Leaderboard

Programare in limbajul C/C++ pentru liceu Emanuela Cerchez, Marinel Serban este pentru incepatori Download link: https://www25.zippyshare.com/v/KxEH9wdy/file.html

- the important thing is the code work Bro .... - I am just want to publish something may be useful to someone - you do great thinks for us nytro..thanks

How Retailers Use Personalized Prices to Test What You’re Willing to Pay Rafi Mohammed October 20, 2017 https://hbr.org/2017/10/how-retailers-use-personalized-prices-to-test-what-youre-willing-to-pay

Cred ca avea codul printat si il copia.

The Free Software Foundation and it's sprout the GNU Project are a core element of the free and open source software movement. They led to a new era of software development where sharing and improving as a community is more valuable than selling proprietary software (maybe because we stopped selling software altogether and started selling services). But there is a key thing in the most popular free licence of the world, a key problem that let me question if this license is truly free, or if it brings a distorted concept of freedom. And it's a problems affecting both version 2.0 and 3.0 of the GNU Public License. Is a license that sets limits to developers really "free"? Software freedom as intended by Richard Stallman and the FSF is not real freedom, just like communism is not really about sharing and loving each other. Communism is more like being at the bottom of the pit, and forcing everyone to stay down there just because you don't wanna be left behind by those who manage to climb. Software freedom in the stallmanian way of thinking is not about being free, is about not doing anything on your own. No commercial software, no code that you keep for yourself, no way to use it in a manner that makes you keep it private. Which is good, right? Well, not really. Not at all. Free not to be free A key point of this whole text is about the definition of freedom. What follows is MY POINT OF VIEW and does not reflect any "official" definition of freedom. In my vision of software freedom, free software means that I'm allowed to use it in my daily work, to make use of libraries and programs inside my projects. I mean, that is the whole reason I do open source in the first place. When I started the PlugFace Framework I decided to release it under the MIT License because I thought that it could be useful to other people in need of using plugins inside their software. I thought of other developers in my same situation, in need of modularizing their monolitic application at work with a simple and robust solution. I don't care if you want to use it in proprietary software, on the contrary I would be flattered by this. GPL wouldn't allow that to happen. A PlugFace Framework released under GPL would have never been used in enterprise environment because it would require to the user to release their software under the same license. Even with LGPL, which allows software linking to proprietary software, would not have been ideal since any customization (i.e. proprietary security features to validate plugins?) could not have been kept private. So if I'm developing a library, why should I want to use a GPL-like license? Why should I choose a free license in order to limit other developers' freedom? But Matt, without a strong copyleft license $InsertNefariousSoftwareCompanyHere could steal your work and sell it with their name on it, and you wouldn't see a dime of it. I can hear you reply like that already. And my answer would be: THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I WANT. If you are reading this and you are a software company, please TAKE MY CHILD SOFTWARE AND DO WHAT YOU WISH WITH IT. If my goal was to make money I wouldn't be doing open source, I would try with something easier. Like forex trading, ice-cream making or underground drug dealing. Instead, I'm doing open source software because I want people to use it, to solve problems with it. I imagine professional software developers like myself being stuck with a problem, finding out my GitHub account and thinking "Well damn, this guy has made a library that exactly do what I need". And it would download it, and link it into his software and proceding working, and I would send him a spiritual "You're welcome buddy" through the Force. That's why, if you write software libraries, you should NEVER EVER USE GPL LICENSES. The best enterprise software are released under weak copyleft licenses, like Kubernetes, Docker, Google Guava, FreeBSD and many others. cLinux doesn't count. Linux is a final product, not a middleware. But still, remember that without weak licensing and with Linux as the only open source OS, products like the PlayStation 4 and the Nintendo Switch would be very very different. Choose another license, please There are many many great licenses out there that are truly free. They will make Stallman angry (and that's probably something that I would truly enjoy), but they will also make many fellow developers happy and thankful. My favourite ones are the the Apache License 2.0 and MIT License. I release all of my works under those two licenses (and also the MPL 2.0 for complete products, aka not libraries). If you want a complete list, check out this awesome site from GitHub and look for licenses that does not feature the Same license tag in the Conditions column. They are the weak-copyleft ones. Sursa: https://dev.to/matteojoliveau/gnu-public-license-is-all-but-free-and-you-should-never-use-it-3fk

