dicksi

Strongboi!Strongboi! he's the coi!he's the coi!

next carberp instalation step by step with pictures:))

Sorry, you have reached your monthly voucher redemption limit. Please try again later.

The silk road moderators / admins were arrested The resurrection of the popular Silk Road drug website known as “Silk Road 2.0? has been online for less than two months. But law enforcement already seems to be closing its net. Three alleged former Silk Road employees, including the two Silk Road 2.0 moderators, have now been indicted on drug, hacking, and money laundering charges. Another Day, another dark net shitstorm started today as some woman claiming to be the Girlfriend of a “Silk road Administrator / Mod” posted on reddit that her boyfriend just got arrested today: "Guys I was arrested yesterday and out on bond now. But something is fucked! I know I’m risking more warning you guys and my attorney doesn’t even want me on the internet but you guys need to know this. When I was in the interview room they showed me all sorts of shit that they should not know or have access to including conversations I’ve had with buyers and even [the Silk Road 2.0 administrator known as the Dread Pirate Roberts]. I don’t fucking understand.. and when I was in there I was at a loss for words. Something is definitely wrong and they have the ability to see things on here only mods or admins should like [bitcoin] transfers and a dispute I had." http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/12/20/at-least-two-moderators-of-the-silk-road-2-0-drug-site-forums-arrested/

ma mir ca nu am auzit inca de rapiri de persoane cu rascumparare in bitcoin

articolul trebuie sters,vand metoda pe hackforums,i'll be rich:P

bancore e inregistrat ca banca daneza iar tu ai atasat deja card de romania...trebuia cred remove la card de romania,close account,facut altul si apoi introdus cardul bancore

nigga you got slave melancholy?!

"IP67 water/dust resistance" deci aduci borcanul cu apa sa-l verifici:P

ai inteles o pula,traieste-ti viata omule,bea o bere cu prietenii,in orice tara vei da de aceleasi nemultumiri si oricum nu vei schimba nimic oricat te vei prinde de coaie si vei striga cat de patriot esti!nu se grabeste nimeni la demonstratii pentru ca oricine a fost la conducere a furat cat a putut,starea generala de depresie si ura s-a transformat acum intr-un somn al indiferentei.in parte toti suntem vinovati de ceea ce se intampla,capitalismul produce caini care se manaca intre ei,supravietuieste cine poate,asta e sistemul care l-am ales..e.o chestie globala,we are living zombies totusi un om inteligent se descurca in orice situatie,indiferent de saracia sau bogatia care a "mostenit-o" . nu mi-a fost atat de dor in strainatate de romania si nici "acasa" de locurile in care am calatorit,vodka&pussy it's everywhere si asta conteaza:))

https://www.mediafire.com/?pjp1exezq09y3m5 https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e4976771d40b99c53d6dfaf80037a81ae67ba84a9b4d8131a173059db199d22b/analysis/

in orice tara te-ai naste nu ai prea multe sanse sa schimbi ceva,intodeauna va domina banul pe cei din functii "importante" . viata ti-o faci singur,te nemultumeste ceva? esti oricand liber sa-ti schimbi tara,prea mult patriotism te limiteaza ca om

it's the only way,you got to lick my balls=))

