sicilianul

studentule sa mor eu, debitezi prostii mai mari decat capu tau mare de elefant. Numai tampenii ai putut sa zici plus ca ai fost mereu pe langa. Saracul om avea si el o temperatura mai mare, si tu mai ai putin si ii recomanzi sa isi schimbe si femeia. Te rog eu abtinete sa mai zici ca altii nu au experienta in IT sau ce zici tu acolo, ca esti mai rau ca ei. Eu lucrez in service de asa ceva si te pun sa mananci tot prafu din calculatoare cand vin pline si clientul spune ca nu i-a facut nimic si nu se mai aprinde. Nu mai ma uit la alte dracii ce ai mai scris acolo plus ca scrii injositor, mai ai tasta " . " ? Sau sarcasmul din tine mai are baterii ? Si topic vechi de 2 luni...

Parerea mea strict si subiectiva: Incearca pe cat posibil sa fii matur si sa nu o dai in copilarisme. Punct!

Chiar acum am ceva probleme cu 8-ul, nu il inteleg la anumite "manifestari" si de ce ia anumite decizii total gresite. Stiu ca a fost rescris Kernelul, ca sau acoperit gauri din XP si 7 foarte bine, dar cum merge el si ruleaza lasa de dorit. Momentan nu prea vad sa fi facut vreun pas in fata cu acest windows. Si Nod32 chiar are niste conflicte grave la nivel de kernel cu windows-ul.

Lasa-ma sa te "pun putin la punct" cu ce vrei tu defapt de la noi, de la un laptop si in cele din urma de la un magazin. Nustiu ce intelegi prin modest, raportat la piata actuala de laptopuri si preturile acestora, unul modest ar fi undeva la 20-25 milioane, deci peste bugetul tau estimat. In momentul actual, nu exista niciun laptop pe stoc la vreun magazin, din cele enumerate de tine mai sus, care sa nu ruleze filmele FullHD cu cel putin 22fps, deci decent. Trecand mai departe la cerinta ta, sa iti ruleze FIFA 2013, pot sa iti zic ca orice laptop ruleaza acel joc, unele la 60fps-uri, altele la 5-6. Dar daca nu ai fost un copil (scuze ca am fost direct), ai fi cautat pe Google si ai fi vazut ca FIFA 2013 cere un dual core la 1,8Ghz,sau AMD echivalent, o placa video 6800xT de la nVidia sau echivalentul ei pentru AMD, aproximativ 2GB RAM si eventual un HDD care sa mai fie liber cu cel putin 8GB. Acum luand toate aceste specificatii cautam laptopul si gasim ceea ce iti las mai jos. Data viitoare poate nu mai esti asa lenes, ne surprinzi prin ceva frumos si util, iar eventual te lasi de jocuri, prostii etc. Variantele de la emag: Laptop / Notebook ieftine Pret Sub 1500 Capacitate memorie Pana in 4 GB Pret asc - eMAG.ro Variantele de la okazii: Laptopuri - Okazii.ro (pret intre Pret intre 1.000,00 si 1.500,00 RON,) Variantele de la pcgarage: Notebook / Laptop cu pret intre 800 si 1.500 RON - PC Garage

La mine merge bine cu nologin. Am cateva bune care merg rapid.

Au stricat numerele Anyway nu prea a mai ramas nimic de "ciugulit" acum doar sa ii stimuleze incearca.

Si uite asa incep copii ca de la 16 ani sa faca tranzactii pe 'net, si se intreaba parintii de ce le sunt saltate odraslele in noapte. Ma rog nu e problema mea, eu iti recomand ING.

La taxa noua, trebuie sa aduci dovada ca nu ai recuperat prin vreo metoda banii de pe taxa veche. Iar daca ai avut procese sau ai incercat sa iti scoti banii in trecut de pe taxa, la fel, nu te lasa.

Conturi free...mersi oricum.

@Bebe. Cand stii tu ultima oara ca a mers Tulcea ?

Cu noua taxa nici cei care ar trebui sa iti inmatriculeze masina si sa iti ia banii nu stiu procedurile. Cu bulgaria pica orice varianta, nu mai ai voie sa circuli asa cum era pana acum. Toate incercarile de a da statul in judecata nu mai functioneaza pentru ca au modificat paragrafe si legi care nu mai merg ocolite + avocatii nu se mai baga. Iar toate astea dupa ce femeia de la Tulcea a fost prinsa si inchisa. Dupa ce toti isi inmatriculau masinile pe bulgaria (iar acum le sunt confiscate la intrare). Dupa ce toti au incercat sa isi recupere taxa prin tribunale. Nerentabil sa stai 1-2 ani cu masina pe bara doar ca te plimba un avocat si un stat de cacat sa iti dea tie banii inapoi. Parerea mea personala e sa astepti ca se va schimba taxa actuala cu siguranta. E doar ceva de moment. In aceeasi situatie sunt si eu.

