e doar parerea mea, dar cred ca lumea se cam afla in impas. E vremea sa se evolueze. Doar stiti ce inflorire, in tot felul de domenii (in special tehnologic si genetic), a cunoscut lumea in urma celor 2 razboaie mondiale. Un asemenea razboi ar putea sa duca lumea si la distrugere dar si la o evolutie foarte rapida in tot felul de domenii. Well, we will see. I just hope, they will pick the way of peace

Exemplu, legi de compozitie: M=(1,?) x*y=2xy-2x-2y+3 1. Demonstrati ca legea este asociativa: (G1) G1: (x*y)*z=x*(y*z) 2. Demonstrati ca legea are element neutru: (G2) G2: e*x=x*e=x e = element neutru 3. Demonstrati ca legea are elemente simetrizabile: (G3) G3: x'*x=e x' = inversul lui x 4. Demonstrati ca legea este comutativa: (G4) G4: x*y=y*x Rezolvare: 1. G1: (x*y)*z=x*(y*z) notam x*y cu A. Si inlocuim ca in x*y=2xy-2x-2y+3. Uite: A*z=2Az-2A-2z+3 A era x*y, adica A=x*y=2xy-2x-2y+3, si pe A il inlocuim cu cat e egal x*y, asa: A*z=2(2xy-2x-2y+3)z-2(2xy-2x-2y+3)-2z+3 A*z=4xyz-4xz-4yz+6z-4xy+4x+4y-6-2z+3 A*z=4xyz-4xy-4yz-4xz+4x+4y+4z-3 Asa facem si cu x*(y*z) notam y*z cu B. Si inlocuim ca in x*y=2yz-2y-2z+3 x*B=2xB-2x-2B+3 B era y*z, adica B=y*z=2yz-2y-2z+3, si pe B il inlocuim cu cat e egal y*z, asa: x*B=2x (2yz-2y-2z+3)-2x-2(2yz-2y-2z+3)+3 x*B=4xyz-4xy-4xz+6x-2x-4yz+4y+4z-6+3 x*B=4xyz-4xy-4xz-4yz+4x+4y+4z-3 A*z=x*B ? Da x*(y*z)=(x*y)*z ? Da Deci rezulta ca legea este asociativa. 2. G2: e*x=x*e=x x*e=x Nu facem altceva decat sa inlocuim pe e cu y in legea data: x*e=2xe-2x-2e+3 cum x*e=x, avem: 2xe-2x-2e+3=x *intodeauna, trebuie aflat doar ce se afla dupa exista, adica e. Si nu x-ul! Multi fac greseala asta. 2xe-2e=x-3+2x Dam factor comun pe e: e(2x-2)=3x-3 Dam facut comun pe 2 din prima ecuatie si pe x din a 2-a: 2e(x-1)=3(x-1) si avem: e=3/2 Element neutru. 3. G3: x'*x=e La fel. Inlocuim cu x' in legea intitiala: x'*x=2x'x-2x'-2x+3 Si cum x'*x=e, unde e=3/2, avem: 2x'x-2x'-2x+3=3/2 La fel. Se afla doar ce se afla dupa exista. In cazul asta, x' . 2x'x-2x'=3/2-3+2x x'(2x-2)=(3-6+4x)/2 Scoatem factor comun pe 2 din prima ecuatie: 2x'(x-1)=(4x-3)/2 4x'(x-1)=4x-3 x'=(4x-3)/4(x-1) Ce face asta? Calculeaza elementu inversu pentru un numar din legea asta: 6'=21/20. Asta e inversul lui 6. 4. G4: x*y=y*x x*y=2xy-2x-2y+3 y*x=2yx-2y-2x+3 2xy-2x-2y+3=2yx-2y-2x+3 2xy-2x-2y=2yx-2y-2x 2xy-2(x+y)=2yx-2(y+x) Lege comutativa, deoarece inmultirea si adunarea sunt comutative. Source: my notebook. Next time, mai bine scanez.. pfff

words game love it

my opinion... usefull

sa-mi iau tir sau locomotiva?

eh, prostii... Si, totusi, ciudat. Un coleg ma tot batea cu data asta de 2 saptamani. Tot imi zicea ca de pe 8 noiembrie vor fi nu stiu ce scandaluri care vor duce la al3lea razboi mondial. Imi place sa combat teorii din astea, dar i'm not in the mood now... Totusi, nu cred pana nu vad. I am one of those Toma

cam proasta miscarea asta.