If you insert your fist, up to your shoulder, into your mum’s foul pussy, you’ll find it there on the right hand side, next to her 6 abortions. Good luck!

http://www.oreilly.com/programming/free/

intrebarile din chestionar mi-au adus aminte de scena asta, avind in vedere componenta socioprofesionala a celor ce bintuim pe aici raspunsurile cit si modul euristic de alcatuire al chestionarului... mi-au confirmat ca... nu e chiar o parodie...

Ti-am dat un PM.

Salutare. Ma numesc Bogdan, am 17 ani si cunosc acest forum de cativa ani buni. Sunt pasionat de tot ceea ce tine de it, inclusiv programare, fapt pentru care am zis sa incep sa activez si aici.

Download

@dancezar daca il recuperezi sa il pui pe github.

A newly discovered unpatched attacking method that exploits a built-in feature of Microsoft Office is currently being used in various widespread malware attack campaigns. Last week we reported how hackers could leveraging an old Microsoft Office feature called Dynamic Data Exchange (DDE), to perform malicious code execution on the targeted device without requiring Macros enabled or memory corruption. DDE protocol is one of the several methods that Microsoft uses to allow two running applications to share the same data. The protocol is being used by thousands of apps, including MS Excel, MS Word, Quattro Pro, and Visual Basic for one-time data transfers and for continuous exchanges for sending updates to one another. The DDE exploitation technique displays no "security" warnings to victims, except asking them if they want to execute the application specified in the command—although this popup alert could also be eliminated "with proper syntax modification." Soon after the details of DDE attack technique went public, Cisco's Talos threat research group published a report about an attack campaign actively exploiting this attack technique in the wild to target several organisations with a fileless remote access trojan (RAT) called DNSMessenger. Necurs Botnet Using DDE Attack to Spread Locky Ransomware Now, hackers have been found using the Necurs Botnet—malware that currently controls over 6 million infected computers worldwide and sends millions of emails—to distribute Locky ransomware and TrickBot banking trojan using Word documents that leverage the newly discovered DDE attack technique, reported SANS ISC. Locky ransomware hackers previously relied on macros-based booby-trapped MS Office documents, but now they have updated the Nercus Botnet to deliver malware via the DDE exploit and gain an ability to take screenshots of the desktops of victims. Hancitor Malware Using DDE Attack Another separate malware spam campaign discovered by security researchers has also been found distributing Hancitor malware (also known as Chanitor and Tordal) using Microsoft Office DDE exploit. Hancitor is a downloader that installs malicious payloads like Banking Trojans, data theft malware and Ransomware on infected machines and is usually delivered as a macro-enabled MS Office document in phishing emails. How to Protect Yourself From Word DDE Attacks? Since DDE is a Microsoft's legitimate feature, most antivirus solutions do not flag any warning or block MS Office documents with DDE fields, neither the tech company has any plans of issuing a patch that would remove its functionality. So, you can protect yourself and your organisation from such attacks by disabling the "update automatic links at open" option in the MS Office programs. To do so, Open Word → Select File → Options → Advanced and scroll down to General and then uncheck "Update Automatic links at Open." However, the best way to protect yourself from such attacks is always to be suspicious of any uninvited document sent via an email and never click on links inside those documents unless adequately verifying the source. Via thehackernews.com