Cleverbot nu e niciun AI. E un site de chat. E gen omegle, chatroullette si asa mai departe. Va pune un alt indian random ales in functie de intrebarea voastra. Si cand se incurca va da un raspuns aiurea sau o intrebare sa schimbe subiectul. On:

O faci si putin pe santajistul si mai scoti iara niste bani...nu e rau!

Asa cum zice ringo95, nu vad de ce te-ar ajuta cineva... Hint: Ceea ce zici tu acolo se numeste log. Si exista deja!

Cablul care il alimenta si pana acum, cel de curent. E asemanator cu cel sata! (Doh!)

Watching GIFs In Reverse Makes Everything Better

Eu nustiu de unde isi iau sursa astia de Yoda de reusesc articole de tot jegul, scrise in graba si cu maxim 200 cuvinte unice. Harta internetului a mai fost facuta dar sub o alta forma, era postata si pe aici daca nu ma insel. Un singur "indian" nu putea sa duca un asa proiect. Iar utilizatorii de Linux sunt doar 3-4% maxim din cota de utilizatori on-line. Iar daca ar fi sa ii "arati" pe harta nu ar arata sub nicio forma cum au prezentat cei de la Yoda.

Abia acum incep sa inteleg. Din perspectiva unui hacker / cracker, mai bine te apuci si afli parola de la email-ul persoanei vizate, iar de acolo iti iei o sumedenie de conturi. Deci e clar ca problema nu e de la noi, in cea mai mare parte.

Odata cu ziua parolei scrisa de em a aparut in aceeasi sfera si un articol despre parole. Sursa articolului: Ars Technica Does your password go up to 11? Probably not. But one day it could. If you've ever been nagged about the weakness of your password while changing account credentials on Google, Facebook, or any number of other sites, you may have wondered: do these things actually make people choose stronger passcodes? A team of scientists has concluded that the meters do work—or at least they have the potential to do so, assuming they're set up correctly. The researchers—from the University of California at Berkeley, the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, and Microsoft—are among the first to test the effect that the ubiquitous password meters have on real users choosing passwords. They found that meters grading the strength of passwords had a measurable impact in helping users pick stronger passcodes that weren't used on other accounts. But the group also discovered these new, stronger passwords weren't any harder for users to remember than weaker ones. The scientists were quick to point out caveats to their findings. For one, the meters provided little benefit when users were choosing passwords while setting up a new account, as opposed to changing passwords for an already established account. And the meters provided no improvement for accounts people considered unimportant. "Within that context they're much more likely to just enter a password that they already used elsewhere because they either don't care about those accounts or that's just normally what they do when they enroll in a new account," Serge Egelman, a research scientist at UC Berkeley and the lead author of the paper, told Ars. "Whereas we show that in a different context—when changing passwords for high-value accounts—then the meters actually do have an observable effect on behavior in that people do choose stronger passwords. And ironically that's the context where we're least likely to see real meters in real life." The researchers' paper—titled Does My Password Go up to Eleven? The impact of Password Meters on Password Selection—is important because it provides useful guidance to both end users and the security professionals who work to protect them. While more and more sites now offer these meters, Egelman said a surprising number of online banking services and corporate intranets don't yet offer them. Remarkably, neither Microsoft Windows nor Apple's OS X for Macs uses meters for users who are choosing or changing account passwords. The findings come from an experiment in which affiliates of the University of British Columbia were brought to a laboratory and asked to test the usability of a portal that students, faculty, and staff use to access e-mail, view grades, and check out library books. As soon as they successfully logged into their account, they were presented with a notice requiring them to change their password. While the plaintext was never recorded, the laboratory computer did store a cryptographic hash of the passwords. It also measured other characteristics of both the old and new passwords, including the length and whether they used upper- and lower-case letters, numbers, and special characters. Some of the subjects were presented with one of two types of password meters that rated the strength of the new password, while a control group saw no meter at all. The password meters presented to the test subjects used "zero-order entropy," a technique many meters use to measure password strength. One set of "existing motivator" meters used the measures to rate passwords as "weak," "medium," or "strong." A second set of "peer-pressure motivator" meters used the same data to present the strength of the new password relative to all the users of the system. In turns out that the subjects who were presented with either type of meter picked significantly "stronger" passwords than those in the control group. The average zero-order entropy of passwords chosen with guidance from the existing motivator meter increased to 60.8 and the entropy of passwords chosen with the peer-pressure motivator grew to 64.9 bits. This means the total number of combinations required to brute-force crack the passwords would be 260.8 and 264.9 respectively. Subjects who saw no meter at all chose passwords that on average were 49.3 bits strong, about the same as the old passwords from all three groups. "Overall, we observed that both password meters yielded statistically significant differences when compared to the control condition," the researchers reported in the paper. (The findings were recently presented at the CM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems in Paris.) In addition to increasing entropy metrics, the researchers found other indications of improved strength. Passwords generated with the help of meters increased from a median of 9.0 to 10.0 characters, included more special characters, and contained more lower-case letters (from a median of 6.0 to 7.0). "Thus, the meters motivated participants to create longer passwords through the inclusion of symbols and additional lower-case letters," the researchers said. The subjects were invited back to the laboratory two weeks later and another encouraging finding came up. Those who had chosen stronger passwords with the help of the meter had no more trouble remembering their new passcodes than those who had chosen weaker passwords without using a meter. What's more, those with stronger passwords were no more likely to have reverted back to their old one than those who had chosen weaker passwords. Building a better mousetrap It's encouraging to know that password meters have a measurable effect on the passwords chosen by end users. But sadly there's no guarantee meters will actually help people choose passcodes that are more resistant to real-world cracking techniques. That's because the widely used zero-order entropy rating system is a poor metric for measuring the strength of passwords. The strength of the passcodes "Pa$$word1" and "$ecretPa$$word1" (minus the quotes) is 59.1bits and 98.5bits respectively. That's much higher than many passwords offer. What the scoring system fails to account for is that both passwords are so widely used that they're inevitably included in wordlists used in cracking attacks. These are among the first passwords to fall in typical cracking attacks. By contrast, the password "lkx8q2pe0" is considerably stronger because it would require time-consuming brute-force techniques to crack it, and yet it offers just 46.5 bits. (Bits are calculated by x * log_2(y), where x is the number of characters in a passcode and y is the number of available letters, numbers, or special characters). What this means is that password meters have the ability to help end users choose more crack-resistant passcodes only if the meters are set up correctly. As Ars documented last week, a password advice site from Intel can't be trusted to help users pick passcodes because the methodology it uses is hopelessly flawed. The password meters used in the study and offered on many sites suffer from the same type of weakness, but there's no reason they can't be drastically improved—for instance, by banning the one million most commonly used words. Egelman said there's no evidence to suggest improved meters wouldn't generate the same measurable effect in guiding people's choice of passwords. "They don't know what algorithm we're using to drive the meter," he said. "They just know that they do some behavior, they get some feedback, and they keep trying until [they get] feedback they're happy with. I suspect that if we changed what the feedback is based on we would still have the impact on them."

