wildchild

Let me remind you who started using abusive words and direct attacks. I would've gladly warned myself if I suddenly started for no reason to call people idiots when I find something that bugs me and does not share my thoughts. I wasn't interested in an answer, I only wanted to see how people are able to reason with some very uncertain dataset given in a problem(as often happens to be in real life). By the way, "dork" is way softer than "idiot". Now play it safe, stop insulting people which don't share the same opinion as you do.

And you got yourself with two warnings for not being so brilliant since I reminded you how we do not tolerate bad language in here. According to this system, the third one will be a temporary ban. edit: if that's your point on this matter, fine, I don't care if anyone agrees with my opinion, but that doesn't give you any right to insult people

Ieei! Azi facem petard? serverele! La mul?i ani nou?!

Don't care, I posted this because I wanted to see how people would judge the problem and how they analyze it. It wasn't ment for insulting people.

First of all, I did not claim it was made by me, I just wanted to make everybody think because everyone likes a challenge, no matter how tricky the answer is or is not. A fair person would put it's mind at work, wouldn't search for the answer straght on the interweb. Secondly, we do not tolerate or endorse bad language in here. It's a rule, you either stick to it or you're out. Your next insult will get you a warning, no matter whom you're insulting. And no thanks, I am not gonna post a problem more advanced jusr for you because dorks like you will search the really next second for a solving on the internet.

Ban permanent!

Tu chiar îl copiezi pe TinKode!

I feel sorry for you if you tend to seek for an answer on Google before doing a brainstorm. You should do that more often, in order to keep your brain sharp.

Dac? alegi un r?spuns aleatoriu la aceast? întrebare, care este ?ansa s? nimere?ti r?spunsul corect? A) 25% 50% C) 60% D) 25% Cu argumente v? rog, vreau s? v? v?d cum judeca?i.

Egocentrismul ?i ideea de "eu sunt cel mai ba?tan, ca mine nu-i nimeni" a adus ?ara în halul de acuma pe plan fizic ?i mental. Nu exist? unitate între oameni, exist? în schimb miserupism. De ce s? colaborez cu vecinul când fac eu singur treaba ca s? culeg eu laurii? Ideile de genul ?i preconcep?iile sunt adânc înradacinate ?i cu mare greutate pot fi stârpite. Nu conteaz? cât de r?u o duc, m?car s? moar? capra vecinului. Vrei schimbare, începi cu tine. Apoi încerci s? le explici celor din jur c? exist? ?i o alta cale, ?i func?ioneaz?. Lucrurile nu se vor îndrepta decât dac? o idee prinde contur, ?i toat? lumea face efortul de a contribui, nu de a se complace cu situa?ia, s? a?tepte dup? ceilal?i. Am f?cut o paralel? între ce exist? la noi în societate ?i pe forum. Deduce?i voi restul.

Pies? punk/whatever pe fundal ?i Salam pe stick. Mai epic de atât nu se poate.

La mul?i ani ?i felicit?ri pentru pas! S? ?tii c? RST-ul cu bune cu rele a format multe min?i, a scos tic-uri din oameni ?i le-a oferit o alt? perspectiv?. În timp se amortizeaz?, ?i nu e atât de inutil cum ar crede unii.

În cazul ?sta le doresc celor de la Yahoo s? ajung? ca ?i altavista.

Eu m-am lecuit cu românii, nu mai postez decât pentru cei pe care îi cunosc personal ?i ?tiu c? ofer? condi?ii adev?rate de munc?.

Cine zice c? administratorul d? tot ce are mai bun în a securiza un sistem la o firm? care îl trateaz? ca pe un sclav ?i î?i bate joc de munca lui oferindu-i un salariu de mizerie? Think again!

Huh? Am ratat ceva? Ce-i cu mine ?i e nevoie?