Si nu numai Word... Iar pentru cine e interesat de aceasta "functionalitate", aici este un articol care discuta DDEAUTO: https://www.endgame.com/blog/technical-blog/bug-feature-debate-back-yet-again-ddeauto-root-cause-analysis Update Metode de mitigare https://www.peerlyst.com/posts/no-macros-no-problem-how-microsoft-office-dde-attacks-work-and-how-to-block-them-barkly https://gist.github.com/wdormann/732bb88d9b5dd5a66c9f1e1498f31a1b Si inca un vector:

objection Runtime Mobile Exploration, powered by Frida. introduction objection is a runtime mobile exploration toolkit, powered by Frida. It was built with the aim of helping assess mobile applications and their security posture without the need for a jailbroken or rooted mobile device. The project's name quite literally explains the approach as well, whereby runtime specific objects are injected into a running process and executed using Frida. Note: This is not some form of jailbreak / root bypass. By using objection, you are still limited by all of the restrictions imposed by the applicable sandbox you are facing. features Supporting both iOS and Android and having new features and improvements added regularly as the tool is used in real world scenarios, the following is a short list of only a few key features: For all supported platforms, objection allows you to: Patch iOS and Android applications, embedding a Frida gadget that can be used with objection or just Frida itself. Interact with the filesystem, listing entries as well as upload & download files where permitted. Perform various memory related tasks, such as listing loaded modules and their respective exports. Attempt to bypass and simulate jailbroken or rooted environments. Discover loaded classes and list their respective methods. Perform common SSL pinning bypasses. Dynamically dump arguments from methods called as you use the target application. Interact with SQLite databases inline without the need to download the targeted database and use an external tool. Execute custom Frida scripts. iOS specific features in objection include the ability to: Dump the iOS keychain, and export it to a file. Dump data from common storage such as NSUserDefaults and the shared NSHTTPCookieStorage. Dump various formats of information in human readable forms. Bypass certain forms of TouchID restrictions. Watch for method executions by targeting all methods in a class, or just a single method. Monitor the iOS pasteboard. Dump encoded .plist files in a human readable format without relying on external parsers. Android specific features in objection include the ability to: List the applications Activities, Services and Broadcast receivers. Start arbitrary Activities available in the target application. Watch a class method, reporting execution as it happens. screenshots The following screenshots show the main objection repl, connected to a test application on both an iPad running iOS 10.2.1, and Samsung Galaxy S5 running Android 6. A file system listing of the iOS applications main bundle A file system listing of the Android applications bundle iOS Keychain dumped for the current application, and later written to a file called keychain.json Inline SQLite query tool SSL Pinning bypass running for an iOS application SSL Pinning bypass running for an Android application sample usage A sample session, where objection version 0.1 is used to explore the applications environment. Newer versions have the REPL prompt set to the current applications name, however usage has remained the same: https://asciinema.org/a/8O6fjDHOdVKgPYeqITHXPp6HV prerequisites To run objection, all you need is the python3 interpreter to be available. Installation via pip should take care of all of the dependencies needed. For more details, please see the prerequisites section on the project wiki. As for the target mobile applications though, for iOS, an unencrypted IPA is needed and Android just the normal APK should be fine. If you have the source code of the iOS application you want to explore, then you can simply embed and load the FridaGadget.dylib from within the Xcode project. installation Installation is simply a matter of pip3 install objection. This will give you the objection command. For more detailed update and installation instructions, please refer to the wiki page here. powered by license Objection is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://sensepost.com/contact/ Download: objection-master.zip or git clone https://github.com/sensepost/objection.git Source: https://github.com/sensepost/objection

PDF nu stiu unde gasesti, eu am cumparat cartea.

Salut! Eu sunt TEM! Student, locuiesc in Cluj Napoca si sunt angajat Emerson Automation Solution. Ma ocup cu programarea de ceva timp, operatii logice si algoritmi. Cand am descoperit prima data acest forum aveam vreo 14 ani cred, nu intelegeam mare lucru, insa eram foarta pasionat. Acum totul este mai limpede! Sper sa fie frumos timpul petrecut aici si sa invat cat mai multe chestii! Cateva sfaturi despre cum as putea incepe sa invat pas cu pas sa crackuiesc ar fii de mare folos

Nu tocmai la poloboc Windows 10 Home Chrome 59.0.3071.115