LONDON – Britain's spy agency chief stepped out of the shadows with an unprecedented public address, defending the need for secrecy to counter growing terror threats such as Iran's nuclear proliferation. MI6 chief John Sawers said Thursday even though Cold War-era secrecy has been lifted and intelligence agencies were working to become more accessible, keeping intelligence material secret was vital to protect people against terror attacks. "Secrecy is not a dirty word. Secrecy is not there as a cover-up," Sawers told a select group of journalists in London. "Without secrecy there would be no intelligence services, or indeed other national assets like our special forces. Our nation would be more exposed as a result." The question of secrecy has dominated world news in the last week, after the whistleblowing group WikiLeaks published nearly 400,000 U.S. intelligence logs detailing daily carnage in Iraq since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion. In July, the same group published 77,000 secret U.S. documents on the war in Afghanistan. Some of the leaked documents show that coalition forces handed over terror suspects to Iraqi security services even after abuse was suspected, or continued with interrogations despite visible injuries to suspects. There has been no clear mention of MI6 involvement in the logs, however. Sawers' speech also comes as two government inquiries probe whether MI6 and other agencies were complicit in the abuse of terror suspects — allegations that Sawers denied Thursday, adding that MI6 agents are obligated by law to stop and avoid torture. "And we do _even though that allows terrorist activity to go ahead," he said, adding that although his agency hasn't been specifically accused of torture it has been accused of "being too close to it." Sawers — also known by the codename "C" as all MI6 directors have been known since the first chief Mansfield Cumming — said progress had been made in Afghanistan and Pakistan, but new terror threats were growing in Yemen, Somalia and North Africa. The new threats come amid severe budget cuts ahead. "We get inside terrorist organizations to see where the next threats are coming from," he said. "What we do is not seen." He said while a "typical" terror attack would not bring down Britain, the dangers of nuclear proliferation — as well as chemical and biological weapons — had the potential to alter the political balance of power in the region. "The revelations around Iran's secret enrichment site at Qom were an intelligence success," he said. "They led to diplomatic pressure on Iran intensifying, with tougher U.N. and EU sanctions which are beginning to bite. The Iranian regime must think hard about where its best interests lie." But using intelligence poses anguished choices for agents — especially when faced with the possibility that intelligence could be tainted by abuse or torture. "Suppose we received credible intelligence that might save lives, here or abroad. We have a professional and moral duty to act on it," he said. "We also have a duty to do what we can to ensure that a partner service will respect human rights. That is not always straightforward. If we hold back, and don't pass that intelligence, out of concern that a suspect terrorist may be badly treated, innocent lives may be lost that we could have saved," he said. "Sometimes there is no clear way forward." In a court case that drove a wedge between U.S. and British intelligence, British High Court judges last year ordered the government to release secret U.S. intelligence exchanges on the treatment of former Guantanamo Bay detainee Binyam Mohamed, who claimed British authorities knew he was beaten and had his genitals sliced with a scalpel while being interrogated in Morocco. Sawers said the release of such information risked intelligence sharing and undermined the "Control Principle," a rule in the intelligence community that says the agency that gets the information first has the power to decide how the information is used. "So if the control principle is not respected, the intelligence sharing dries up," he said. The U.S. and Britain have often taken different approaches to terror threats, most recently seen during a European terror plot that was unveiled last month and is still considered active. While the United States issued a travel advisory warning citizens to be aware of potential threats in Europe, British officials downplayed the specifics of the plot. There was also a striking difference during the trans-Atlantic bombing plot in 2006, where militants tried to down several airliners with explosives contained in soft drink bottles. Prosecutors said American officials wanted to crack the plot and round up the suspects quickly whereas British officials wanted to wait and gather more information. MI6, known as the cloak-and-dagger employer of the fictional James Bond, has tried to become less secretive. It has started posting recruitment ads in Britain's media, hired press officers, and last month released its first-ever official history. The CIA took a similar path years ago. Sawers has already revealed more than any previous MI6 chief. Shortly after his appointment was announced last year, a newspaper ran some of the spy's holiday snapshots, taken from his wife's Facebook page. The images showed Sawers posing with his children, wearing a Santa hat and playing Frisbee on a beach. The Facebook pictures and other personal details were removed after the newspaper told the government about them. Some politicians called the details a security lapse. Sawers has a long history in policymaking, having served as Britain's U.N. ambassador and the U.K.'s special representative in Iraq during the 2003 invasion. He had also been involved in negotiations over Iran's nuclear program while serving as the political director of the Foreign Office between 2003 and 2007. Sawers' speech comes at a time when Britain's three major intelligence agencies collectively face a 7.5 percent cut over the next five years. Insisting that intelligence was more important now than ever, Sawers said MI6 would be working closely with Britain's domestic spy agency, MI5, and its eavesdropping agency, GCHQ, on budget issues. "Yes, the intelligence services have to make savings too," he said. source: UK spy chief defends secrecy in 1st public speech - Yahoo! News By PAISLEY DODDS, Associated Press Ce sa zic, ori stie sa minta bine, ori chiar asa o fi. Dupa ce am citit, ma intrebam: "Oare ce as face daca ar exploda o bomba biologica prin zona?" Raspunsul: "Ma doare-n pix. Ce o fi, o fi."

paranoici mai sunteti. dar sa stiti ca nu e rea idee. Pici un site > faci scam > zici la un prost ca aia e noua adresa pana revin aia > pac pac, gata treaba