To insist on Internet data storage within the country In view of its growing cyber security concerns, India has decided to challenge the U.S. government’s control over the Internet and ensure that the trio of the U.S., Russia and China does not ignore India’s concerns while developing an international regime for Internet governance. India will also push for storing all Internet data within the country, besides ensuring control and management of servers. “The control of Internet was in the hands of the U.S. government and the key levers relating to its management was dominated by its security agencies…Mere location of root servers in India would not serve any purpose unless we were also allowed a role in their control and management. We should insist that data of all domain names originating from India…should be stored in India. Similarly, all traffic originating/landing in India should be stored in India,” says an internal note prepared after the meeting of Sub-Committee on International Cooperation on Cyber Security under the National Security Council Secretariat (NSCS). Notably, the key function of domain name system (DNS) management today is in the hands of the U.S. National Telecommunication and Information Administration and the Department of Commerce. Though after persistently putting pressure on companies, India managed to get root servers installed in the country, it wants a say in management of these servers. India is also seeking a key role in policy making on Internet governance at the international level, said a senior government official engaged in India’s cyber security preparedness. “It was important that management and control of the DNS should be supervised by a ‘Board’ consisting of technical experts nominated by governments and India should be represented on this Board. We should seek a larger determinate role for the GAC [Government Advisory Committee] in ICANN [internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number] a U.S.-based non-profit organisation that coordinates global Internet systems, which we should be effectively represented,” the note adds. Significantly, under the ‘Affirmation of Commitments’ between the ICANN and the U.S. Department of Commerce, the ICANN committed that it would not shift outside of the U.S. without the concurrence of the U.S. government and the process of Internet management would be led by private sector. At the meeting, held last month and headed by Deputy National Security Advisor and NSCS Secretary Nehchal Sandhu, it was decided that the Ministry of External Affairs along with the Department of Electronic and Information Technology (DEITy) and the NSCS, will develop a position paper, highlighting India’s concerns regarding representation and management control in the Internet governance domain. India is also concerned about the proximity of the U.S., Russia and China while deciding on issue of Internet governance. “There was a possibility that the U.S., Russia and China may work out an arrangement that met their concerns and this arrangement was thereafter forced upon other countries. We need to guard against this possibility and ensure that India’s concerns were also accommodated in whatever international regime for Internet governance that ultimately emerged,” the note adds. Notably, today India has third largest Internet users in the world at over 15 crore, only after China (56 crore) and the U.S. (25 crore). Similarly, India has also decided to favour a pre-dominantly multilateral approach on issues related to Internet governance rather than multi-stakeholder approach which is mainly being advocated by the West. “India feels that the very term multi-stakeholder was something of a ‘misnomer’. A small unrepresentative group of certain individuals, supported by vested interests, appear to have arrogated themselves the right to present certain views in discussions relating to Internet governance. It was not clear as to who they represent and whether who they claimed to represent had in fact nominated them. These persons undermine the positions of the government and were really spokespersons of certain Western interests,” the note says. India to push for freeing Internet from U.S. control - The Hindu

atunci vorbeste cu femeia lui sa-l convinga : fifa=no pussy, no fifa=pussy

Facebook offshores HUGE WAD OF CASH to Caymans - via Ireland We don't want all this money we earn to be taxed ... bitch Facebook has reportedly swerved a huge corporation tax bill by paying its Ireland-based parent company - Facebook Holdings Limited - €1.75bn in “admin costs” for its intellectual property. According to the Financial Times (£), Facebook recently reported a pre-tax loss of €626,000 after it paid out those expenses. In 2012, Facebook Ireland Ltd had 382 staff on its books in Dublin, and reported a gross profit of €1.75bn and sales of €1.79bn for the year. The paper said that a number of the free content ad network's shareholders were Facebook subsidiaries based in the Caymans Islands; a well-known tax haven. The practice of avoiding tax in that way – known as Double Irish – is used by other internet giants such as Google, which shifts some of its money through a Bermuda shell company. But the method could soon be stamped out by bringing an end to "stateless companies" in Ireland, it's been reported. Facebook defended its actions by saying it "complies with all relevant corporate regulations including those related to filing company reports and taxation." Google, Amazon and Facebook have been among the big US outfits to come under fire from the UK Parliament, whose politicos have attacked the multinationals for creatively avoiding corporation tax bills. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/12/06/facebook_offshores_cash_in_cayman_islands_to_avoid_big_tax_bill/

free tinky!!!

se mai practica missed call scams ?

nu am fost banat pe nici un traker cu asta si merge pe orice versiune utorrent: ZzhuWjBJMmJ3eGZSZlczMUIrZTVFem4yQldDQkR6L0ZxK1FadjhoaHpndjRYOGM4MHJZTWF6bll5ZUJH

foobar2000 and flac all the way iar pt video: SVP provides GPU acceleration and it's possible to watch FullHD 1080p-video recalculated to 60Hz in real-time sau splash pro ex

