Graphik Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Neatza all. Am urmarit emisiunea din clipul postat si am o curiozitate.Voi cate core uri aveti la pc ul/pc urile pe care le detineti ? Personal am un laptop cu un single core la 3 ghz si un desktop cu un C2D E4400 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d3vtn Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 dual core intel 2.13 GHz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo20063 Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 i7 quad 2,3 pe laptop si 1 core 3,2 athlon pe pc(old shit but working great with xubuntu) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shinny Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 amd fx 6300 6 nuclee la 3.5 ghz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHats Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 I7, 3.6 ghz. Ivy bridge last generation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mariusdmm Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Intel E6500 @ 2.93GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.9GHz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalashnikov. Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Intel Core 2 Quad Processors Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daNNy.bv Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Intel i7 3630QM 2,4Ghz -> TurboBoost la 3,4Ghz - QuadCore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceveve Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 (edited) Intel "Core 2 Duo" 2.8 GHz 45 nm "Penryn" (T9600) Edited March 19, 2014 by aceveve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VladX Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Amd athlon II x4 - 3.3 ghz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendKiller Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 i5 Haswell de 2.7 cu turbo boost in 3.2Ghz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roby4kill Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 i5-3450 Quad-Core @ 3.10GHz (4 CPUs), ~3.1GHZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just-for-funn Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 E bine, sau rau? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleah Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Intel Q6600 2.4Ghz 4 cores. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pyth0n3 Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 (edited) @ Graphik este interesanta statistica ta, ceea ce ar fi de adaugat este beneficiul acestor resurse.Fiecare din voi specifica resursele pe care le are insa important ar fi sa cunoastem beneficiulAs putea formula urmatoarea intrebareCu ce credeti ca va avantajeaza un Octa Core in confrunt cu un Quad Core cand vine vorba de un computer si Cu ce credeti ca va avantajeaza un Octa Core in confrunt cu un Quad Core cand vine vorba de un telefon?As vrea sa stiu din experienta voastra care este diferenta in practica.Nu de alta dar traim intro era tehnologica in care ni se pun la dispozitie cat mai multe resurse.Ne trebuie intradevar?Le folosim?E util sa schimbam un telefon Dual Core pe unul Quad Core? Si de ce?Care este avantajul in practica pentru aceste alegeri pe care le facem?E un trend de a schimba sau chiar folosim aceste resurse?Si daca da le folosim in ce mod?Cu ce schimba navigarea pe internet pe un telefon Dual Core in confrunt cu unul Quad Core?Vreau date precise de Benchmarking. Edited March 19, 2014 by pyth0n3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CristianRoflmao Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Pe un laptop am i7 quad core 2.0 ghz sandy bridge,pe alt laptop am i7 quad core sandy bridge 2.2 ghz si pe pc cred ca am un dual core de 1.8 ghz sau sau 2 ghz nu stiu exact Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H3xoR Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 i3 3120m - 2.5GHz dual core pe laptop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LLegoLLaS Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 (edited) Mai indoiesc ca sunt mai multi cu hexacore decat quadcore,asa cum zice pollu' Voi ati adunat si nucleele de pe telefon?ON: Quadcore + Quadcore (pc+spartfon)Offtopic:How many cores does it take to be Hard? Edited March 19, 2014 by LLegoLLaS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdort79 Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 e8400 c2d 3.0ghz 6mb cache. o.c 3.7ghz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorila Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 core=nucleu,nu cate core uri. Invatati in pusca mea sa scrieti romaneste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silviu Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 (edited) Pe laptop Intel® Core™ i7-3612QM Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.10 GHz) BGA - Quad Core si pe telefon APQ8060pro Quad Core. Edited March 19, 2014 by Silviu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.O.C Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Daca nu ai pus in poll si 'Procesor cu lampa' ca si la televizoarele vechi nu votez. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fedorffixxzz Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 (edited) [...]As vrea sa stiu din experienta voastra care este diferenta in practica.Nu de alta dar traim intro era tehnologica in care ni se pun la dispozitie cat mai multe resurse.Ne trebuie intradevar?Le folosim?[...]Vreau date precise de Benchmarking.incerc sa-ti raspund eua) cpu-ul in mare parte sta in idle, insa lumea nu vede asta in ziua de azi gaming inseamna gpu power, deci cpu-ul este doar pentru o.s. sa faca heavy lifting si sa lase gpu pt. gaming (sau hash rainbow table attacking hehe)c) de fapt nu prea conteaza cate core-uri daca ai banda micasunt multe altele de luat in calcul (de exemplu metoda de calcul al cache-ului, sunt 3 tipuri pe procesoarele intel: unul este sa foloseasca linii intregi -cache lines-, altul este sa foloseasca una, iar un altul cel mai folosit este sa sacrifice intre aceste doua si sa comunice intre toate straturile de cache: L1, L2(,L3 pt. unii)). problema este ca in general (ca si Linux ca exemplu) se incearca sa se acopere standardizare si interoperabilitate si compatibilitate. asta inseamna sa sacrifici din cpu, insa vrei asta.ce nu vrei insa, este design gresit care nu face consum de resurse corect, iar in ultima vreme se tinde catre design foarte bun in aplicatii mari unde se incearca sa se stoarca de resurse pc-ul cat se poate de mult.pe Linux chiar este interesanta abordarea celor de la Firefox si Chrome (test: deschide n tab-uri si vezi resource consumption) unde chiar scurg ultima picatura de performanta fiindca stiu ca au kernel-ul bun pe dedesubt.alte aplicatii sunt cele de calcul masiv, cum sunt modele fizice, biologice si matematice unde este necesara computatie mare si putere mare de calcul.in principiu, pentru zi de zi, un cpu dual core este deja mai mult decat necesar, ce schimba acest lucru si cere, sunt interfetele foarte fancy (exemplu: Windows 7 aero & shit) care sacrifica performanta (a se citi: rupe cpu-ul prin kernel cu interrupt-uri pentru toate porcariile).asta este opinia mea; as fi tare curios sa iti aud parerea din UNIX Edited March 19, 2014 by fedorffixxzz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graphik Posted March 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 core=nucleu,nu cate core uri. Invatati in pusca mea sa scrieti romaneste.Domnu' Pruteanu, dumneavoastra sunteti ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERR0R404 Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 succes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