LiveLeak.com - Russian Tampon Commercial

For years, Microsoft has refused to offer financial rewards to researchers who tell the company about security flaws in its software, even as Google GOOG +0.15% and Facebook FB +0.85% have ratcheted up their so-called “bug bounty” programs. Now the software giant has suddenly changed its mind–and it’s even offering even bigger bounties in some cases than those competitors. On Tuesday Microsoft announced that it’s now willing to pay up to $100,000 for information about security bugs that can be used to bypass the defenses of Windows, starting with the upcoming preview version of Windows 8.1 to be released later this month. For researchers who also detail new defensive techniques for preventing similar bugs from being exploited in the future, Microsoft will pitch in an extra $50,000 “Defense Bonus” per submission. Google Offers $3.14159 Million In Total Rewards For Chrome OS Hacking Contest Andy Greenberg Andy Greenberg Forbes Staff Shopping For Zero-Days: A Price List For Hackers' Secret Software Exploits Andy Greenberg Andy Greenberg Forbes Staff Meet The Hackers Who Sell Spies The Tools To Crack Your PC (And Get Paid Six-Figure Fees) Andy Greenberg Andy Greenberg Forbes Staff “These are super challenging to discover and they require a new technique,” says Mike Reavey, director of Microsoft’s Security Response Center. “So to get people thinking in this area really does require a top-dollar reward.” Aside from those $100,000 and $50,000 bounties, Microsoft will also pay up to $11,000 for exploits affecting the preview version of Internet Explorer 11, a strategy designed to fix the software’s bugs before it’s widely released to users. “[Most organization] don’t offer bounties for software in beta, so some researchers would hold onto vulnerabilities until the code is released to manufacturing,” reads a blog post about the bug bounty program from Microsoft’s senior security strategist Katie Moussouris. “Learning about these vulnerabilities earlier is always better for us and for our customers. Microsoft’s payouts compare to just $20,000 offered by Google for bugs in its Web applications, though the search firm did briefly offer $150,000 for a bug in its Chrome operating system in a competition in January and $60,000 for bugs in its Chrome browser the year before. Mozilla offers up to $3,000 for bugs in its software. Facebook pays a minimum of $500 but doesn’t specify its maximum reward. Since Bill Gates‘ Trustworthy Computing memo in 2002, Microsoft has created a reputation for working closely with the security research community, hiring hackers and hosting the Blue Hat security conferences in Redmond. At the Black Hat conference last year it awarded the first Blue Hat prize for researchers who develop defensive techniques against exploits, totally $260,000 in rewards. So why only start paying bounties for bugs in its software now? Microsoft’s Reavey says that the company has been receiving a growing stream of reports through third-party bug buying programs like the HP-owned Zero Day Initiative and Verisign’s iDefense, which pay up to $10,000 for bugs and report them the software’s vendor. It also saw the impact of events like the annual Pwn2Own competition, where hackers are sometimes paid six-figure rewards for developing advanced exploits against Microsoft products and then revealing their techniques. “We find out about [these advanced exploits] once a year through these events, or unfortunately, in the wild,” says Reavey. “We want o get them year round as early and often as possible.” Part of the incentive for Microsoft’s program may also be the growing bounty for exploit techniques among a different community: Government and black market buyers who plan to use them for espionage or for crime. According to interviews I conducted in March of last year, a working exploit affecting Windows could earn a hacker between $60,000 and $120,000 dollars from an intelligence or law enforcement agency, and one that achieves full compromise of a Windows computer through Internet Explorer could earn as much as $200,000. In her blog post, Moussouris alluded to those less-friendly bug-sellers, arguing that Microsoft’s program aims to give them an equally lucrative alternative, and that its “Defense Bonus” may also make their offensive hacking more difficult. “With the strategic bounty programs announced today and the industry collaboration program enhancements to come, Microsoft will simultaneously encourage those who want to work with us while increasing costs for those whose actions cannot be affected by bounties or other incentive programs.” Sursa: Microsoft Finally Offers To Pay Hackers For Security Bugs With $100,000 Bounty - Forbes

Din toat? discu?ia asta, eu zic c? cel mai bine e s? r?mâi transparent. S? nu sari gardul în niciuna dintre ograde, s? stai s? prive?ti cum vâneaz? pisica ?obolanii.

Nimeni nu te aga?? ?i te ia pe sus dac? descarci pornache toat? ziua. Sau iei un mp3. Sau filme de pe torrente pe care ulterior nu le ?ii la seed sau le pui pe DVD-uri s? le comercializezi. Nici m?car dac? dai cu Havij-ul sau scanezi un site nu e?ti pasibil de pedeaps? serioas?. Chiar ?i spammerii scap? ieftin. Problema-i unde ies bani din activit??ile ilegale.

Nu iau nimic, am vrut s? le fac un bine deorece m-au sunat s? m? întrebe dac? nu sunt interesat de job ?i am spus c? pot s? recomand pe cineva dac? au nevoie. Nu mi-era greu s? postez, îns? acuma mi-am p?tat obrazul c? am recomandat ni?te persoane ?i aflu cu stupoare dup? c? le cere bani ca s? îi pun? fa?? în fa?? cu angajatorul. N-am nevoie de bani nef?cu?i cinstit.

UPDATE: am descoperit c? de fapt ei doar te pun în leg?tura cu firma ?i în cazul în care semnezi contractul, trebuie timp de 3 luni s? le dai 30% din cât câ?tigi în fiecare lun?. Dac? spuneau asta de la început, eu nu postam a?a ceva. Totu?i dac? e dispus careva s? fac? acest compromis, atunci s? trimit? PM s?-i trimit la ho?ii a?tia.

Toat? lumea are o facultate în CV în ziua de azi, îns? nu to?i ?tiu ce au de f?cut. Din punctul meu de vedere mie îmi convine, pentru c? ai 2 op?iuni: 1. E?ti excep?ional. 2. Nu trebuie s? fii briliant ca s? faci bani de pe cei care nu ?tiu ?i te pl?tesc pentru asta. Fiecare alege ce îi convine. În orice caz, cu cât mai mul?i absolven?i habarni?ti, cu atât mai bine pentru cei ce au avut bun?voin?a s? pun? mâinile pe tutoriale în afara cursurilor.

Hehe, oldies but goodies!

S? fii sigur de asta. Oricând! La fel e ?i cu studen?ii angaja?i de o perioad? de timp, vin ?i î?i explic? ei ?ie cum se face un lucru, nu cum scrie în c?r?i.