Secret U.S. court approved wider NSA spying even after finding excesses (Reuters) - A secret U.S. intelligence court let the National Security Agency collect an expanded amount of data about Americans' email even after finding that the agency systematically exceeded the limits of a smaller program, newly released documents show. The judge on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court recounted a litany of problems with the first, smaller program, including the NSA collecting more categories of information than had been approved by the court and sharing data more widely within the electronic eavesdropping agency than had been authorized. At issue are emails among U.S. citizens that the NSA scooped up in its pursuit of foreign intelligence. Though historically focused overseas, the agency intensified its domestic operations after the September 11, 2001, attacks in hopes of finding people in the country working with terrorists or spies. The programs let the NSA search for Americans who had electronic contact with people who were in turn linked to people hostile to the United States. At times, however, analysts queried the database with names that had not been found to be terrorists or foreign agents, the judge found. The NSA was allowed to share criminal evidence with law enforcement agencies, but in other cases it was supposed to obscure email addresses to protect the identities of U.S. citizens because of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches. Instead, Judge John Bates wrote about the first bulk collection program, "NSA analysts made it a general practice to disseminate to other agencies intelligence reports containing U.S. person information," such as their email addresses. Bates' 117-page opinion was among nearly three dozen documents declassified and released on Monday by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in the wake of suits filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. SERIOUS NON-COMPLIANCE The order is heavily redacted, with entire pages and even the date of the ruling censored. Still, the remaining harsh criticism echoes that of a previously disclosed opinion faulting the NSA's conduct in scooping up email addresses and routing information. "We've now seen multiple FISA Court opinions documenting a pattern of serious non-compliance and misrepresentation on the part of the NSA," said Elizabeth Goitein of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University. "These opinions highlight the dangers of a surveillance system that relies so heavily on self-policing by the agencies that are collecting Americans' data. The new releases also confirm that the FISA court lacks the will to rein in the NSA," she said. In a statement accompanying Monday's release, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence wrote that the second program had been discontinued in 2011 after an "examination revealed that the program was no longer meeting the operational expectations that NSA had for it." The intelligence officials wrote in Monday's statement that the first program was abandoned after it brought problems to the attention of the court. Other mass collection programs continue, documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden show, and it is possible that the second program likewise was dropped under pressure from the court. The newly disclosed order also shows that the NSA tried to prolong its access to the fruits of the dropped program and was partially successful. Judge Bates agreed to let analysts search data that had been collected properly but not the extra material it shouldn't have collected in the first place. The judge said legislation "makes it a crime for any person, acting under color of law, intentionally to use or disclose information with knowledge or reason to know that the information was obtained through unauthorized electronic surveillance." Compared to the initial program, Bates said the second "encompasses a much larger volume of communications, without limiting the requested authorization to streams of data with a relatively big concentration of foreign power communications." But after accepting procedures to limit the spread of identifying information on Americans, he approved it anyway. Secret U.S. court approved wider NSA spying even after finding excesses | Reuters they don't give a shit!

in other news: bitcoin mtgoxUSD 500 se incearca un control "guvernamental" al bitcoin prin blacklist coins Mike Hearn, Foundation's Law & Policy Chair, is pushing blacklists right now daca se va intampla, undergroundul se va muta spre Zerocoin reduces proof size by 98%, plans to release as altcoin

faci parte dintr-o generatie care se maturizeaza fortat, incepi sa traiesti criza varstei a doua, solutia: fu?i, nu fu?i, vremea pulii trece

oare ce putea sa spuna avocata?!chiar daca pierdeti(si e sigur,putin probabil ca un judecator sa ia apararea unor pusti fara coaie) ea tot este platita de voi:)) avand in vedere ca partile inculptate au sigur familie si pot risca chiar pierderea serviciului iar voi niste mucosi fara demnitate si respect,meritati sa fiti batuti. partea comica e ca dupa proces ve-ti lua bataie din nou:)) dupa o luna,un an cat sa nu dea de banuit,va stiu adresele,cat e sa puna un tiganas care il au la mana sa va baga de data asta in spital,acum e prea tarziu ai intrat in hora joaca,poate in cel mai bun caz daca pierdeti si a primit jandarmul un blowjob in dimineata procesului,v-a spune da-i in plm sunt niste copii:D