Daca poti updata intre timp screenshot-ul din primul post sa putem intelege si cei care prindem mai tarziu. Meanwhile: 1)It would take a desktop PC about A thousand years to crack your password 2)It would take a desktop PC about 52 seconds 3)It would take a desktop PC about 3 quadrillion years Eu am incadrat site-urile si programele (aici intra si sistemul de operare) in 3 categorii: 1)Site-uri de uz zilnic in care nu am ce pierde daca este compromis contul 2)Site-uri pe care fac cont doar de nevoie. Aici intra si varianta in care incerc userul si parola by default si poate merge. 3)Parola unde am mare nevoie de acel cont. Si combinatia este destul de buna + usor de retinut (aproape imposibil de uitat) + foarte sigura

Atunci faci ce ti-am zis in doar o zi!

Aceeasi intrebare si din partea mea. Parerea mea e sa fii mai linistit. Mergi si vezi usor unde sta, 2 zile il filezi. Cand il prinzi singurel te dai jos din masina sau tramvai. Mergi si vorbesti cu el. Ii spui din start ca nu ii faci nimic si doar vrei sa discuti cu el. Si ii explici frumos baiatului ca daca mai te deranjeaza odata ii rastorni taraba. Iar ca sa fie treaba buna ii zici sa treaca strada de fiecare data cand te vede si eventual sa iti stearga si pantofii. a.k.a. il faci sclav. P.S. La ce freza are el, tu ce natie de coafura ai frate de v-ati ciondanit ?

De ce nu zici vere ca inca mai esti bagat in ala... nu te mai chinui ca e doar un cont de YM amarat de copil obsedat de metin.

Frumusel. Cam de copii (a.k.a. MatrixXx) dar merge. Treaba cu realplayer care e ?

Ce a facut si nokia spre exemplu. Desii stiu ca e bugetul la mijloc care probabil nu le permite.